Albu, Lucian-Liviu (2007): A model to estimate informal economy at regional level: Theoretical and empirical investigation.
Download (268kB) | Preview
Many problems emerge since it is widely believed that high tax rates and ineffective tax collection by government are the main causes contributing to the rise of the informal economy. Already the economists have established a relationship between tax rates and tax evasion or size of the informal economy. The higher is the level of taxation, the greater incentive is to participate in informal economic activities and escape taxes. At the macroeconomic level, there is a number of so-called indirect methods used to estimate the size and dynamics of informal economy, reported in literature as “Monetary Approach”, “Implicit Labour Supply Method”, “National Accountancy”, “Energy Consumption Method”, etc. Unfortunately, many times there are huge differences among the estimated shares of informal or underground economy obtained by various methods. For instance, in case of Romania the figures are between about 20% of GDP, obtained on the base of the energy consumption method and more than 45% computed by using the monetary approach. Also, the figures reported by the National Institute for Statistics (NIS), based on national accounts methodology, increased (mainly due to changes in methodology) from about 5% in 1992, to 18% in 1997 and to 20-22% after 2000. Adding to these figures about 7% of GDP, representing the estimated level for self-consumption in case of a rural household, legal non-registered but informal, resulted that last years the informal economy is responsible of 27-29% of national economy. In this article, coming from certain general accepted finding of the theory in matter of modelling underground economy, we concentrate on evaluating analytically the limit-values of certain important parameters involved in models used to estimate the size of underground economy and to explain the mechanisms of its dynamics. Then we shall simulate some exercises on available data. The second goal of the paper is to report some conclusions of our investigation based on data supplied by special surveys organised in Romania. Also, in order to see since certain hypotheses (referring to the complex transmission mechanism from the tax policy decisions to the effective implication of agents into informal economy) are statistically verified and to extend the study from the aggregate level to a deep research inside the population set in regions, we used data supplied by this special large survey, which already were processed and are available in our database.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Institute for Economic Forecasting, Bucharest|
|Original Title:||A model to estimate informal economy at regional level: Theoretical and empirical investigation|
|Keywords:||informal economy; invisible sector; tax rate; probability of detection; risk-aversion; computer assistance|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General
H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H31 - Household
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy
|Depositing User:||Lucian Liviu Albu|
|Date Deposited:||30. Jun 2007|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 20:36|
Albu, L.-L. (1995): “Underground Economy and Fiscal Policies Modeling”, ACE-Phare Project, Université de Paris I, Centre d'Etudes Prospectives d'Economie Mathematique Appliquées à la Planification, August. Albu, L.-L. (2004): “Estimating the Size of Underground Economy in Romania”, Tax Evasion, Underground Economy and Fiscal Policies in Candidate Countries (Case of Romania), GDN Project, Prague, June. Albu, L.-L., Daianu, D., Pauna, B., and Pavelescu, F. (1998): “Endogenous Cycles and Underground Economy in Europe”, MEET- IV conference on the East European Economies in Transition, University of Leicester – CEES, 20-21 June. Albu, L.-L., Kim, B.-Y., and Duchene, G. (2002a): An Attempt to Estimate the Size of Informal Economy Based on Household Behaviour Modeling, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 1 (9), Bucharest. Albu, L.-L., Kim, B.-Y., and Duchene, G. (2002b): Households’ Activities in Informal Economy: Size and Behavioural Aspects, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 3-4 (11-12), Bucharest. Albu, L.-L. and Nicolae, M. (2002): Use of Households Survey Data to Estimate the Size of the Informal Economy in Romania, The Informal Economy in the EU Accession Countries: Size, Scope, Trends and Challenges to the Process of EU Enlargement, Network for Integration of Central and Eastern-European Countries into the European Union, March, Sofia. Allingham, M.G. and Sandmo, A. (1972): Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis, Journal of Public Economics, November, 1(3-4). Blades, D. (1982): “The Hidden Economy and the National Accounts”, OECD (Occasional Studies), Paris, pp. 28-44. Clotfelter, C.T. (1983): Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65. Daianu, D. and Albu, L.-L. (1997): ”Institutions, Strain and the Underground Economy”. International Conference on the Importance of the Underground Economy in Economic Transition, University of Zagreb. The Davidson Institute Working Paper Series, 98. Duchene, G. (coordonator), Adair, P., Albu, L.-L., Ivan-Ungureanu, C., Neff, R., and Tanase, F. (1998): “Informal economy in Romania”, ACE-Phare Project, ROSES, Paris, September. French, R., Balaita, M. and Ticsa M. (1999): “Estimating The Size And Policy Implications Of The Underground Economy In Romania”, US Department of the Treasury, Office of Technical Assistance, Bucharest, August. Gibson, B. and Kelley, B. (1994): A Classical Theory of the Informal Sector, The Manchester School, Vol. LXII, 1. Gutmann, P. M. (1977): The Subterranean Economy, Financial Analysts Journal, 34:1, pp. 24-27. Isachsen, A.J., and Strom, S. (1985): The size and growth of the hidden economy in Norway, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 31. No.1. Lemieux, T., Fortin, B., and Fréchette, P. (1994): ”The Effect of Taxes on Labor Supply in the Underground Economy”, The American Economic Review, March, 84(1). Pencavel, J.H. (1979), A Note on Income Tax Evasion, Labour Supply, and Non-linear Tax Schedules, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 12. Pestieau, P. (1989): L' Economie souterraine, Hachette, Pluriel. Schneider, Friedrich (2002): The Size and Development of the Shadow Economies and Shadow Economy Labor Force of 22 Transition and 21 OECD Countries: What Do We Really Know?, The Informal Economy in the EU Accession Countries: Size, Scope, Trends and Challenges to the Process of EU Enlargement, Network for Integration of Central and Eastern-European Countries into the European Union, March, Sofia. *** National Institute of Statistics (1996-2006): Population income, expenditure and consumption, Romanian Statistical Yearbook 1996-2006, Bucharest.