Raihan, Selim (2011): Economic Corridors in South Asia: Exploring the Benefits of Market Access and Trade Facilitation. Forthcoming in:
Download (433kB) | Preview
This paper shows that there are significant prospects of rise in intra-regional trade among the four Eastern South Asian countries. The partial equilibrium modelling exercise helps identify the products with high export potentiality. Simulation exercise based on a global general equilibrium model suggests that though there are prospects of welfare gains for India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, there are risks of welfare loss for Bangladesh and other LDCs in South Asia out of FTA in goods under the SAFTA agreement because of the fact that the trade diversion effects could be larger than trade creation effects for these countries. However, such welfare loss could be well compensated by the rise in welfare due to improvement in trade facilitation among the South Asian countries. It also appears that the gains from trade facilitation are much bigger than the gains from trade liberalisation. Interactions with the stakeholders in Bangladesh helped identify a number of factors which are constraining trade in Eastern South Asia sub-region. These include inadequate facilities at the land and sea ports, weak physical infrastructure, inefficient bureaucracy, corruption and several forms of NTBs. Removal of such trade barriers though improvement in trade facilitation measures will generate significant rise in trade among these countries.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economic Corridors in South Asia: Exploring the Benefits of Market Access and Trade Facilitation|
|Keywords:||Economic Corridor; Market Access; Trade Facilitation; SAFTA|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
|Depositing User:||Selim Raihan|
|Date Deposited:||07. Apr 2012 12:10|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2013 10:29|
Ahmed, S. Ghani, E. (2010), “Making Regional Cooperation Work for South Asia’s Poor”, Chapter 2 in Ahmed, S., Kelegama, S. and Ghani, E. (eds), Promoting Economic Cooperation in South Asia. Sage Publications India Ltd.
Bandara, J. S. and Yu, W. (2003). “How Desirable is the South Asian Free Trade Area? A Quantitative Economic Assessment.” In Greenaway, DS. (ed.) World Economy: Global Trade Policy 2003 , Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishing
Baysan, T., Panagariya, A and Pitigala, N. (2006). “Preferential Trading In South Asia”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3813, January 2006
Coulibaly, S. (2004). “On the Assessment of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects of Developing RTAs,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting 2005 of the Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics on Resource Economics, Technology, and Sustainable Development. (available at http://www.wif.ethz.ch/resec/sgvs/078.pdf)
Das, S. and Pohit, S. (2006), "Quantifying the Transport, Regulatory and Other Costs of Indian Overland Exports to Bangladesh,” The World Economy, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1227-1242.
De, P and Raihan, S. (2010) “Unlocking India – Bangladesh Trade Potential: Emerging Issues and the Way Forward”, Mimeo
De, P. (2010) “Transit and Trade Barriers in South Asia: Multilateral Obligations and Development Perspective”, Law and Development Review, Vol. 3, No 1.
DeRosa, D. A. and Govindan, K. (1995). “Agriculture, Trade, and Regionalism in South Asia.” Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 7, Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
ECA (2000), Economic Commission for Africa, “The Economic and Welfare Impacts of the EU-Africa Economic Partnership Agreements: The Analytical Methodology - the GTAP and SMART Models and related Databases,” 2000.
Govindan, K. (1994). “A South Asian Preferential Trading Arrangement: Implications for Agricultural Trade and Economic Welfare.” Mimeo, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Hassan, M.K. (2001). “Is SAARC a Viable Economic Block? Evidence from gravity model”, Journal of Asian Economics, Volume 12, No. 2, pp.263-290.
Hertel, T.W. (1997), Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hirantha, S.W. (2004). “From SAPTA to SAFTA: Gravity Analysis of South Asian Free Trade” Paper presented at the European Trade Study Group (ETSG) 2004 Programme, September, Nottingham.
Laird, S. and Yeats, A. (1986), “The UNCTAD Trade Policy Simulation Model: A Note on Methodology, Data and Uses,” UNCTAD Discussion Paper No. 19, Geneva, 1986.
Limao, N., and A.J. Venables. 2001. “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs and Trade” World Bank Economic Review 15: 451-479.
Milner, C., Morrissey, O. and McKay, A. (2002), “Some Simple Analytics of the Trade and Welfare Eﬀects of Economic Partnership Agreements: The Case of the EU-EAC”, mimeo, CREDIT, University of Nottingham.
Pigato, M., Farah, C., Itakura, K., Jun, K., Martin, W., Murrell, K. and Srinivasan, T.G. (1997). “South Asia’s Integration into the World Economy.” Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Pohit, S. and Taneja, N. (2003), "India’s Informal Trade with Bangladesh: A Qualitative Assessment”, The World Economy, Vol.26, No. 8, pp. 1187-1214
Pursell, G. (2004). “An India-Bangladesh Free Trade Agreement? – Some Potential Economic Costs and Benefits”, Washington. DC, The World Bank (mimeo).
Rahman, M. M. (2003). “A Panel Data of Bangladesh’s Trade: The Gravity Model Approach”, Paper presented at the European Trade Study Group (ETSG) 2003 Programme. September. Madrid.
Rahman, M., Shadat, W., and Das, N.C. (2006). “Trade Potential in SAFTA: An Application of Augmented Gravity Model”, Centre for Policy Dialogue, Occasional Paper 61.
Raihan, S. and Razzaque, A. (2007). “Regional Trading Arrangements (RTAs) in South Asia: Implications for the Bangladesh Economy”, in Raihan, S. and Razzaque, A.(eds.) WTO and Regional Trading Arrangement: Quantitative Assessment of Potential Implications for Bangladesh. Pathak Samabesh, Dhaka.
Rodríguez-Delgado, J.D. (2007). “SAFTA: Living in a World of Regional Trade Agreements”, IMF Working Paper, 07/23.
Sengupta, N., and Banik, A. (1997). “Regional trade and investment: case of SAARC.” Economic and Political Weekly 32 (November 15-21): pp.2930-2931.
Shorma, A.B. (2010) “India, Nepal agree to ensure South Asian Connectivity”, newsmandu.com
Srinivasan, T.N. and Canonero, G. (1995). “Preferential Trading Arrangements in South Asia: Theory, Empirics and Policy.” New Haven: Yale University. Unpublished manuscript.
Subramanian, Uma and John Arnold, 2001, ‘Forging Subregional Links in Transportation and Logistics in South Asia’, Washington DC: World Bank.
Taneja, N., Sarvananthan, M., Karmacharya, B.K. and Pohit, S. (2004), "India’s Informal Trade with Sri Lanka and Nepal: An Estimation,” South Asia Economic Journal, vol.5, no.1, Jan.-June, pp. 27-54.
Tumbarello, P. (2006). “Are Regional Trade Agreements in Asia Stumbling or Building Blocks? Some Implications for the Mekong Countries”, Paper prepared for the seminar on Accelerating Development in the Mekong Region—the Role of Economic Integration, Siem Reap, Cambodia, June 26-27, 2006. (available at http://www.imf.org/external/ np/seminars/eng/ 2006/mekong/pt.pdf)
World Bank (2006). India-Bangladesh Bilateral Trade and Potential Free Trade Agreement: Bangladesh Development Series, Paper No: 13, World Bank Bangladesh Office, Dhaka.