Sahu, Pritish Kumar (2010): FDI, wage inequality and employment in emerging economies: recent evidence from Indian manufacturing.
Download (264Kb) | Preview
The increased integration of developing countries with the global economy has seen a remarkable increase in foreign capital over the years. While the increasing momentum of FDI capital in the manufacturing of the emerging economies has left several questions unanswered, we focus our discussion on the trends in employment and wage inequality in context of developing economies. The empirical evidence in this regard is drawn from the Indian manufacturing by using the recent firm level panel data. It draws attention to the determinants of wage rate and employment in Indian manufacturing vis-à-vis the foreign and the domestic affiliates during the period 2001-02 to 2007-08. While empirical evidence in regard to developing countries provides a mixture of results, our analysis broadly concludes that for the entire manufacturing and the domestic affiliates, capital intensity was the most dominant factor in determining the wage rate. On the other hand the high output per worker and foreign ownership played the most prominent role in determining the wage rate of the foreign affiliates during our study period. Similarly, it is observed that the employment performance of the firm is less in high capital intensive firms, whereas the size and the rate of profit of the entire manufacturing and its subgroups are observed positive and significant in determining the employment.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||FDI, wage inequality and employment in emerging economies: recent evidence from Indian manufacturing|
|English Title:||FDI, Wage Inequality and Employment in Emerging Economies: Recent Evidence from Indian Manufacturing|
|Keywords:||; Employment; Wage; Panel data; Domestic Affiliates; Foreign Affiliates|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Macroeconomics: Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment > E24 - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
|Depositing User:||Pritish Sahu|
|Date Deposited:||03. Dec 2011 18:01|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 21:26|
1. Aitken, B. and Harrison, A. (1999). "Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela", American Economic Review, Vol-89, No-3, pp. 605-618.
2. Akerlof, G.A. (1982). "Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, Nov., pp. 543-569.
3. Almeida, R. (2003). "The Effects of Foreign Owned Firms on the Labor Market", IZA Discussion Paper No. 785.
4. Banga R. (2005). "Impact of Liberalisation on Wages and Employment in Indian Manufacturing Industries", Working paper Series, no. 153, ICRIER, February.
5. Banga R. (2005). "Liberalisation and Wage Inequality in India", Working paper Series, no. 156, ICRIER, March.
6. Blomstrom, M. and Perssion, H. (1983). "Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry", World Development, 11, pp. 493–501.
7. Caves, R. E. (1974). "Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in Host Country Markets", Economica, 41, pp.176–93.
8. Christoph E. (2005). "The FDI - employment link in a globalizing world: The case of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico," Employment strategy papers 2005-17, International Labour Office.
9. Conyon, M. et al. (1999). "The Impact of Foreign Acquisition on Wages and Productivity in the U.K", University of Nottingham GLM (Research paper 99/8).
10. Das, S. P. (2001). "Trade and relative wages: The role of supervisory function by skilled workers", European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pp. 45-65, January.
11. Deininger, K. and L. Squire (1998). "New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth", Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pp. 259-287.
12. Driffield, N. (1996). "Global Competition and the Labour Market", Harwood, Reading.
13. Glass, A.J. and K. Saggi (2002). "Multinational Firms and Technology Transfer", Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, pp. 495-513.
14. Glickman, N. J. and Douglas P. W. (1989). "The New Competitors: How Foreign Investors Are Changing the US Economy", New York, Basic Books.
15. Globerman, St. et al. (1994). "The Economic Performance of Foreign Affiliates in Canada", Canadian Journal of Economics, XXVII, pp. 143-156.
16. Gordon, H. H., (2001). "Should Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment?", G-24 Discussion Papers 9, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
17. Grima, S. et al.(1999). "Wages, Productivity and Foreign Ownership in U.K Manufacturing", CRGLM Research Paper 99/14.
18. Haddad, M. and A. Harrison (1993). "Are there Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment: Evidence from Panel-Data for Morocco", Journal of Development Economics, 42, pp.51-74.
19. Haskel, J.E. et al. (2002). "Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms?", NBER working paper 8724.
20. Hymer, S. H. (1979). "The multinational corporation and the international division of labor" in Cohen R.B. et al.(eds), "The Multinational Corporations: A radical Approach", Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, ch. 6, pp. 140-64.
21. Javorcik, B.S. (2004). "Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages", American Economic Review, 93, pp. 605-627.
22. Jenkins, R. (2005). "Globalisation FDI and Employment in Viet Nam", London.
23. Kulfas, M. et al. (2002). "Inversión Extranjera y Empresas Transnacionales en la Economía Argentina" Serie Estudios y Perspectivas, No. 10 (ECLAC, Buenos Aires).
24. Lipsey and F. Sjöholm (2001). "Foreign Direct Investment and Wages in Indonesian Manufacturing", NBER Working Paper No. 8299, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. Lipsey, R.E. (2002). "Home and Host Country Effects of FDI", NBER Working Paper No. 9293.
26. Machine and V. Raneen (1998). "Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven OECD Countries", Quarterly Journal of Economics. November, 113 (4)L. pp. 1215-44.
27. Nickell, S. and B. Bell (1996). "Changes in the Distribution of Wages and Unemployment in OECD Countries", American Economic Review Vol- 86, No. 2, May.
28. Pianta and Vivarelli (2000). "The Employment Impact of Innovation: Evidence and Policy", Routledge, London.
29. Pradhan, J.P. (2002). "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in India: A Production Function Analysis". Indian Journal of Economics 82 (327): pp. 582-586.
30. Ramirez, M. D. (2002). "Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico and Chile: A Critical Appraisal", in Baer, Werner; Miles, William R. (eds.): Foreign direct investment in Latin America: Its changing nature at the turn of the century (New York, The Harworth Press).
31. Robert, L. and M. Oliver, (2001). "Foreign Direct Investment: Flows, Volatility and Growth in Developing Countries", Research Report 01E16, University of Groningen.
32. Solow, Robert (1979). "Another Possible Source of Wage Stickiness", Journal of Macroeconomics, pp.79-82.
33. Stephen M. and J. V. Reenen, (1998). "Technology and changes in skill structure: evidence from seven OECD countries," IFS Working Papers W98/04, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
34. Weiss, A. (1991). "Efficiency Wages: Models of Unemployment", Layoffs and Wage Dispersion. Oxford: Clarendon.
35.Zhang, F. and Jingping Z. (1998). "The Impact of Multinational Enterprises on Economic Structure and Efficiency in China", Working Paper, China Center for Economic Research, August.