Ghafele, Roya and Gibert, Benjamin (2012): Efficiency through openness: the economic value proposition of open source software.
Download (1MB) | Preview
This study identifies the mechanisms inherent to Open Source Software (OSS) production that help fuel innovation in knowledge-based economies. We furthermore assess the impact of Open Source Software on job and skill creation in the United States. We forecast that overall employment in software development occupations is to grow substantially. According to our estimates computer specialist occupations are expected to increase by over 22%, adding 762,000 jobs in the US from 2008 to 2018. This occupational group is one of the fastest growing – twice the average growth rate for all jobs - and software development occupations enjoy an average salary across all industries that is more than twice the national average for all occupations. We estimate that the number of OSS-related software development jobs in the US is estimated to be between 801,590 and 1,201,391 jobs in 2008. This will grow to between 910,007 and 1,477,794 by 2018 according to estimates based on employment projections by the US Bureau of Labour Statistics. The economic value proposition of OSS will reverberate well beyond the software industry. The broad diffusion of software development jobs throughout the US economy suggests that most sectors are in a strong position to adopt OSS. Information technology (IT) user sectors employ the majority of computer specialists in most software development occupations: 68% of computer systems analysts, 58% of computer programmers, 61% of computer and information scientists, and 48% of computer software engineers. This suggests that OSS adoption can be usefully implemented to cut costs and boost innovation efficiency in a variety of industries. As US industries are exposed to the benefits of OSS, open innovation processes outside software development may be adopted through a process of learning and imitation. This is likely to stimulate even greater innovation efficiency gains in all sectors of the US economy.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Efficiency through openness: the economic value proposition of open source software|
|Keywords:||Job creation, open source software, open innovation,|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
|Depositing User:||Roya Ghafele|
|Date Deposited:||13. Apr 2012 15:29|
|Last Modified:||20. May 2015 01:06|
Ajila, S. A, and D. Wu. 2007. “Empirical study of the effects of open source adoption on software development economics.” Journal of Systems and Software 80 (9): 1517–1529.
Allen, Robert, C. 1983. “Collective invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 4 (1) (March): 1-24. doi:doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9.
Almirall, E., and R. Casadesus-Masanell. 2010. “Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence.” The Academy of Management Review (AMR) 35 (1): 27–47.
Arora, A. 1995. “Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market for know-how.” Economics of innovation and new technology 4 (1): 41–60.
Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. 2001. “Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (2): 419.
Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. UMI.
Arrow, K. J. 1962. “The economic implications of learning by doing.” The review of economic studies 29 (3): 155–173.
Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events.” The economic journal 99 (394): 116–131.———. 1994. “Positive feedbacks in the economy.” McKinsey Quarterly: 81–81.———. 1996. “Increasing returns and the new world of business.” Harvard business review 74: 100–111.———. 2000. Myths and realities of the high-tech economy. In Talk given at Credit Suisse First Boston Though Leader Forum, Santa Fe Institute.
Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B. 2003. Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/ baldwinclark.pdf.
Behlendorf, B. 1999. Open source as a business strategy. C. Dibona, S. Ockman, M.Stone, eds. Open-sources: Voices from the open source revolution. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 149-170.
Benbya, Hind, and Bill McKelvey. 2006. “Toward a complexity theory of information systems development.” Information Technology & People 19 (1): 12-34. doi:10.1108/09593840610649952.
Bergstrom, T., L. Blume, and H. Varian. 1986. “On the private provision of public goods.” Journal of Public Economics 29 (1): 25-49.
Bitzer, Jorgen, Wolfram Schrettl, and Philipp J.H. Schroder. 2007. “Intrinsic motivation in open source software development.” Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (1) (March): 160-169. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.001.
Bonabeau E., Dorigo M. & Theraulaz G. 1999. Swarm intelligence, Oxford University Press.
Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cristina Rossi. 2003. “Why Open Source software can succeed.” Research Policy 32 (7) (July): 1243-1258. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00051-9.———. 2004. Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement. From community to business. Working paper Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa.
Boutellier, R., Gassmann, O., Macho, H. and Roux, M. 1998. Management of dispersed R&D teams. R&D Management, 28, 1, 13–25. BSA (Business Software Alliance). 2009. Software Industry Facts and Figures. Washington. BSA.
Callon, Michel, J Law, and A Rip. 1986. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology.
Campbell-Kelly, Martin, and Daniel D. Garcia-Swartz. 2009. “Pragmatism, not ideology: Historical perspectives on IBM’s adoption of open-source software.” Information Economics and Policy 21 (3) (August): 229-244. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.03.006.
Capra, Eugenio, Chiara Francalanci, Francesco Merlo, and
Cristina Rossi-Lamastra. 2011. “Firms’ involvement in Open Source projects: A trade-off between software structural quality and popularity.” Journal of Systems and Software 84 (1) (January): 144-161. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.004.
Chamberlin, J. 1974. “Provision of Collective Goods as a Function of Group Size.” The American Political Science Review 68 (2): 707-716.
Chandler, AD. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H. W, and M. M Appleyard. 2007. “Open innovation and strategy.” California Management Review 50 (1): 57.
Christensen, J.F., Olesen M, H. and Kjær J, S. 2005. The industrial dynamics of open innovation – evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34, 10, 1533–1549.
Coase, R. H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4 (16): 386-405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
Coase, Ronald H. 2007. The Problem of Social Cost. In Economic Analysis of the Law, 1-13. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752135.ch1.
Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.” Administrative science quarterly: 128–152.
Dahlander, L., M. G. Magnusson. 2005. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research Policy 34(4), 481-493.
David, P. A, and F. Rullani. 2008. “Dynamics of innovation in an ‘open source’ collaboration environment: lurking, laboring, and launching FLOSS projects on SourceForge.” Industrial and Corporate Change 17 (4): 647. Duesenberry, James. 1956. “Innovation and Growth.” The American Economic Review 46 (2) (May 1): 134-141.
Economides, N., and E. Katsamakas. 2006. “Linux vs. Windows: A comparison of application and platform innovation incentives for open source and proprietary software platforms.” The Economics of Open Source Software Development, Elsevier Publishers.
Enkel, E., O. Gassmann, and H. Chesbrough. 2009. “Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon.” R&D Management 39 (4): 311–316.
Feller, J., B. Fitzgerald. 2002. Understanding Open Source software development. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
Fitzgerald, B. 2006. “The transformation of open source software.” Mis Quarterly 30 (3): 587–598.
Fleming, L. 2001. "Recombinant uncertainty in technological search", Management Science, 47(1), pp. 117-132
Freeman, C. 1974. The Economic of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.
Gassmann, Oliver, Ellen Enkel, and Henry Chesbrough. 2010. “The future of open innovation.” R&D Management 40 (3) (June): 213-221. doi:Article.
Ghosh, Rishab Aiyer. 2006. ‘Economic Impact of Open Source Software on Innovation and Competitiveness of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Sector in EU’, prepared for the European Commission by UNU-MERIT and subcontractors.
Glass, R. L. 2004. “A look at the economics of open source.” Communications of the ACM 47 (2): 25–27.
Gould, D. M, and W. C Gruben. 1996. “The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth.” Journal of Development Economics 48 (2): 323–350.
Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 1990. “Trade, Innovation, and Growth.” The American Economic Review 80 (2) (May 1): 86-91.
Gulati, R. 1995. “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances.” The Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 85-112.
Harhoff, Dietmar, Joachim Henkel, and Eric von Hippel. 2003. “Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations.” Research Policy 32 (10) (December): 1753-1769. doi:doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00061-1.
Hars, A., and S. Ou. 2001. “Working for Free? – Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects.”
Hawkins, Richard E. 2004. “The economics of open source software for a competitive firm.” NETNOMICS 6 (2) (August 1): 103-117-117.
Hecker, F. 1999. Setting up shop: The business of open-source software. IEEE Software 16(1), 45-51.
Heller, M. A, and R. S Eisenberg. 1998. “Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research.” Science 280 (5364): 698.
Henkel, J. 2006. “Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux.” Research policy 35 (7): 953–969.
Hertel, G., S. Niedner, and S. Herrmann. 2003. “Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel.” Research policy 32 (7): 1159–1177.
Heylighen F. 1999. Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web, Computational and Mathematical Theory of Organizations 5(3), p. 253-280.
———. 2006. “Why is Open Access Development so Successful? Stigmergic organization and the economics of information.” Arxiv preprint cs/0612071.
Heylighen F. & C. Gershenson. 2003. The Meaning of Self-organization in Computing, IEEE Intelligent Systems 18:4, p. 72-75.
Von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Vol. 80. New York: Oxford University Press.———. 2007. “Horizontal innovation networks—by and for users.” Industrial and corporate change 16 (2): 293.
Von Hippel, E., and G. Von Krogh. 2003. “Open source software and the‘ private-collective’ innovation model: Issues for organization science.” Organization Science: 209–223.
Iannacci, F. 2002. “The economics of Open-source Networks.” Communications & Strategies 48 (4): 119–138. IDC .2006. ‘Open Source in Global Software: Market Impact, Disruption, and Business Models’. IDC.
Johnson, J. P. 1999. “Economics of open source software.” Unpublished working paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
de Jong, Jeroen P.J., Tarmo Kalvet, and Wim Vanhaverbeke. 2010. “Exploring a theoretical framework to structure the public policy implications of open innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (8) (November): 877-896. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.522771.
Katz, D., and R. L Kahn. 1978. “The social psychology of organizations.”
King, J.L., V. Gurbaxani, K.L. Kraemer, F.W. McFarlan, KS
Raman, and C.S. Yap. 1994. “Institutional factors in information technology innovation.” Information Systems Research 5 (2): 139–169.
Kogut, B., and A. Metiu. 2001. “Open-Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17 (2): 248.
Koschatzky, K. 2001. Networks in innovation research and innovation policy – an introduction. In: Koschatzky, K.,
Kulicke, M. and Zenker, A. (eds), Innovation Networks: Concepts and Challenges in the European Perspective. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag. Latour, B. 1996. “On actor-network theory.” Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–381.
Lazzarotti, V., and R. Manzini. 2009. “Different modes of open innovation: a theoretical framework and an empirical study.” International Journal of Innovation Management 13 (4): 615–636.
Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2004. The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
Lerner, Josh, and Jean Tirole. 2002. “Some Simple Economics of Open Source.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (2) (June 1): 197-234.
Lord, M.D., S.W. Mandel, and J.D. Wager. 2002. Spinning out a star. Harvard Business Review, (June): 115–21.
Lucas, R. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-39.
Lundvall, Bengt-äke, and Björn Johnson. 2011. “The Learning Economy.” Journal of Industry Studies 1 (2) (September 29): 23-42. doi:doi: 10.1080/13662719400000002.
MacCormack, A.D., J. Rusnak, C.Y. Baldwin, and Harvard Business School. Division of Research. 2004. Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Citeseer.
Maher, M. 1999. “Open Source software: the success of an alternative intellectual property incentive paradigm.” Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ 10: 619.
Martens B. 2004. The Cognitive Mechanics of Economic Development and Institutional Change, Routledge.
Merges, R. 1994. “Intellectual property rights and bargaining breakdown: The case of blocking patents.” Tennessee Law Review 62 (1): 74–106.
Millien, R., and R. Laurie. 2008. “Meet the middlemen.” Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) Magazine 28.
Monk, A. H. B. 2009. “The emerging market for intellectual property: drivers, restrainers, and implications.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4) (February): 469-491. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp003.
Narduzzo, A., Rossi, A. 2003. Modularity in Action: GNU/Linux and Free/Open Source Software Development Model Unleashed. http://opensource.mit.edu/ papers/narduzzorossi.pdf.
Nuvolari, A. 2004. “Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (3): 347.
Osterloh, Margit, and Sandra Rota. 2007. “Open source software development--Just another case of collective invention?” Research Policy 36 (2) (March): 157-171. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004.
O’Doherty, D. and K. Arnold. 2003. Understanding innovation: The need for a systemic approach. The IPTS Report 71. Seville: IPTS.
O’Reilly, T. 1999. “Lessons from Open-Source Software Development: Introduction.” Communications of the ACM 42 (4): 32–37.
Palfrey, T.R., and H. Rosenthal. 1984. “Participation and the Provision of Discrete Public Goods: A Strategic Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 24 (2): 171-193.
Pavitt, K. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.
Raymond, E. 1999. “The cathedral and the bazaar.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12 (3): 23–49.
Reilly, R. F, and R. P Schweihs. 2004. The handbook of business valuation and intellectual property analysis. McGraw-Hill.
Rogers, M. 1998. The definition and measurement of innovation. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar.bib?q=info:5oErPpbtQl8J:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&ct=citation&cd=24.
Romer, Paul M. 1986, “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), October, 1002-37.
Sacks, M. 1994. On-The-Job Learning in the Software Industry, Westport, CT: Quorum.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper, New York.
Shah, S. K. 2006. “Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development.” Management Science 52 (7): 1000.
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. 1999. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Singh, P. V, Y. Tan, and V. Mookerjee. 2008. “Network effects: The influence of structural social capital on open source project success.” SSRN eLibrary.
Solow, R.M. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (3): 312-320.
Spencer, Jennifer W. 2003. “Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry.” Strategic
Management Journal 24 (3): 217-233. doi:10.1002/smj.290. Stallman, R. 1999. 'The GNU Operating System and the Free Software Movement', in
C. DiBona, S. Ockman and M. Stone (eds), Open Sources. Voices from the Open Source Revolution (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, California), pp. 53-70.
Tidd, J. 1993. Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorga- nizational networks. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 307–322.
Torvalds, Linus and Diamond, David. 2001. Just for Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary, HarperBusiness.
Weber, Steven. 2000. The Political Economy of Open Source Software. June 1. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3hq916dc.
Wichmann, T. 2002. FLOSS final report – part 2: Free/Libre open source software: Survey and study – firms’ open source activities: Motivations and policy implications. Berlecon Research. http://www.berlecon.de/studien/downloads/ 200207FLOSS Activities.pdf.
Williamson, Oliver. 1979. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22 (2): 233-261.
Yu, Liguo. 2008. “Self-organization process in open-source software: An empirical study.” Information and Software Technology 50 (5) (April): 361-374. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.018.
Ziedonis, R. H. 2004. “Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms.” Management Science 50 (6): 804–820.