Xiao, Erte (2012): Justification and cooperation.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (509kB) | Preview
The need for justification is a widely observed social phenomenon. This paper develops a theoretical framework and reports laboratory evidence to show how pure justification pressure affects cooperative behavior in economic exchange environments. In a one-shot anonymous interaction, compared with the case when the behavior is simply observed by the audience, individuals are more likely to act on what they believe the audience thinks they should do when they also have to explain the decisions to the audience. When it is salient that the audience thinks one should cooperate, justification pressure significantly promotes cooperation even absent negative consequences for non-cooperative behavior. We discuss the implications of our findings for shaping institutional design to promote cooperation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Justification and cooperation|
|Keywords:||justification, accountability, cooperation, social norms, experimental economics|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Economics; Underlying Principles
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D84 - Expectations; Speculations
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
|Depositing User:||Erte Xiao|
|Date Deposited:||05. Mar 2012 01:28|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 09:50|
Aimone, J. and Houser, D. 2011. “Beneficial Betrayal Aversion,” PLoS ONE, 6(3): e17725. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017725
Andreoni, J. and Rao, J. 2011. “The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism”, Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 513-520
Bicchieri,C. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms, Cambridge University Press, 2006
Bicchieri, C. and Xiao, E. 2009 "Do the right thing: But only if others do so", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.22(2), 191-208.
Bohnet, I. and Richard Z. “Trust, Risk and Betrayal.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2004, 55 (4), 467-484.
Brandts, J. and Garofalo, O. 2010. “Gender pairings and accountability effects”. Working paper.
Cialdini, R. B.; Kallgren, C. A. and Raymond R.1990,"A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
Cooter, R. D. “Expressive Law and Economics, Journal of Legal Studies 27(2), 585-608
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing.” Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 407-428.
Cox, J. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46, 260–281.
Fehr, E. and Fischbacher,U. “Social norms and human cooperation.” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 2004, 8 (4), 185-190.
Fischbacher, Urs (2007): z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments, Experimental Economics 10(2), 171-178.
Gächter, S. Nosenzo, D. and Sefton, M. (forthcoming) "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences?" Journal of the European Economic Association
Gneezy, U., Rustichini, A. 2000a. A Fine Is A Price. Journal of Legal Studies. 29(1), 1-17.
Harvey, M. D. and Enzle, M. E. “A cognitive model of social norms for understanding the transgression-helping effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41, 866-875.
Houser, D. Xiao, E., McCabe, M. and Smith, M. 2008. “When punishment fails: Research on sanctions, intentions and non-cooperation”, Games and Economic Behavior, 62 (2), 509-532.
Kahan, D. M. (1998) “Social Meaning and the Economic Analysis of Crime. Journal of Legal Studies 27(2), 661-672.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468
Krupka, E. L. and Weber, R. (2009); “The Focusing and Informational Effects of Norms on Pro Social Behavior” The Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3):307-320.
De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., De Cremer, D., De Rooij, M. (2007). “Justifying Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Justification Pressures and Tacit Coordination Under Environmental Uncertainty”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 33(12), 1648-60
De Cremer and Van Dijk (2009) “Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymmetry and accountability”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 109, 45-55
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255-275
Li, J., Xiao, E., Houser, D. and Montague, R. 2009, “Neural responses to sanction threats in two-party economic exchange”, PNAS. September 29, vol. 106 no. 39, 16835-16840
Linardi, S. McConnell, M. A. (2011) “No Excuses for Good Behavior: Volunteering and the Social Environment” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 5-6, 445-454
McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., Smith, V. 2003. Positive reciprocity and intention in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations. 52(2), 267-275.
Model Business Corporate Act (2008) section 8.30, 2008 Pahlke, J., Strasser, S. and Vieider, F. M. (2011). “Risk-Taking for Others under Accountability”, working paper
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46-62.
Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 1-17.
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. (1998). Constructive decision making in a social context: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Working paper, Stanford University.
Simonson, I., & Nye, P. (1992). The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 416-446.
Sunstein, C. R. “On the Expressive Function of Law”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1996,144. 2021-2031
Shalvi. S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J.J. De Dreu, C. K.W. 2011. “Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 115,181–190
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 227-236.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376.
Vieider, F.M., 2010. “Separating Real Incentives and Accountability”. Working paper.
Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181-195.
Available Versions of this Item
Justification and cooperation. (deposited 21. Jan 2012 23:21)
Justification and cooperation. (deposited 11. Feb 2012 09:08)
- Justification and cooperation. (deposited 05. Mar 2012 01:28) [Currently Displayed]
- Justification and cooperation. (deposited 11. Feb 2012 09:08)