Hynes, Brian (2011): Economics: The logic & scientific distortion.
Download (1MB) | Preview
How is it that schools of economic factions have created rifts where economists cannot bare to be in the same room as one another. Investigation of this question examines fundamental economic theory and identifies the root cause of the rift is the perplexing disconnect between the scientific method and logical testing. Fundamentally, the prime rift is between economists who use deductive reasoning and those who use positive empirical evidence. To illuminate the effect of this rift, this article will disseminate a couple fundamental economic topics under scrutiny: Defining Growth and Forecasting. The resulting differences and history shows strong support for consideration of deductive reasoning over current methodology. The reality is that legitimate theories should channel central debate on the current “given” modern theory is not debated at all, but instead a mainstream economists insist a “bridge” exists today, known as the Neoclassical Synthesis of the 20th century. This has perverted economic thought to the point where debate will not even come under consideration on the fundamental level. Therefore, the Positive Empiricism Approach (See: “scientific”) has inherited a foundation built upon, ironically, a normative nature. Failure of the scientific approach, empirically and logically, proves that mainstream neo-Keynesian economics promotes externalities in waves that deliver far more impact than simply direct practice. The school's influence and has potential to be more destructive potential than any time in history.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economics: The logic & scientific distortion|
|English Title:||Economics: The logic & scientific distortion|
|Keywords:||Austrian Economics, Hayek, Von Mises, Comparative theory, keynesian theory, Logical reason, logic, aristotle,|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics; Role of Economists; Market for Economists
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics
|Depositing User:||Brian Hynes|
|Date Deposited:||17. Mar 2012 12:38|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 00:35|
“Greenspan admits mistakes in subprime mess” MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20759709/ns/business-eye_on_the_economy/ Sanchez, Daniel James. “Ben Bernanke was Incredibly, Uncannily, Wrong. 2009. http://mises.org/daily/3588 Sanchez, Daniel James. Greenwald, Igor. “Some Questions for Bernanke’s Critics” 2010. http://www.moneyshow.com/investing/article/29/GlobalEditor-22884/Some-Questions-for-Bernankes-Critics?scode=020648 www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20110107a.htm Long, Roderick T. 2006. "Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman."Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9, no. 3: 3-23. EconLit, EBSCOhost (accessed April 22, 2011). Menger, Carl Preconceptions of Economic Science (1900) Mises, Ludwig : "The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics “[1,2] http://mises.org/hsofase/ ch2sec3.asp Mises, Ludwig: "The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics”  Friedman, Milton “A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960” http://www.cato.org/events/031121bf.html Friedman, Milton “A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960” Greenspan, Alan “Gold and Economic Freedom” http://www.constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm “We’re all socialists now” http://www.newsweek.com/2009/02/06/we-are-all-socialists-now.html Smith, Barry. 1990. "Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics." History of Political Economy 22, no. 5: 263-288. EconLit, EBSCOhost (accessed April 22, 2011). Roubini Political Biases in Fiscal Policy: Reconsidering the case for the Maastricht fiscal criteria - Monetary and Fiscal Policy in an Integrated Europe, 1995 Friedman, Bernanke, Ben. Congressional Hearing 101st session. 5 July, 2006 Bernanke, Ben. Congressional Hearing 102nd session. 17 July, 2007 Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929-1932". 73rd US Congress, 2d session, Senate document no. 124, page 7. http://library.bea.gov/u?/SOD,888 European Parliament, Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy: Beyond GDP Studyhttp://www.beyond-gdp.eu/download/bgdp-bp-goossens.pdf Desecration of Patriotism, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-gellman/bushs-worst-legacy----the_b_116894.html Robert Batemarco GNP, PPR, and the Standard of Living by Robert Batemarco, from the journal Review of Austrian Economics “Hayek on Keynes” , 1979 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqU-AZh-wqU Rockwell, Lewis, “Predicting Reality” “Hayek on Keynes” , 1979 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqU-AZh-wqU Horwitz, steven “On Hayek” http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1974/press.html Aguilar, Victor Did Mises and Hayek Predict the Great Depression? http://axiomaticeconomics.com/MisesHayek.php Eddlem, Thomas, “Austrian Economics Rising” Down Aguilar, Victor Did Mises and Hayek Predict the Great Depression? http://axiomaticeconomics.com/MisesHayek.php Eddlem, Thomas, “Austrian Economics Rising” Down With the Present http://www.lewrockwell.com/eddlem/eddlem38.1.html Heilbroner, Robert (2000). The Worldly Philosophers. pp. 278–8. ISBN 0671634828. Taleb, Nassim. “Taleb Nassim is angry with economists today”http://www.youtube