Thomas S. Schelling: game theory and indirect communication

Estrada, Fernando (2010): Thomas S. Schelling: game theory and indirect communication. Unpublished.

Abstract

In their recent work Thomas S. Schelling (2007, 2010), reiterating original arguments about game theory and its applications to social sciences. In particular, game theory helps to explore situations in which agents make decisions interdependent (strategic communication). Schelling's originality is to extend economic theory to social sciences. When a player can anticipate the options and influence the decisions of others. The strategy, indirect communication plays a crucial role. To illustrate, we investigate how to perform the payoff matrix in cases of bribery and threat

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social Science, Schelling, game theory, strategic communications, bribes, threats
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games

References

Betty Tullera, McNeel G. Jantzena, Viktor K. Jirsa, 2008, “A dynamical approach to speech categorization Two routes to learning” New Ideas in Psychology 26, 208–226.

Brown P, Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: Some Universalism Language Usage, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Clark HH., 1996, Using Language (Cambridge University Press, New York); Holtgraves TM (2002) Language as Social Action (Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ). Pinker S (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature (Viking, New York).

Dawkins R, Krebs JR., 1978, Animal signals: Information or manipulation? Behavioral Ecology, eds Krebs JR,Davies NB (Blackwell, Oxford), pp 282–309.

Estrada, Gallego, Fernando, 2004, Las metáforas de una guerra perpetua. Pragmática de la argumentación en el conflicto armado en Colombia, Fondo Editorial Universidad Eafit, pgs. 178.

Estrada, Gallego, Fernando, 2007a, "La información y el rumor en zonas de conflicto, estrategias por el poder local en la confrontación armada en Colombia", Revista Análisis Político, IEPRI, v.60 p.44 – 59.

Estrada, Gallego Fernando, 2007b, "La argumentación: Alternativa para el manejo de conflictos", Revista Zero, Universidad Externado de Colombia, v.18, pp.48 – 54.

Feiler B., 2000, Pocketful of dough. Gourmet October:99–101.

Goffman E., 1981, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, New York).Versión española: La presencia de la persona en la vida cotidiana, Buenos Aires, Amorrortou.

Grice HP., 1975, Logic and conversation. Syntax & Semantics, eds Cole P, Morgan JL (Academic, New York), Vol 3.

Pinker S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature (Viking, New York).

Richard Breheny, 2006, Communication and Folk Psychology, Mind & Language, Vol. 21 No. 1 February, pp. 74–107.

Schelling TC., 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (Versión al español de Adolfo Martín, La Estrategia del Conflicto, Madrid, Editorial Tecnos, 1964).

Schelling, T. C. 1984. Choice and Consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schelling, T.C., 2007, Jean-Paul Carvalho, “An interview with Thomas Schelling” Oxonomics 2.

Schelling, T.C., 2010, “Game theory: a practitioner´s approach”, Economics and Philosophy, 26, 27–46

Stephen Levinson, 2000, “After Grice: Neo- and post-perspectives”, Review article of Stephen Levinson, Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. xxiii + 480 pp., en Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2006) 2223–2234, Paperback, ISBN: 0-262-62130-4.

Williams GC., 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton University Press, Princeton); Trivers R (1985) Social Evolution (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA).