Corsini, Lorenzo (2012): Unemployment Insurance Schemes, Liquidity Constraints and Re-employment: a three Country Comparison.
Download (912kB) | Preview
We examine how unemployment schemes and liquidity constraints affect re-employment probabilities and unemployment duration. In particular we investigate to which extent those schemes, through employment services and search requirements, can offset the expected perverse effect of benefits on reservation wages and search effort. Similarly, given that liquidity constraints and financial pressure should also affect reservation wage and search effort we analyze whether better economic conditions of individuals actually increase duration. We perform the analysis on Finland, Italy and Poland, countries that displays significant differences both in the UI schemes generosity and eligibility criteria and in the overall degree of social wealth and economic prosperity. Using a sample of newly unemployed from these countries, we perform and estimation of Cox hazard models and assess what variables are important in determining unemployment duration. Our findings suggest that even correctly designed UI schemes have a mixed effect: initially they give incentive to increase search effort, as the eligibility criteria impose certain search requirements, but with time they simply reduces liquidity constraints and thus increase duration. As for the direct effect of liquidity constraints and financial pressure we found that in Italy and Poland they appear to reduce unemployment duration but they are not relevant in Finland, suggesting that these aspects are not so important in countries that are particularly rich and with a developed welfare system.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Unemployment Insurance Schemes, Liquidity Constraints and Re-employment: a three Country Comparison|
|Keywords:||Unemployment Insurance, Liquidity constraints, Re-employment, Unemployment Duration|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C41 - Duration Analysis; Optimal Timing Strategies
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies > J65 - Unemployment Insurance; Severance Pay; Plant Closings
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies > J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
|Depositing User:||Lorenzo Corsini|
|Date Deposited:||11. Feb 2012 08:23|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 14:20|
Ashenfelter, O, Ashmore, D. and Deschenes, O. 2005: Do unemployment insurance recipients actively seek work? Evidence from randomized trials in four U.S. States. Journal of Econometrics 125: 53-75.
Atkinson, A and Micklewright, J. 1991: Unemployment Compensation and Labor Market Transitions: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 29: 1679-1727.
Bloemen, H. 2002: The relation between wealth and labour market transitions: an empirical study for the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Econometrics 17: 249-268.
Card, D, Chetty, R. and Weber, A. 2007: Cash-On-Hand and Competing Models of Intertemporal Behavior: New Evidence from the Labor Market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: 1511-1560.
Chetty, R. 2005: Why do Unemployment Benefits Raise Unemployment Durations? Moral Hazard vs. Liquidity. NBER Working Papers 11760.
Chetty R., 2008: Moral Hazard vs. Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance. Journal of Political Economy 116: 173-234.
Grambsch, P and Therneau, T. 1994: Proportional Hazards Tests and Diagnostics Based on Weighted Residuals. Biometrika 81: 515-526.
Klepinger, DH, Johnson, TR and Joesch, JM. 2002: Effects of unemployment insurance work-search requirements: The Maryland experiment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56: 3-22.
Manning A. 2009: You can't always get what you want: The impact of the UK Jobseeker's Allowance. Labour Economics 16: 239-250.
Nickell, S. and Layard, R. 1999: Labor market institutions and economic performance, Handbook of Labor Economics.
Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. Elsevier, volume 3: 3029-3084.
OECD. 2007. OECD Employment Outlook 2007. OECD Publishing: Paris.
OECD. 2009. OECD Employment Outlook 2009. OECD Publishing: Paris.