Jo, Tae-Hee (2011): Heterodox Critiques of Corporate Social Responsibility.
Download (474kB) | Preview
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is in vogue in recent times. It has been widely received by socially concerned people in business, academia, and NGOs that CSR would lend support to the improvement in social welfare and the protection of environment. However, the question that whether corporations are socially responsible or corporations should behave responsibly is beside the point from the heterodox economic perspective. The proper question to pose is how corporations manipulate the social by means of CSR. Drawing upon the heterodox theory of the business enterprise along with the social provisioning perspective, I argue that the business corporation has always acted in a socially responsible manner by generating ethical-political-cultural values, norms, and beliefs that legitimize whatever the business corporation does is socially responsible. In this respect, CSR is a market-based means to control the social provisioning process by way of creating an illusionary image of corporations and, thereby, hiding the ruthless acquisitive drive and the exploitation of human beings and nature.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Heterodox Critiques of Corporate Social Responsibility|
|Keywords:||Corporate social responsibility, social provisioning process, the business enterprise, social welfare|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General
G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G30 - General
|Depositing User:||Dr. Tae-Hee Jo|
|Date Deposited:||12. Dec 2011 19:39|
|Last Modified:||23. Apr 2015 21:53|
Baran, Paul and Paul M. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1969. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In A Benthamite Reader, ed. Mary Mack. New York: Pegasus pp. 78–167. Originally published in 1780.
Berle, Adolf A. 1932. “For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note.” Harvard Law Review 45(7):1365–1372.
Berle, Adolf A. and Gardiner C. Means. 1968. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Revised ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. Originally published in 1932.
Carroll, Archie B. 2009. A History of Corporate Social Responsibility. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. Andrew Crane, Abagail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon and Donald S. Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 19–46.
Champlin, Dell P. and Janet T. Knoedler. 2004. “J. M. Clark and the Economics of Responsibility.” Journal of Economic Issues 38(2):545–52.
Clark, John M. 1916. “The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility.” The Journal of Political Economy 24(3):209–229.
Crotty, James R. 1990. “Owner-Manager Conflict and Financial Theories of Investment Instability: A Critical Assessment of Keynes, Tobin, and Minsky.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12(4):519–542.
Davis, Ian. 2005. “What is the business of business?” McKinsey Quarterly 3:105–113.
Doane, Beborah. 2005. “The Myth of CSR.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 3:23–29.
Dodd, E. Merrick. 1932. “For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?” Harvard Law Review 45(7):1145–1163.
Eichner, Alfred S. 1969. The Emergence of Oligopoly: Sugar Refining as a Case Study. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Eichner, Alfred S. 1976. The Megacorp and Oligopoly: Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fligstein, Neil. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fligstein, Neil. 2001. The Architecture of Markets. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.” New York Times Magazine (September 13).
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gruchy, Allan G. 1987. The Reconstruction of Economics: an analysis of the fundamentals of Institutional economics. New York: Greenwood Press.
Hahnel, Robin. 2005. Economic Justice and Democracy: From Competition to Cooperation. New York: Routledge.
Hanlon, Gerard. 2009. Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of the Firm–On the Denial of Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. Andrew Crane, Abagail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon and Donald S. Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 156–172.
Henry, John F. 1990. The Making of Neoclassical Economics. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
Henry, John F. 2007. ““Bad” Decisions, Poverty, and Economic Theory: The Individualist and Social Perspectives in Light of “The American Myth”.” Forum for Social Economics 36:17–27.
Henry, John F. 2009. “The Illusion of the Epoch: Neoclassical Economics as a Case Study.” Studi e Note di Economia 1.
Henry, John F. 2011. Is Fraud a Necessary Element in a Well-Functioning Capitalist Society? Paper presnted at the Association for Institutional Thought Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, USA.
Ho, Karen. 2009. Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Ireland, Paddy. 2010. “Limited liability, shareholder rights and the problem of corporate irresponsibility.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34:837–856.
Jenkins, Rhys. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility. In Handbook of Economics and Ethics, ed. Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar pp. 69–76.
Jo, Tae-Hee. 2011a. A Heterodox Microfoundation of Business Cycles. In Heterodox Analyses of Financial Crisis and Reform, ed. Joëlle J. Leclaire, Tae-Hee Jo and Jane E. Knodell. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar pp. 111–123.
Jo, Tae-Hee. 2011b. “Social Provisioning and Socio-Economic Modeling.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70(5):1094–1116.
Jo, Tae-Hee. forthcoming. “Saving Private Business Enterprises: A Heterodox Microeconomic Approach to Market Governance and Market Regulation.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology .
Karnani, Aneel. 2010. “The case against corporate social responsibility.” The Wall Street Journal (August 23).
Keynes, John M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, UK: Macmillan.
Lawson, Tony. 2003. Reorienting Economics. London, UK: Routledge.
Lazonick, William and Mary O’Sullivan. 2000. “Maximizing Shareholder Value: A new ideology for corporate governance.” Economy and Society 29(1):13–35.
Lee, Frederic S. 1990. ““The Modern Corporation” and Gardiner Means’s Critiques of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 24(3):673–693.
Lee, Frederic S. 1996. “Review of Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century by Margaret M. Blair (1995) and Managers Vs. Owners: The Struggle for Corporate Control in American Democracy by A. Kaufman, L. Zacharias, and M. Karson (1995).” Journal of Economic Issues 30(4):1193–5.
Lee, Frederic S. 1998. Post Keynesian Price Theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Frederic S. 2002. “Theory Creation and the Methodological Foundation of Post Keynesian Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26:789–804.
Lee, Frederic S. 2008. Heterodox Economics. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. Second online ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, Frederic S. 2009. The economics of the Industrial Workers of the World: Job control and revolution. In Radical Economics and Labor: Essays inspired by the IWW Centennial, ed. Frederic S. Lee and Jon Bekken. London and New York: Routledge pp. 55–77.
Lee, Frederic S. 2010. Alfred Eichner’s missing “Complete Model”: A Heterodox Micro-Macro Model of a Monetary Production Economy. In Money and macrodynamics: Alfred Eichner and post-Keynesian economics, ed. Marc Lavoie, Louis-Philippe Rochon and Mario Seccareccia. Armonk, NY and London, England: M.E. Sharpe pp. 22–42.
Lee, Frederic S. and Tae-Hee Jo. 2011. “Social Surplus Approach and Heterodox Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 45(4):857–875.
Lutz, Mark A. 1999. Economics for the Common Good: Two Centuries of Social Economic Thought in the Humanistic Tradition. London, UK: Routledge.
Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. II. New York: Penguin Books.
Melé, Domènec. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. Andrew Crane, Abagail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon and Donald S. Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 47–82.
Minsky, Hyman P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
O’Hara, Phillip A. and Howard J. Sherman. 2004. “Veblen and Sweezy on Monopoly Capital, Crises, Conflict, and the State.” Journal of Economic Issues 38(4):969–987.
Polanyi, Karl. 1968. The Economy as Instituted Process. In Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies: Essays of Karl Polanyi, ed. George Dalton. Garden City. NY: A Doubleday Anchor Original pp. 139–174.
Power, Marilyn. 2004. “Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 10(3):3–19.
Prechel, Harland. 2000. Big Business and the State: Historical Transactions and Corporate Transformation, 1880s-1990s. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Reinhardt, Forest L., Robert N. Stavins and Richard H.K. Vietor. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(2):219–239.
Rostow, Eugene V. 1959. To whom and for what ends is corporate management responsible? In The Corporation in Modern Society, ed. Edward S. Mason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press pp. 44–71.
Soederberg, Susanne. 2007. “Socially responsible investment and the development agenda: Peering behind the progressive veil of non-financial benchmarking.” Third World Quarterly 28(7):1219–1237.
Soederberg, Susanne. 2010. Corporate Power and Ownership in Contemporary Capitalism: The Politics of Resistance and Domination. London and New York: Routledge.
Starr, Martha A. 2008. “Socially Responsible Investment and Pro-Social Change.” Journal of Economic Issues 42(1):51–73.
Starr, Martha A. 2010. The social economics of corporate social responsibility: Information abundance and collective action. In Global Social Economy: Development, Work and Policy, ed. John B. Davis. London and New York: Routledge pp. 234–255.
The Economist. 2005. “A special report on corporate social responsibility.” The Economist (January 20).
Veblen, Thorstein B. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Veblen, Thorstein B. 1919. The Vested Interests and the Common Man. New York: B.W. Huebsch.
Veblen, Thorstein B. 1921. The Engineers and the Price System. New York: The Viking Press.
Veblen, Thorstein B. 1964. Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of America. New York: Sentry Press. Originally published in 1923.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. “Nobody has to be vile.” London Review of Books 28(7).
Wray, L. Randall. 2009. “The rise and fall of money manager capitalism: a Minskyan approach.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33:807–828.