Yalcintas, Altug (2010): The ‘Coase Theorem’ vs. Coase theorem proper: How an error emerged and why it remained uncorrected so long. Published in: Social Science Research Network No. SSRN-id1628163 (2010)
Download (206kB) | Preview
The question of what is the 'Coase Theorem?' has no simple answer. The majority of articles covering a variety of issues on the 'Coase Theorem' still misrepresent the main message of Coase (1960). The remaining controversy over the 'Coase Theorem' is because the literature on Coase (1960) has been locked into a pathway which was set out by Stigler’s 1996 book, The Theory of Price. Even almost 50 years after the publication of Coase’s original article, the consequence of the initial condition under which Coase’s contribution was first formulated (Stigler 1966) is not perfectly eliminated. The evolution of the 'Coase Theorem' has now become an example to intellectual path dependence in economics.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The ‘Coase Theorem’ vs. Coase theorem proper: How an error emerged and why it remained uncorrected so long|
|Keywords:||Ronald Coase, 'The Problem of Social Cost' (1960), The 'Coase Theorem,' George Stigler, Replication Failure, Intellectual Path Dependence|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B25 - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology
|Depositing User:||Altug Yalcintas|
|Date Deposited:||09. Apr 2012 13:14|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 18:01|
Aivazian, V. and J. L. Callen. 1981. ‘The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 24, No. 1 (April).
Akerlof, G. A. 1970 ‘The Markets for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 84, No. 3 (August).
Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz. 1972. ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’ American Economic Review Vol. 62, No.5 (December).
Arrow, K. 1962. ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’ Review of Economic Studies Vol.17 29, No. 3.
Arthur, B. 1989. ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events’ Economic Journal Vol. 99.
Buchanan, J. 1973. ‘Coase Theorem and the Theory of State’ Natural Resources Journal Vol. 13, No. 4.
Butler, M. R. and R. F. Garnett. 2003. ‘Teaching the Coase Theorem: Are We Getting it Right?’ Atlantic Economic Journal Vol. 31, No. 2 (June).
Charness, G., Frechette G. R., Qin C. Z. 2007. ‘Endogenous Transfers in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game: An Experimental Test of Cooperation and Coordination’ Games and Economic Behavior Vol. 60, No. 2.
Coase, R. 1937. ‘The Nature of The Firm’ Econometrica Vol. 2.
Coase, R. 1959. ‘The Federal Communications Commission’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 2, No. 1.
Coase, R. 1960. ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 3.
Coase, R. 1966. ‘Economics of Broadcasting and Government Policy’ American Economic Review Vol. 56, No. 2.
Coase, R. 1974a. ‘Lighthouse in Economics’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 17, No. 2.
Coase, R. 1974b. ‘Market for Goods and Market for Ideas’ American Economic Review Vol. 64, No. 2.
Coase, R. 1981. ‘The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Comment’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 24, No. 1 (April) 18
Coase, R. 1988b. The Firm, the Market, and the Law (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).
Coase, R. 1992a. ‘Nobel Prize Lecture’ In T. Frängsmyr (ed.) Les Prix Nobel – The Nobel Prizes 1991(Stockholm: Nobel Foundation).
Coase, R. 1993a. ‘Law and Economics at Chicago’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 36, No. 1.
Cohen, M. A. and V. Santhakumar. 2007. ‘Information Disclosure as Environmental Regulation: A Theoretical Analysis’ Environmental Resource Economics Vol. 37, No. 3.
Darge, R. C. 1973. ‘Coase Theorem Symposium – Introduction’ Natural Resources Journal Vol. 13, No. 4.
David, P. 1985. ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’ American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 2.
Elhauge, E. R. 1991. ‘Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judical-Review’ Yale Law Journal Vol. 101, No. 1.
Fox, G. 2007. ‘The Real Coase Theorems’ CATO Journal Vol. 27, No. 3 (Fall).
Frech, H. E. 1973. ‘Extended Coase Theorem and Long Run Equilibrium - Nonequivalence of Liability Rules and Property Rights’ Economic Inquiry Vol. 17, No. 2.
Friedman, D. Mimeo. ‘Swedes Get It Right’ Available Online at http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Coase_World.html [Accessed in December 2008].
Friedman, M. 1968. ‘The Role of Monetary Policy’ American Economic Review Vol. 58, No. 1
Gifford, A. 1974. ‘Externalities and Coase Theorem: Graphical Analysis’ Quarterly Review of Economics and Business Vol. 14, No. 4.
Gifford, A. and C. C. Stone. 1973. ‘Externalities, Liability, and Coase Theorem’ Western Economic Journal Vol. 11, No. 3.
Gross, O. 2003. ‘Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always be Constitutional’ Yale Law Journal Vol. 112, No. 5.
Halpin, A. 2007. ‘Disproving the Coase Theorem’ Economics and Philosophy Vol. 23, No. 3.
Hazlett, T. 1997. ‘Looking for Results?: Nobel Laureate Ronald Coase on Right, Resources, and Regulation’ Reasononline January Available Online at http://www.reason.com/news/show/30115.html [Accessed May 2007].
Hoffman, E. and M. L. Spitzer. 1982. ‘The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 25, No. 1.
Hoffman, E., K. Mccabe, K. Shachat, and V. Smith. 1994. ‘Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games’ Games and Economic Behavior Vol. 7, No. 3.
Hovenkamp, H. 1991. ‘Legal Policy and the Endowment Effect’ Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 20, No. 2.
Inada, K. I. and Kugak. 1973. ‘Limitations of Coase Theorem on Liability Rules’ Journal of Economic Theory Vol. 6, No. 6.
Jansen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. ‘Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’ Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 3.
Jolls, C., C. R. Sunstein, and R. Thaler. 1998. ‘A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics’ Stanford Law Review Vol. 50, No. 5.
Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1990. ‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ Journal of Political Economy Vol. 98, No. 6.
Kaplow, L. and S. Shavell. 1996. ‘Property Rules Versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis’ Harvard Law Review Vol. 109, 4.
Kelman, M. 1979. ‘Consumption Theory, Production Theory, and the Ideology in the Coase Theorem’ Southern California Law Review Vol. 52, No. 3.
Korobkin, R. 1998a. ‘Inertia and Preference in Contract Negotiation: The Psychological Power of Default Rules and Form Terms’ Vanderbilt Law Review Vol. 51, No. 6.
Korobkin, R. 1998b. ‘The Status Quo Bias and Contract Default Rules’ Cornell Law Review Vol. 83, No. 3.
Krier, J. E. and S. J. Schwab. 1995. ‘Property Rules and Liability Rules: The Cathedral in Another Light’ New York University Law Review Vol. 70, No. 2.
Krugman, P. 1991. ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’ Journal of Political Economy Vol. 99, No. 3 (June).
Lai, L. W. C. and C. W. Y. Hung. 2008. ‘The Inner Logic of the Coase Theorem and a Coasian Planning Research Agenda’ Environmental and Policy Planning Vol. 35, No. 2.
Lee, J. and H. Sabourina. 2007. ‘Coase Theorem, Complexity, and Transaction Costs’ Journal of Economic Theory Vol. 135, No. 1.
Lemley, M. A. 1995. ‘Intellectual Property and Shrink-wrap Licenses’ Southern California Law Review Vol. 68, No. 5.
Machado, J. A. 2008. ‘Public Policy Management in the Federative System: Wagers and Traps’ Dados-Revista de Ciencias Sociais Vol. 51, No. 2.
McCloskey, D. 1993. The Secret Sins of Economics (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press).
McCloskey, D. 1996. The Vices of Economists, the Virtues of the Bourgeois (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
McCloskey, D. 1998. ‘Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: A Comment on Zerbe and Medema’ In S. G. Medema (ed.) Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
Medema, S. G. 1994. ‘The Myth of Two Cases: What Coase is Really Saying’ Journal of Economic Issues Vol. 28 (March).
Medema, S. G. 1995. ‘Finding His Own Way: The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis’ In S. G. Medema (ed.) The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis (Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.).
Medema, S. G. 1999. ‘Legal Fiction: The Place of the Coase Theorem in Law and Economics’ Economics and Philosophy Vol. 15 (October).
Medema, S. G. 2002. ‘George Stigler and the Coase Theorem’ American Journal of Economics and Sociology Vol. 61 (July).
Mercuro, N. and S. Medema. 2006. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism and Beyond (2nd edition) (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Mumey, G. A. 1971. ‘Coase Theorem – Re-examination’ Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 85, No. 4.
Nutter, G. W. 1968. ‘Coase Theorem on Social Cost’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 11(October).
Pitchford, R. and C. M. Snyder. 2007. ‘Coming to the Nuisance: An Economic Analysis from an Incomplete Contracts Perspective’ Journal of Law Economics and Organization Vol. 19, No. 2.
Robson, S. 2008. ‘Costly Enforcement of Property Rights and the Coase Theorem’ Economic Theory Vol. 36, No. 1.
Rosenkranz, S. and P. W. Schmit. 2007. ‘Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?’ Economica Vol. 74. Samuels, W. J. 1974. ‘Coase Theorem and Study of Law and Economics’ Natural Resources Journal Vol. 14, No. 1.
Shapiro, D. L. 1974. ‘Note on Rent and Coase Theorem’ Journal of Economic Theory Vol. 7, No. 1.
Simon, H. and K. A. Ericsson 1980. ‘Verbal Reports as Data’ Psychological Review Vol. 87, No. 3.
Stigler, G. J. 1952 (1966). The Theory of Price (New York: The Macmillan Co.).
Stigler, G. J. 1971. ‘Theory of Economic Regulation’ Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science Vol. 2. No. 1.
Stigler, G. J. 1983. ‘Nobel Lecture’ Journal of Political Economy Vol. 91, No. 4.
Stigler, G. J. 1985. Memoirs of An Unregulated Economist (New York: Basic Books).
Stigler, G. J. 1989. ‘Two Notes on the Coase Theorem’ The Yale Law Journal Vol. 99, No. 3.
Stigler, G. J. and C. Friedland. 1975. ‘Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics’ Journal of Political Economy Vol. 83, No. 3.
Stigler, G. J. and G. Becker. 1974. ‘Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers’ 23 Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 3, No. 1.
Usher, D. 1998. ‘The Coase Theorem is Tautological, Incoherent, or Wrong’ Economic Letters Vol. 61.
Whitman, J. H. 2008. ‘Winning at all Costs: Using Law and Economics to Determine the Proper Role of Government in Regulating the Use of Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Professional Sports’ University of Illinois Law Review Vol. 1.
Wible, J. 1998. The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered (London: Routledge).
Williamson, O. 1979. ‘Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’ Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 22.
Yalcintas, A. 2009. Intellectual Paths and Pathologies: How Small Events in Scholarly Life Accidentally Grow Big (Rotterdam and Ankara: PhD Dissertation at Erasmus University Rotterdam).
Zerbe, R. O. 1980. ‘The Problem of Social Cost in Retrospect’ Research in Law and Economics Vol. 2.