McManus, Walter (2007): The link between gasoline prices and vehicle sales:economic theory trumps conventional Detroit wisdom. Published in: Business Economics , Vol. 42, No. 1 (January 2007): pp. 54-60.
Download (135Kb) | Preview
This paper examines the link between fuel prices and sales of cars and trucks. U.S. automakers have long denied that such a link exists. One source of this false belief is an obsession with the crude count of units sold, equating Hummers with Minis. Another source is the conventional “wisdom” that Americans are unwilling to pay for fuel economy. The paper presents theoretical reasons and market evidence that refute Detroit’s conventional wisdom. American manufacturers’ reaction to rising fuel prices over the last few years revealed the shortcomings of the U.S. automakers’ recent product and powertrain strategies. The effect of rising fuel prices has, in effect, been offset by reducing prices of vehicles in inverse proportion to fuel economy. Thus, unit sales of large SUVs could be maintained, but their revenue (and profit) fell because vehicle prices were cut, directly or indirectly. The paper concludes with a few practical guidelines that business economists should use to prevent their companies from experiencing the recent massive losses experienced by the U.S. automobile industry.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute|
|Original Title:||The link between gasoline prices and vehicle sales:economic theory trumps conventional Detroit wisdom|
|Keywords:||automotive industry; fuel prices; vehicle sales; American automakers|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics
L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L62 - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment
|Depositing User:||Walter McManus|
|Date Deposited:||09. Jun 2007|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 12:35|
Bresnahan, T. F. 1987. “Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Industry: The 1955 Price War.” The Journal of Industrial Economics. 35:4, pp. 457-82. Breusch, T.S. and A.R. Pagan. 1980. “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics.” The Review of Economic Studies. 47:1, pp. 239-53. Copeland, A. and G. Hall. 2005. “The Response of Prices, Sales, and Output to Temporary Changes in Demand.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper NO. 1543, Yale University, December. Corrado, C., W. Dunn, and M. Otoo. 2006. “Incentives and Prices for Motor Vehicles: What Has Been Happening in Recent Years?” 2006-09 Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board. General Motors Corporation. 2006. Press release. September 19. ———. 2006. “U.S. Sales and Market Update Conference Call - Media Briefing.” Mark LaNeve, GMNA Vice President of Vehicle Sales, Service, and Marketing and Paul Ballew, Executive Director, Global Market and Industry Analysis. March 27. Griliches, Z. 1961. “Hedonic Price Indexes for Automobiles: An Econometric Analysis of Quality Change.” In The Price Statistics of the Federal Government, National Bureau of Economic Research. Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. 2006. “The Role of Entry Deterrence in Explaining Why Prices Fall During Times of High Demand.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, SUNY.