Paving the Way for Unfair Competition: The Imposition of EU Anti-Dumping Duties on Ceramic Tiles from China

Kasteng, Jonas (2012): Paving the Way for Unfair Competition: The Imposition of EU Anti-Dumping Duties on Ceramic Tiles from China. Published in:

Abstract

The report identifies concerns with the EU anti-dumping instrument, as applied today, regardless of the fact that the investigation procedures and methods might be in line with the current regulation and practice. The report's arguments are based on the recent anti-dumping investigation – and imposition of anti-dumping measures – on imports of ceramic tiles from China, but the observations and conclusions from the analysis are valid for most EU anti-dumping investigations. The report observes that price dumping is evaluated differently depending on whether the product is manufactured in the EU or imported from third countries. What is considered to be price dumping when imported is considered normal competition for a product manufactured in the EU. This is due to the fact that spatial price differentiation within the EU is covered by competition rules, and that competition rules have higher requirements for market share and price undercutting than the anti-dumping legislation. The report, accordingly, advocates that the criteria for imposing anti-dumping duties should be harmonized to the EU competition rules in order to ensure fair competition on the EU market. In the absence of a reformed anti-dumping regulation, the anti-dumping measures will most likely only contribute to a distorted competition where the complaining EU manufacturing industry will be protected to the detriment of the consumers.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: anti-dumping; dumping; competition; anti-trust; competition law; China; EU; ceramic tiles; fair competition; protectionism; trade defence instruments; trade remedies; European Commission; Union interest test; public interest test; TDI
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L61 - Metals and Metal Products ; Cement ; Glass ; Ceramics; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H32 - Firm

References

Budetta et al, 2007, Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements, WTO Economic Research and Statistics Division.

De Gucht, K, 2010, Speaking Points: Anti-dumping cases state of play and perspectives, Oral Questions, European Parliament (on 24 November 2010).

European Commission, 2009, Communication from the Commission – Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings, Information from European Union Institutions and Bodies, Official Journal of the European Union 24.2.2009.

European Commission, 2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No. 258/2011, of 16 March 2011, imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China, Official Journal of the European Union 17.3.2011.

European Commission, 2011, EU begins modernization review of Trade Defence Instruments, Press release (on 28 October 2011).

European Council, 2009, Council Regulation (EC) No. 1225/2009, of 30 November 2009, on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (codified version), Official Journal of the European Union 22.12.2009.

European Council, 2011, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 917/2011, of 12 September 2011, imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China, Official Journal of the European Union 15.9.2011.

Hoekman, B, 2003, Economic Development, Competition Policy and the WTO, World Bank and CEPR.

Knorr, A, 2004, Antidumping rules vs. competition rules, Institute for World Economics and International Management, Universität Bremen.

Nielsen, H, 1994, Brister i förbudet mot underprissättning, Ekonomisk Debatt 1994, arg 22, nr 7.

Swedish Competition Authority, 2010, Konkurrensreglerna, Konkurrensverket, Sweden.

Swedish National Board of Trade, 2009, Antitrust instead of antidumping in the Community’s bilateral trade agreements – The contribution of trade to a new EU growth strategy (Part 4), National Board of Trade, Sweden.

Wooton, I and Zanardi, M, 2002, Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-Trust, University of Glasgow and CEPR.

WTO, 1994, Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994.