Hasanat Shah, Syed and Ahmad Nawaz, Hakro (2006): Economic rationale, trade impact and extent of antidumping – case study of Pakistan. Published in: The Lahore Journal of Economics , Vol. 12, No. 1 (2007): pp. 79-98.
Download (97kB) | Preview
This paper has analyzed the economic and political justification, trade impact and extent of antidumping measures initiated by Pakistan. Screening models for anti-predatory behaviour, Herfindahl-Hireshmann Index (HHI) for concentration and descriptive statistical measures used to testify the Anti dumping (AD) behaviour, determinants and spread impact. The results are consistent with the earlier literature that AD duties create trade reduction and diversion. It is evident from the results in half of the cases studied that an economic rationale has been followed in the application of AD (Anti-dumping) duties in Pakistan. Although the number of AD cases is limited, Pakistan has emerged as one of the intensive users of AD, relative to its total import share. It is also evident from the fact that intensive use of AD reduces trade and increases trade barriers, similarly, trade diversion reduces the chances of trade reduction. The key message emerging from this research is that trade diversion persists and in some cases trade diversion is substantial and it offsets the effect of AD measures on named countries to the benefit of non-named countries.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economic rationale, trade impact and extent of antidumping – case study of Pakistan|
|Keywords:||Antidumping, Trade diversion, Economic rationale|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade
|Depositing User:||Hasanat Shah Syed|
|Date Deposited:||10. Jan 2012 16:01|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 17:07|
Aggarwal, Aradhna, 2002, “Antidumping Law and Practice: An Indian Perspective”, CRIER Working Paper No. 85, New Delhi.
Barcelo, J., 1971, “Antidumping Laws As Barriers to Trade-the US and International Dumping Code”, 57 Comell L R, pp: 491-560.
Blonigen, Bruce A. and Prusa, Thomas J., 2003, “Antidumping and Retaliation Threats”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 60, pp: 249-273
Boltuck, R. D., 1991, “Assessing the Effects on the Domestic Industry of Price Dumping”, in P. K. M. Tharakan (ed), Policy implication of Antidumping Measures (North Holland).
Brenton, P., 2001, “Anti-Dumping Policies in the EU and Trade Diversion”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 17, pp: 593-607.
Deardorff, A. V., 1993, “Economic Perspective in Antidumping Law”, Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press.
Finger, J. M., 1993, “Antidumping: How it Works and Who Gets Hurt” (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
Finger, J. M, H. K. Hall, and D. R. Nelson. 1982, “The Political Economy of Administered Protection”, American Economic Review, Vol. 72(3), pp: 452-466.
Finger, J. M., Francis Ng and Sonam, Wangchuk, 2000, “Antidumping and Safeguard Policy”, Presented at the University of Michigan , Gerald R.Ford School of Public Policy and Japan Economy Program Conference, Oct, 5-6, 2000.
Hansen, W. L. and T. J. Prusa, 1996, “Cumulation and ITC Decision Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater Than The Whole”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 34(4), pp: 746-769.
Hansen, W. L. and T. J. Prusa, 1997, “The Economics and Politics of Trade Policy: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Antidumping Decisions”, Review of International Economics, Vol. 5(2), pp: 230-245.
Hansen, W. L. and Thomas J. Prusa, 1995, “The Road Most Taken: The Rise of Title VII Protection”, The World Economy, Vol. 18(2), pp: 295-313.
Hutton, S and Trebilcock M., 1990, “An Empirical Study of the Application of Canadian Anti- dumping Laws: A Search for Normative Rationales”, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 123(4).
Katrak Homi, 1977, “Multinational Monopolies and Commercial Policies”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.29, pp:283-91.
Leclerc, J., 1999, “Reforming Antidumping Law: Balancing and Interests of Consumers and Domestic Industries”, Mc Gill Law Journal, Vol. 44, pp: 113-119.
Lee, H. K. and J. S. Mah, 2003, “Institutional Changes and Antidumping Decisions In The United States”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 25, pp: 555-565.
Messerlin P. A. and P. K. M. Tharakan, 1999, “The Question of Contingent Protection”, World Economy, Vol. 22(9), pp: 1251-1270.
Messerlin, P. A., 1989, “The EC Antidumping Regulations: A First Economic Appraisal 1980-1985”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, Vol. 138(3), pp: 563-587.
Miranda, J; Raul, A. Torres and Mario. Ruiz, 1998, “The International Use of Antidumping: 1987-1997”, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 32, pp: 5-72
Prusa, T. J. and S. Skeath, 2002, “The Economic and Strategic Motives for Antidumping Filing”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, Vol. 138(3), pp: 389-413
Prusa, Thomas J., 1997, “The Trade Effects of US Antidumping Actions”, in Robert C. Feenstra (Ed), The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp: 191-213
Shin, J. H., 1998, “Possible instances of Predatory Pricing in recent US Antidumping Cases”, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).
Staiger, Robert W. and Frank A. Wolak, 1994, “Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States”, Brooking Papers on Economics Activity: Microeconomics, pp:51-118.
Stiglitz, J. E., 1997, “ Dumping on Free Trade: The U.S. Import trade Laws”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 64(2), pp: 402-424.
Sevedberg Peter, 1979, “Optimal Tariff Policy on Imports from Multinationals”, Economic Record, Vol. 55, pp: 64-67.
Tharakan P.K. Mathew, 1994, “Anti-dumping policy and practice of the European Union: An overview”, Economisch en sociaal tijdschrift, Vol. 48(4), pp: 557-575
Tharakan, P. K. M., 1995, “Political Economy and Contingent Protection”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 105, pp: 1550-1564.
Tharakan, P .K. M and J. Waelbroeck, 1994, “Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Decisions in the E.C. and in the US: An Experiment in Comparative Political Economy”, European Economic Review, Vol. 38(1), pp: 171-193.
Tharakan, P. K. M, David Greenaway, and J. Tharakan, 1998, “Cumulation and Injury Determination of the European Community in Antidumping Cases”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 134(2), pp: 320-39.
Trebilcock M.J. and J. Quinn, 1979 “The Canadian Antidumping Act: A Reaction to Professor Slayton”, Canadian-US Law Journal, Vol. 2.
Viner, Jacob, 1923, “Dumping: A Problem in International Trade”, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Willig, D. R., 1998, “Economic Effects of Antidumping Policy”, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).