Favaro, Donata and Ninka, Eniel and Turvani, Margherita (2012): Productivity in innovation: the role of inventor connections and mobility.
Download (144kB) | Preview
We study the transmission of knowledge arising from working relationships established by inventors, and its impact on firms’ innovation production. The study’s contribution to the literature is twofold. First, we consider those relationships that originate through inventor connections (”multi-applicant” inventors) and inventor mobility. Second, we analyse their effect on companies’ innovation production. The study focuses on the role played by geographical proximity, and the dynamic effects of knowledge flows. The geographical question is dealt with on a detailed level, by measuring knowledge spillovers observed within the same Local Labour System (LLS), between different LLSs of the region and, finally, with extra-regional LLSs. Dynamics are captured by measuring inventor mobility and connections occurring up to 20 years before patent filing. The analysis is carried out on the Italian region of Veneto and is based upon the original OECD REGPAT database of patent applications filed at the European Patent Office. The manual procedure we used to clean the data allows us to resolve some issues raised in the literature. Our results show that the impact of working relationships on innovation production depends on both geography and dynamics. Therefore, we can not conclude that productivity effects of knowledge flows occurring through the labour market are localized. However, we can conclude that working relationships have sizable productivity effects on innovation, either in the short or in the long run, depending on the geographical distance.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Productivity in innovation: the role of inventor connections and mobility|
|Keywords:||labour mobility; inventor connections; knowledge diffusion; innovation; geographical proximity;|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J61 - Geographic Labor Mobility ; Immigrant Workers
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights
|Depositing User:||Donata Favaro|
|Date Deposited:||23. May 2012 00:13|
|Last Modified:||16. Mar 2015 18:39|
Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., McHale, J. (2008) How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data, Journal of Urban Economics, 64: 258-269.
Almeida, P., Kogut, B. (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks, Management Science, 45: 905-917.
Boschma, R., Eriksson, R., Lindgreen, U. (2009) How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity, Journal of Economic Geography, 9: 169-190.
Boschma, R., Iammarino, S. (2009) Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy, Economic Geography, 85: 289-311.
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2005) “Cross-firm” inventors and social networks: localised knowledge spillovers revisited, Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 79/80: 189-209.
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows, Journal of Economic Geography, 9: 439-468.
Eriksson R.H. (2011) Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: how does proximity influence the performance of plants? Economic Geography, 87: 127-152.
Fischer, M.M., Scherngell, T., Jansenberger, E. (2006) The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe: evidence from a spatial interaction modelling perspective, Geographical Analysis, 38: 288-309.
Hendy, S.C., Sissons, C.M. (2011) Innovators, innovation and increasing returns to scale: Solving New Zealand’s productivity paradox, New Zealand Science Review, 68: 28-32.
Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., van Oort, F. (2009) The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe, Annals of Regional Science, 43: 721-738.
Jaffe A.B. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market share, American Economic Review, 76: 984–1001.
Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577-598.
Kim, J., Lee, S.J., Marschke, G. (2008) International knowledge flows: evidence from an inventor-firm matched data set. In Freeman, R.B., Goroff, D.L. (Eds) Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment, pp. 321-348. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laforgia, F., Lissoni, F. (2009) What do you mean by ‘Mobile’? Multi-applicant inventors in the European biotechnology. In Malerba F., Vonortas N.S. (Eds) Innovation Networks in Industries, pp. 157-176. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
LeSage, J.P., Fischer, M.F., Scherngell, T. (2007) Knowledge spillovers across Europe: evidence from a Poisson spatial interaction model with spatial effects, Papers in Regional Science, 86: 393-422.
Lundvall, B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Lychagin, S., Pinkse, J., Slade, M.S., Van Reenen, J. (2010) Spillovers in space: does geography matter? Discussion Paper 7928, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Maggioni, M.A., Uberti, T.E., Usai, S. (2011) Treating patents as relational data: knowledge transfers and spillovers across Italian provinces, Industry and Innovation, 18: 39-67.
Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., Guellec, D. (2008) The OECD REGPAT database: a presentation. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper 2008/2, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/241437144144.
Maurseth, B., Verspagen, B. (2002) Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citations analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104: 531-545.
Miguélez, E., Moreno, R., Suriñach, J. (2010) Inventors on the move: tracing inventors’ mobility and its spatial distribution, Papers in Regional Science, 89: 251-274.
Morgan, K. (1997) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, 31: 491-503.
Paci, R., Usai, S. (2009) Knowledge flows across European regions, Annals of Regional Science, 43: 669-690.
Power, D., Lundmark, M. (2004) Working through knowledge pools: labour market dynamics, the transference of knowledge and ideas, and industrial clusters, Urban Studies, 41: 1025-1044.
Raffo, J., Lhuillery, S. (2007) How to play the ‘Names Game’: patent retrieval comparing different heuristics, Research Policy, 38: 1617-1627.
Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2001) Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and Empirical evidence, Papers in Regional Science, 80: 275-295.
Rodriguez-Pose, A., Crescenzi, R. (2008) Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe, Regional Studies, 42: 51-67.
Romer, P.M. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002-1037.
Romer, P.M. (1990) Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98: 71-102.
Simonen, J., McCann, P. (2008) Firm innovation: the influence of R&D cooperation and the geography of human capital inputs, Journal of Urban Economics, 64: 146-154.
Simonen, J., McCann, P. (2010) Knowledge transfers and innovation: the role of labour markets and R&D co-operation between agents and institutions, Papers in Regional Science, 89: 295-309.
Trajtenberg, M., Shiff, G., Melamed, R. (2006) The “names game”: harnessing inventors’ patent data for economic research. Working Paper 12479, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Verspagen, B., Schoenmakers, P.L. (2004) The spatial dimension of patenting by multinational firms in Europe, Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 23-42.
Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Armstrong, J. (1998) Geographically localised knowledge: spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36: 65-86.