Hasan, Dr. Syed Akif and Subhani, Dr. Muhammad Imtiaz (2011): The Effects of Supervisor-Subordinate Genders on Subordinates’ Involvement Across Managerial Functions. Published in: Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business , Vol. 3, No. 2 (2011): pp. 314-324.
Download (231Kb) | Preview
One of the renowned agendas’ of the management study around the globe encircles the gender biasness or non-biasness in performing the basic managerial functions. Pertaining to the factual studies, mixed views have been brought to light that whether male supervisors have a good relationship with male subordinates or female subordinates and whether female supervisors have good relationship with female subordinates or male subordinates. It is often assumed that cross gender supervisor subordinate relationships are better than same gender supervisor subordinate relationships. The involvement of subordinates in the four managerial functions namely planning, organizing, controlling and motivating are investigated to conclude the effects of gender on subordinate involvement in management functions by the supervisors. A sample of 1000 respondents were specifically chosen from banking sector to identify if gender of supervisor and subordinate has any effect on subordinates’ involvement across managerial functions. To achieve this, firstly, mean of male supervisor with same and cross gender subordinates is compared on the basis of their involvement in managerial functions through applying the split analysis. Results revealed that male supervisors involve male subordinates more in managerial functions than female subordinates. As for female supervisors they have the same level of involvement of both the genders across managerial functions but somehow these involvements are more towards the male subordinates.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Effects of Supervisor-Subordinate Genders on Subordinates’ Involvement Across Managerial Functions|
|English Title:||The Effects of Supervisor-Subordinate Genders on Subordinates’ Involvement Across Managerial Functions|
|Keywords:||Supervisor, Subordinate, Gender, Managerial functions|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M5 - Personnel Economics
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M5 - Personnel Economics > M54 - Labor Management
|Depositing User:||Muhammad Imtiaz Subhani|
|Date Deposited:||15. Nov 2011 16:05|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 12:19|
Baird,J.,E. & Bradley,P., H.(1979). Styles of Management and Communication: A Comparative Study of Men and Women. Communication Monographs, 46(2):101-11.
Bem,S.,L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42:155-162.
Bigoness, W., J. (1976). Effect of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61:80-84.
Donnell, P. & Hall, J. (1980). Men and women as managers. A significant case of no significant difference. Organizational dynamics, 8:60-67.
Fairhurst, G., T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60:321-351.
Fix, B. & Sias, P., M. (2006). Person-centered communication, leader-member exchange and employee job satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 23:35-44.
Foehrenback, J. & Goldfarb, S. (1990). Employee communication in the ‘90s: Greater expectations. Communication World, 7(6):101-106.
Frank, F., D. & Drucker, J. (1977). The influence of evaluatee's sex on evaluation of a response of a managerial selection instrument. Sex Roles, 3:59-64.
Goh,S., C.(1991). Sex Differences in Perceptions of Interpersonal Work Style, Career Emphasis, Supervisory Mentoring Behavior, and Job Satisfaction, Sex Roles, 24(11/12):701.
Gutek, B., A. (1988). Sex segregation and women at work: A selective review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 37:103-120.
Heilman, M.,E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. In L.L.Cummings & B.M Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior( 5th ed., pp. 269-298).
Kaufman, C.,.G. & Shikiar, R. (1985). Sex of Employee and Sex of Supervisor: Effect on Attributions for the Causality of Success and Failure. Sex Roles, 12(3/4): 257-269.
Kram, K., E. (1985). Mentoring at work. Boston: Scott, Foreman & Co.
Liden, R., C. (1985). Female perceptions of female and male managerial behavior. Sex roles, 12: 421-432.
Locke, E., A. & Latham, G., P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction. Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4):240-246.
Maier, M. (1992). Evolving paradigms of management in organizations: A gendered analysis. Journal of Management Systems, 4(1): 29-45.
O'Neill, R., M. & Blake-Beard, S., D. (2002). Gender Barriers to the Female Mentor/ Male Protégé Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1): 51-63.
Orbell, J., Dawes, R. & Schwartz-Shea., P. (1994). Trust, social categories, and individuals: The case of gender. Motivation and Emotion, 18:109-128.
Pelled, L., H., Eisenhardt, K.,M. & Xin, K., R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1):1-28.
Powell, G., N. (1990). One more time: Do female and male managers differ? Academy of Management Executive, 4: 68-75.
Ragins, B., R. (1999). Gender and Mentoring Relationships: A Review and Research Agenda for the Next Decade. In G.N. Powell (Eds), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp.347-369). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Ragins, B., R. & Cotton, J., L. (1991). Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal, 34:939-951.
Ragins, B., R. & Scandura, T., A. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 37:957-971.
Ridgeway & Lovin., S. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25:191-216.
Rosen, B., R. & Jerdee, T., H. (1974). Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59:9-14.
Scandura, T. ,A. & Ragins, B., R. (1993).The Effects of Sex and Gender Role Orientation on Mentorship in Male-dominated Occupations, Journal of Vocational Behavior,43:251-265.
Scott, J., W. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis', The American Historical Review, 91(5): 1053-1074.
Shockley-Zalabak, P. (1988). Fundamentals of organizational communication. New York: Longman Inc.
Sias, P.,M. (2008). Organizing Relationships: Traditional and Emerging Perspectives on Workplace Relationships.
Spence, J., T., R., Helmreich., & Stapp. J. (1975). Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attribute and their Relation to Self-esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Femininity, Journal of Personality andvSocial Psychology, 37(1), 29-39.
Terborg, J., R. (1977). Women in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62:647-664.
Trempe, J., Rigny, A.,J. & Haccoun, R., R. (1985). Subordinate satisfaction with male and female managers: Role of perceived supervisory influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1):44-47.
Tsui, A., S. & O'Reilly, C., A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 402-423.
Varma, A. & Stroh, L., K. (2001). The Impact of Same-Sex LMX Dyads on Performance Evaluations. Institute of Human Resources and Industrial Relations, Loyola University, Chicago.
Vecchio, R., P. & Bullis, R.,C. (2001). Moderators of the influence of supervisor-subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5): 884-96.
Williams, M., L. & Lock, N., V. (1999). Supervisor Mentoring: Does a Female Manager Make a Difference ? Paper presented at the Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management conference, Annapolis, MD, 04 November, 1999.
Witherspoon, P., D. (1997). Communicating leadership: An organizational Perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.