Mueller, Christopher and Boehme, Enrico (2011): The monopoly benchmark on two-sided markets.
Download (2MB) | Preview
The literature on the effects of market concentration in platform industries or two-sided markets often compares the competitive outcome against a benchmark. This benchmark is either the “joint management” solution in which one decision maker runs all platforms or a “pure” monopoly with just one platform. Literature has not generally discussed, which benchmark is the appropriate one. We show that the appropriate benchmark, i.e. how many platforms the monopolist will operate, depends on whether agents multi- or singlehome, whether the externalities are positive or negative, and in some cases on the properties of the demand functions. Different situations require different benchmarks. Our results also help to anticipate the effects of proposed platform mergers, where the assessment might crucially depend on the number of platforms after a merger.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The monopoly benchmark on two-sided markets|
|Keywords:||two-sided markets; market concentration; monopoly|
|Subjects:||K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K20 - General
L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure and Pricing > D42 - Monopoly
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure and Pricing > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L12 - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
|Depositing User:||Christopher Mueller|
|Date Deposited:||25. Nov 2011 12:59|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 16:34|
Ambrus, A., & Argenziano, R. (2009). Asymmetric Networks in Two-Sided Markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1(1), 17-52.
Ambrus, A., & Reisinger, M. (2006). Exclusive vs overlapping viewers in media markets. Unpublished Working Paper. Department of Economics, Ludwig-Maximilians- University.
Anderson, S. P., & Coate, S. (2005). Market provision of broadcasting: a welfare analysis. Review of Economic Studies, 72(4), 947-972.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309-328.
Chandra, A., & Collard-Wexler, A. (2009). Mergers in two-sided markets: an application to the Canadian newspaper industry. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(4), 1045-1070.
Chaudhri, V. (1998). Pricing and efficiency of a circulation industry: The case of newspapers. Information Economics and Policy, 10(1), 59-76.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39, 41-57.
McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2007). Academic journal prices in a digital age: a two-sided market model. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1).
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.
Weyl, E. G. (2010). A price theory of multi-sided platforms. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1642-1672.