Simplice A, Asongu (2012): Are financial benefits of financial globalization questionable until greater domestic financial development has taken place?
Download (197kB) | Preview
Purpose – The issue of which financial initial conditions are necessary to materialize the benefits of financial globalization remains open to debate in the literature. In this paper, we try to put some empirical structure on the concept of financial threshold conditions in order to give policymakers guidance on the Kose et al.(2011) and Henry(2007) hypothesis. Its object is to assess if financial benefits of financial globalization are questionable until greater domestic financial development has taken place in developing countries.
Design/methodology/approach – In framing the financial dimension in a more concrete and tractable manner, we probe into the concerns of how domestic financial initial dynamics of depth(economic and financial systems), efficiency(banking and financial systems), activity (banking and financial systems) and size play-out in the financial development benefits of financial globalization. The estimation approach consists of assessing the impact of financial globalization through-out the conditional distributions of domestic financial development dynamics.
Findings – The introduction of previously missing financial dimensions into the debate generates a number of important findings. Only financial initial(threshold) conditions in depth and size are necessary to materialize the benefits of financial globalization. Domestic dynamics of efficiency and activity(credit) do not confirm the hypothesis.
Practical implications – Depending on the context of sampled countries, the appropriate role of policy has always been either to stem the tide of capital flows or encourage them. Policymakers who have been viewing their challenges exclusively from the later perspective for benefits in growth(finance) might be getting the financial dynamics badly wrong.
Originality/value – Blanket financial development policies may not reap the financial benefits of financial globalization until domestic financial dynamics of depth, efficiency, activity and size are critically considered. The introduction of the last three previously missing components in the literature sheds more light on the globalization-development nexus.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Are financial benefits of financial globalization questionable until greater domestic financial development has taken place?|
|Keywords:||Banking; International investment; Financial integration; Development|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F40 - General
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F30 - General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General
F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration
F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F21 - International Investment ; Long-Term Capital Movements
|Depositing User:||Simplice Anutechia Asongu|
|Date Deposited:||26. Mar 2012 02:26|
|Last Modified:||03. May 2015 20:13|
Asongu, S. A.,(2010), “Bank efficiency and openness in Africa: do income levels matter?”, MPRA Paper No. 27011.
Asongu, S. A., (2011a), “Law, finance, economic growth and welfare: why does legal origin matter?”, MPRA Paper No. 33868.
Asongu, S. A., (2011b), “Law and finance in Africa”, MPRA Paper No. 34080.
Asongu, S. A., (2011c), “Finance and democracy in Africa”, MPRA Paper No. 35500.
Asongu, S. A., (2011d), “Why do French civil-law countries have higher levels of financial efficiency”, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2(2), pp.94-108.
Asongu, S. A., (2011e), “New financial intermediary development indicators for developing countries”, MPRA Paper No. 30921.
Asongu, S. A.,(2011f), “Globalization, financial allocation efficiency and regional economic dynamics: asymmetric panel evidence from Africa”, MPRA Paper No. 33901.
Asongu, S. A.,(2012a), “The political economy of development assistance: peril to government quality dynamics in Africa”, MPRA Paper No.36543.
Asongu, S. A.,(2012b), “Reversed economics and inhumanity of development development assistance in Africa”, MPRA Paper No.36542.
Bhagwati, J.,(1998), “The Capital Myth. The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Dollars”, Foreign Affairs, 7(3), pp.7-12.
Billger, S. M., & Goel, R. K., (2009),“Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption? Cross-country quantile regression estimates”, Journal of Development Economics, 90, pp.299-305.
Dornbusch, R.,(1996, August/September), “It’s Time for a Financial Transactions Tax”, International Economy.
Dornbusch, R., (1998, May), “Capital Controls: An Idea Whose Time is Past”, Essays in International Finance, No. 207.
Fischer, S., (1997), “Capital Account Liberalization and the Role of the IMF”, Annual Meetings Speech on September 19th, 1997 (accessed on 17/03/2012: http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/1997/091997.htm).
Fischer, S.,(1998), “Capital Account Liberalisation and the Role of the IMF”, in “Should the IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility?”, Essays in International Finance, Department of Economics, Princeton University, 207, pp.1-10.
Henry, P.B.,(2007), “Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence and Speculation”, Journal of Economic Literature, XLV:887-935.
Koenker, R., & Hallock, F.K.,(2001), “Quantile regression”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, pp.143-156.
Kose, M.A., Prasad, E. S., & Taylor, A.D.,(2011), “Threshold in the process of international financial integration”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(1), pp.147-179.
Kose, M.A., Prasad, E.S., & Rogoff, K., Wei, S.J.,(2006), “Financial globalization: a reappraisal”, IMF Staff Papers, 56(1), pp.8-62.
Obstfeld, M.,(1998), “The Global Capital Market: Benefactor or Menace?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), pp.9-30.
Okada, K., & Samreth, S.,(2012), “The effect of foreign aid on corruption: A quantile regression approach”, Economic Letters, 11, pp.240-243.
Prasad, E.S., & Rajan, R.G.,(2008), “A pragmatic approach to capital account liberalization”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), pp.149-172.
Rodrik, D.,(1998), “Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility?” Essays in International Finance, No. 207(Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University).
Rodrik, D., & Subramanian, A.,(2009), “Why did financial globalization disappoint?”, IMF Staff Papers, 56(1), pp.112-138.
Rogoff, K., S., (1999), “International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), pp.21-42.
Stiglitz, J.,(2000), “Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth and Instability”, World Development, 28(6), pp.1075-1086.
Solow, R., M.,(1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), pp.65-94.
Summers, L.H.,(2000), “International Financial Crises: Causes, Prevention and Cures”, American Economic Review, 90(2), pp.1-16.