Di Bartolomeo, Giovanni and Manzo, Marco (2007): Do tax distortions lead to more indeterminacy? A New Keynesian perspective.
Download (242Kb) | Preview
Following the recent developments of the literature on stabilization policies, this paper investigates the effect of tax distortions on equilibrium determinacy in a New Keynesian economy with rule-of-thumb consumers and capital accumulation. In particular, we focus on the inter-action between monetary policy and tax distortions in supporting the saddle-path equilibrium under the assumptions of balanced budget and monetary policy satisfying a Taylor rule.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||University of Teramo|
|Original Title:||Do tax distortions lead to more indeterminacy? A New Keynesian perspective|
|Keywords:||Rule-of-thumb consumers; equilibrium determinacy; fiscal and monetary policy inter-actions; and tax distortions|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
|Depositing User:||Giovanni Di Bartolomeo|
|Date Deposited:||14. Jun 2007|
|Last Modified:||07. Jan 2014 21:30|
Ahmad, Y. (2004), Money Market Rates and Implied CCAPM Rates: Some International Evidence, Georgetown University, mimeo, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (forthcoming). Amato, J. and T. Laubach (2003), Rule-of-Thumb Behavior and Monetary Policy, European Economic Review, 47: 791-831. Bilbiie, F.O. (2004), The Great Inflation, Limited Asset Markets Participation and Aggregate Demand: FED Policy was Better than you Think, European Central Bank Working Paper No. 408. Blanchard, O. and C.M. Kahn (1980), The Solution of Linear Difference Models under Rational Expectations, Econometrica, 48: 1305-1311. Busato, F., B. Chiarini and G.M. Rey (2005), Equilibrium Implications of Fiscal Policy with Tax Evasion, Working Paper No 4, University of Aarhus. Campbell, J.Y. and N.G. Mankiw (1989), Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, MIT Press, Cambridge:185-216. Clarida R., J. Galì, and M. Gertler (1998), Monetary Policy Rules in Practice Some International Evidence, European Economic Review, 42: 1033-1067. Clarida R., J. Galì, and M. Gertler (1999), The Science of Monetary Policy, Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 1661-1707. Colciago A. (2006), Rule of Thumb Consumers, Nominal Rigidities and the Effect of Government Spending Shocks. University of Milan Bicocca, mimeo. Di Bartolomeo, G. and L. Rossi (2006), Efficacy of Monetary Policy and Limited Asset Market Participation: Neoclassical vs. Keynesian Effects, International Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming. Erceg, C.J., W.H. Dale, and A. Levin (2000), Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46: 281-313. Fuhrer, J.C. (2000), Habit Formation in Consumption and Its Implications for Monetary-Policy Models, American Economic Review, 90: 367-90. Fuhrer, J.C. and G.D. Rudebusch (2003), Estimating the Euler Equation for Output, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, mimeo. Galì J., D. Lòpez-Salido, J. Vallés (2003), Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and the Design of Interest Rate Rules, Banco de Espana, Working Paper No 320, Journal of Money Credit and Banking (forthcoming). Galì J., D. Lòpez-Salido, J. Vallés (2004), Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption, European Central Bank Working Paper No 333. Jappelli, T. (1990) Who is Credit Constrained in the US Economy?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 219-234. Mankiw, G.N. (2000), The Saver-Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy, American Economic Review, 90: 120-125. Parker, J. (1999), The Response of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes, American Economic Review, 89: 959-973. Shea, J. (1995), Union Contracts and the Life-Cycle/Permanent-Income Hypothesis, American Economic Review, 85: 186-200. Schmitt-Grohe, S. and M. Uribe (2004), Optimal Operational Monetary Policy in the Christiano-Eichenbaum-Evans Model of the U.S. Business Cycle. NBER Working Paper No. 10724. Souleles, N.S. (1999), The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds, American Economic Review, 89: 947-958. Walsh C. (2003), Monetary Theory and Policy, 2nd Edition , MIT Press, Cambridge. Woodford, M. (2004), The Taylor Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy, American Economic Review, 91: 232-237.