Aruga, Kentaka (2011): An intervention analysis on the Tokyo grain exchange non- genetically modified and conventional soybean futures market.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (310Kb) | Preview
This paper examines how efficiently the price premium for non-genetically modified (non-GM) soybeans at the Tokyo Grain Exchange (TGE) reacts to an announcement to change the contract unit, suppliers, and expiration date on the conventional soybean futures contract. Intervention analysis is used for this purpose. The results reveal that the price premium for non-GM soybeans increases after the change and this effect remains for four months. Hence, prices of the two soybean futures markets did not respond quickly to the announcement and there was an informational inefficiency after the announcement occurred.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||An intervention analysis on the Tokyo grain exchange non- genetically modified and conventional soybean futures market|
|Keywords:||price premium; non-genetically modified soybeans; conventional soybeans; intervention analysis; Tokyo Grain Exchange|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
|Depositing User:||Kentaka Aruga|
|Date Deposited:||25. Jan 2012 02:37|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 02:12|
Bjursell, J., A. Frino, Y. Tse, and G. H. K. Wang. “Volatility Activity Following Changes in the Size of Futures Contracts.” Journal of Empirical Finance 17(2010):967-80.
Booth, G., and C. Ciner. “International Transmission of Information in Corn Futures Markets.” Journal of Multinational Financial Management 7(1997):175-87.
Box, G. E. P., and G. Jenkins. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970.
Box, G. E. P., and G. C. Tiao. “Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problem.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 70(1975):70-79.
Bullock, D. S., and M. Desquilbet. “The Economics of Non-GMO Segregation and Identity Preservation.” Food Policy 27(2002):81-89.
Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(1979):427-31.
Doukas, J., and A. Rahman. “Foreign Currency Futures and Monetary Policy Announcements: An Intervention Analysis.” The Journal of Futures Markets 6(1986):343-73.
Enders, W. Applied Econometric Time Series (Second Edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
Fama, E. R. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.” The Journal of Finance 46(1991):1575-1617.
Guzhva, V. S. “Applying Intervention Analysis to Financial Performance Data: The Case of US Airlines and September 11th.”The Journal of Financial Economics 32(2008):243-59.
Hannan, E. J., and J. Rissanan. “Recursive Estimation of Mixed Autoregressive Moving Average Order.” Biometrika 69(1982):81-94.
Huffman, W. E. “Consumers’ Acceptance of (and Resistance to) Genetically Modified Foods in High-income Countries: Effects of Labels and Information in an Uncertain Environment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003):1112-18.
Karagozoglu, K. A., T. F. Martell, and G. H. K. Wang. “The Split of the S&P 500 Futures Contract: Effects on Liquidity and Market Dynamics.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 21 (2003):323-48.
Larcker, D. F., L. A. Gordon, and G. E. Pinches. “Testing for Market Efficiency: A Comparison of the Cumulative Average Residual Methodology and Intervention Analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15(1980):267-87.
McCleary, R., and R. A. Hay. Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. London: Sage Publications, 1980.
McCluskey, J. J., K. M. Grimsrud, H. Ouchi, and T. I. Wahl. “Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Food Products in Japan.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(2003):222-231.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). “Idenshi-kumikae-shokuhin ni kansuru Hyouji ni tsuite (About the labeling on genetically modified food products).” (2001). Internet site: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/0103/tp0329-2c.html (Accessed July, 2008).
Parcell, J. L. “An Initial Look at the Tokyo Grain Exchange Non-GMO Soybean Contract.”Journal of Agribusiness 19(2001):85-92.
Rucker, R. R., W. N. Thurman, and J. K. Yoder. “Estimating the Structure of Market Reaction to News: Information Events and Lumber.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(2005):482-500.
Tokyo Grain Exchange. Annual Report 2002. Tokyo: Tokyo Grain Exchange, 2002. Tokyo Grain Exchange. Tokyo Kokumotsu Shouhin-tirihiki-jyo Gojyu-nen-shi (Fifty Year History of Tokyo Grain Exchange). Tokyo: Tokyo Grain Exchange, 2003.
Tsay, R. S., and G. C. Tiao. “Consistent Estimates of Autoregressive Parameters and Extended Sample Autocorrelation Function for Stationary and Nonstationary ARMA Models.” Journal of American Statistical Association 79(1984):84-96.
Tsay, Y., F. Alt, and L. Gordon. “The Market Reaction to Announced Deep Cuts in Capital Expenditures.” Managerial and Decision Economics 14(1993):1-14.
Tsay, Y., and K. Hung. “An Intervention Analysis for the Relationship between Capital Expenditure Decisions and the Market Value of Firms.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 4(1994):199-211.
Wachenheim, C. J., and T. V. Wechel. “The Influence of Environmental Impact Information on Consumer Willingness to Pay for Products Labeled as Free of Genetically Modified Ingredients.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 35(2004):1-13.
Available Versions of this Item
An Intervention Analysis on the Tokyo Grain Exchange Non- Genetically Modified and Conventional Soybean Futures Market. (deposited 20. Jan 2012 13:24)
- An intervention analysis on the Tokyo grain exchange non- genetically modified and conventional soybean futures market. (deposited 25. Jan 2012 02:37) [Currently Displayed]