Vossler, Christian A. and McKee, Michael and Jones, Michael (2011): Some effects of tax information services reliability and availability on tax reporting behavior.
Download (62kB) | Preview
As an alternative to analyzing field data, our research utilizes controlled laboratory experiments with human decision makers and salient financial incentives. Within the laboratory, we determine (hence, know) the true tax liability, and then identify the effects of information services by systematically varying the setting across groups of players. In particular, our experimental design varies the degree of accessibility and accuracy of information services. Our design allows us to observe both the tax reporting behavior as well as the propensity of the taxpayer to obtain information by making information acquisition a (sometimes costly) choice.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Some effects of tax information services reliability and availability on tax reporting behavior|
|Keywords:||tax evasion; laboratory experiments|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion
|Depositing User:||Christian Vossler|
|Date Deposited:||18. May 2012 16:04|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 09:50|
Alm, James, Kim Bloomquist, and Michael McKee, 2011, “On the External Validity of Tax Compliance Experiments,” prepared for presentation at 2011 IRS Research Conference, Washington, DC.
Alm, James, Todd Cherry, Michael Jones, and Michael McKee, 2008. “Encouraging Filing via Tax Credits and Social Safety Nets,” The IRS Research Bulletin: Proceedings of the2008 IRS Research Conference, pp 43 – 57.
____________________________________________, 2010.“Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax Reporting Behavior.”Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (4): 577-586.
Alm, James, Betty R. Jackson, and Michael McKee. 1992a. “Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance with Experimental Data.” National Tax Journal 65 (1): 107-114.
__________________________________. 1992b. “Institutional Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance,” American Economic Review, 82 (4): 1018-1026.
Alm, James and Michael McKee. 2006. “Audit Certainty and Taxpayer Compliance.” National Tax Journal 59 (4): 801-816.
Cadsby, C. Bram, Elizabeth Maynes, and Viswanath Umashanker Trivedi. 2006. “Tax Compliance and Obedience to Authority at Home and in the Lab: A New Experimental Approach,” Experimental Economics, 9 (4): 343-359.
Feld, Lars and Bruno Frey. 2002. “Trust Breeds trust: How Taxpayers are Treated,” Economics of Governance, 3: 87-99.
Gravell, Jane, 2008, “Comments,” The IRS Research Bulletin: Proceedings of the 2008 IRS Research Conference, pp 59-60.
Greiner, Ben, 2004. “The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A Guide for the Organization of Experiments in Economics,” Working Paper Series in Economics 10, University of Cologne, Department of Economics.
Plott, Charles R. 1987. “Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods.” In Alvin E. Roth (ed.), Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Vernon. 1982. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” The American Economic Review 72 (5): 923-955.
Vossler, Christian, Michael McKee, Michael Jones, 2010, “The Impact of Taxpayer Information Services on Tax Reporting and Tax Filing,” presented at the 2010 meetings of the Southern Economics Association, Atlanta, GA.