Konya, Laszlo and Matyas, Laszlo and Harris, Mark (2011): GATT/WTO membership does promote international trade after all – Some new empirical evidence.
Download (514Kb) | Preview
The declared objective of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) is to promote free trade between member states. Nonetheless, an exhaustive study of bilateral merchandise trade based on a large panel data set led Rose (2004) to conclude that there is no compelling empirical evidence to show that GATT/WTO membership does actually encourage international trade. This unanticipated finding generated a great deal of attention in the literature and several scholars put forward various explanations for it. In this paper we set up a new international trade data set which, unlike Rose’s, allows us to model exports and imports separately and to study the extensive margin of trade, i.e., the number of bilateral trade relationships. Using this data set and a gravity framework, first we demonstrate how to obtain puzzling negative results and so explain the previous unintuitive findings. Then we show that GATT/WTO membership does indeed encourage international trade, so the most obvious reason for Rose’s negative outcome is the lack of zero bilateral trade observations in his data set.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||GATT/WTO membership does promote international trade after all – Some new empirical evidence|
|Keywords:||GATT/WTO; international trade; gravity model; multidimensional panel data|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C23 - Models with Panel Data; Longitudinal Data; Spatial Time Series
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C24 - Truncated and Censored Models; Switching Regression Models
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F49 - Other
|Depositing User:||Laszlo Matyas|
|Date Deposited:||24. Nov 2011 14:46|
|Last Modified:||10. Oct 2013 09:16|
Anderson, J.E., Wincoop, van E. 2003. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93, 170-192.
Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H.. 2007. Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade? Journal of International Economics 71, 72-95.
Egger, P. 2000. A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation. Economics Letters 66, 25-31.
Felbermayr, G.J., Kohler, W. 2006. Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade. Review of World Economics 142, 642-674.
Gleditsch, K.S. 2002. Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46, 712-724.
Green, W.H. 2004. Fixed Effects and Bias Due to the Incidental Parameters Problem in the Tobit Model. Econometric Reviews 23, 125-147.
Harris, M.N., Kónya, L., Mátyás, L.. 2002. Modelling the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Bilateral Trade Flows: OECD, 1990-1996. The World Economy 25, 387-405.
Heckman, J.J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47, 153–161.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M.J, Rubinstein, Y. 2008. Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, 441-487.
Hummels, D., Levinsohn, J. 1995. Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 799–836.
Lee, J.-W., Swagel, P. 1997. Trade Barriers and Trade Flows across Countries and Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 372-382.
Liu, X. 2007. GATT/WTO Promotes Trade Strongly: Sample Selection and Model Specification. Mimeo, Coles School of Business, Kennesaw State University.
Magee, C. S. P. 2003. Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements: An Empirical Analysis. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 2, article 15, http://www. bepress.com/bejeap/ contributions/vol2/iss1/art15.
Martin, W., Pham, C.S. 2008. Estimating the Gravity Model When Zero Trade Flows are Frequent. Mimeo, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Deakin University.
Mátyás, L. 1997. Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model. The World Economy 20, 363-368.
Mátyás, L. 1998. The Gravity Model: Some Econometric Considerations. The World Economy 21, 397-401.
McCallum, J. 1995. National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. American Economic Review 85, 615-623.
Piermartini, R., The, R. 2005. Demystifying Modelling Methods for Trade Policy. WTO Discussion Papers, No. 10.
Pöyhönen, P. 1963. A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90, 93-99.
Rose, A.K. 2004. Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade? American Economic Review 94, 98-114.
Silva, S.J.M.C., Tenreyro, S. 2006. The Log of Gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 641-658.
Subramanian, A., Wei, S.-J. 2007. The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but Unevenly. Journal of International Economics 72, 151-175.
Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy – Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
Tomz, M., Goldstein, J.L., Rivers, D. 2007. Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade? Comment. American Economic Review 97, 2005-2018.
Trefler, D. 1993. Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy. Journal of Political Economy 101, 138-160.