Pervaiz, Zahid and Chani, Muhammad Irfan and Jan, Sajjad Ahmad and Chaudhary, Amatul R. (2011): Gender inequality and economic growth: a time series analysis for Pakistan. Published in: Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research , Vol. 10, No. 4 (2011): pp. 434-439.
Download (342kB) | Preview
This paper attempts to analyze the impact of gender inequality on economic growth of Pakistan. An annual time series data for the period of 1972-2009 has been used in this study. We have regressed growth rate of real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita on labour force growth, investment, trade openness and a composite index of gender inequality. The results reveal that labour force growth, investment and trade openness have statistically significant and positive impact whereas gender inequality has a significant and negative effect on economic growth of Pakistan.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Gender inequality and economic growth: a time series analysis for Pakistan|
|Keywords:||Gender inequality; Economic Growth; Time Series|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
|Depositing User:||Muhammad Irfan Chani|
|Date Deposited:||08. Mar 2012 06:29|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 12:30|
1. United Nations Development Programme, 2010. Human Development Report 2010 —20th Anniversary Edition: The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. New York, USA: United Nations Development Programme.
2. World Bank, 2001. World Development Report: Attacking Poverty. Washington DC: The World Bank.
3. Sen, Amartya, 1989. Women's Survival as a Development Problem. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43(2):14-29.
4. Sen, Amartya, 1992. Missing Women. British Medical Journal, 304, pp. 587-588.
5. Sen, Amartya, 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
6. Summers, L., 1994. Investing in All the People. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
7. Murthi, M., Guio, A.-C. and Dreze, J., 1995. Mortality, Fertility, and Gender Bias in India: A District-Level Analysis. Population, and Development Review 21(4):745- 82.
8. Hill, A. and King, E., 1995. Women's Education in Development Countries. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Lagerlof, N., 1999. Gender Inequality, Fertility, and Growth. University of Sydney, Department of Economics, Australia.
10. Klasen, S. 1999. Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence from Cross-Country Regressions. Policy Research Report, Engendering Development, Working Paper No. 7. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
11. Seguino, Stephanie, 2000. Accounting for Gender in Asian Economic Growth. Feminist Economics 6(3): 27–58.
12. Klasen, S., 2002. Low Schooling for Girls, Slower Growth for All? Cross-Country Evidence on the Effect of Gender Inequality in Education on Economic Development. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 16, No. 3 (2002), pp. 345-373.
13. Klasen, S., 2006. Gender and Pro-Poor Growth,’’ in Lukas Menkoff, ed. Pro-Poor Growth: Policy and Evidence, pp. 151–71. Berlin: Dunker and Humblot.
14. Knowles, S., Lorgelly, P. K. and Owen, P. D., 2002. Are Educational Gender Gaps a Brake on Economic Development? Some Cross-Country Empirical Evidence. Oxford Economic Papers 54(1):118-49.
15. Klasen, S. and Lamanna, F., 2009. The Impact of Gender Inequality in Education and Employment on Economic Growth: New Evidence for a Panel of Countries', Feminist Economics, 15: 3, 91-132.
16. Galor, O., and Weil, D. N., 1996. The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth. American Economic Review 86(2):374-87.
17. Benavot, A., 1989. Education, gender, and economic development: a cross-national study. Sociology of Education, 62, 14-32.
18. King, Elizabeth, Klasen, M. S. and Porter, Maria, 2008. Gender and Development Challenge Paper. Paper prepared for 2008 round of Copenhagen Consensus Project. Mimeographed, Copenhagen Consensus Center.
19. Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.W., 2001. International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 53(3), 541-563.
20. Barro, R., and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1995. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Dollar, D., and Gatti, R., 1999. Gender Inequality, Income, and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women? Policy Research Report, Engendering Development, Working Paper No. 1. Washington, D.C.
22. Klasen, Stephan, 2003. Low Schooling for Girls, Slower Growth for all? Cross-Country Evidence on the Effect of Gender Inequality in Education on Economic Development: Erratum. The World Bank Economic Review, 17 (2), 315-333.
23. Baldwin, Marjorie and Johnson, William G, 1992. Estimating the Employment Effects of Wage Discrimination, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), 446-455.
24. Thomas, D., 1997. Income, Expenditures, and Health Outcomes: Evidence on Intrahousehold Resource Allocation. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, and H. Alderman, eds., Intra-household Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods, and Policy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Sinha, Nistha, Raju, Dhushyanth and Andrew Morrison, 2007. Gender Equality, Poverty and Economic Growth, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4349.
26. Erturk, Korkut & Cagatay, Nilufer, 1995. Macroeconomic Consequences of Cyclical and Secular Changes in Feminization: An Experiment at Gendered Macro-modeling, World Development, 23(11), 1969-1977.
27. Busse, Matthias & Spielmann, Christian, 2006. Gender Inequality and Trade, Review of International Economics, 14(3), 362-379.
28. Esteve-Volart, Berta, 2009. Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India, mimeo, York University, Toronto.
29. Ahmed, N. and Bukhari, S., 2007. Gender Inequality and Trade Liberalization: A Case Study of Pakistan. Research Report No. 67. Karachi, Pakistan: Social Policy and Development Center.
30. Granger, C. and Newbold, P., 1974. Spurious Regressions in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
31. Philips, P.C.B., 1986. Understanding Spurious Regressions in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 311-340.
32. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the Estimation for Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
33. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A., 1981. Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
34. Johansen, S., 1988. Statistical Analysis of Co-integrating Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
35. Johansen, S. and Juselius, K., 1990. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Co-integration - with Applications to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
36. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. and Mestre, R., 1998. Error-correction Mechanism Test for Co-integration in Single Equation Framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
37. World Bank, 2009. World Development Indicators (WDI) Online Database. Washington D.C., USA: The World Bank.
38. Government of Pakistan, 2010. The Pakistan Economic Survey 2009-2010. Islamabad, Pakistan: Finance Division, Government of Pakistan.
39. Pervaiz, Z. and Chaudhary, A.R., 2010. Class Division, Social Cohesion and Economic Growth. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP- Lambert Academic Publishing.