Hasan, Dr. Syed Akif and Subhani, Dr. Muhammad Imtiaz and Osman, Ms. Amber (2012): H-Index: The key to research output assessment. Published in: Archives Des Sciences , Vol. 65, No. 4 (2012)
Download (106Kb) | Preview
The capacity of research has increased enormously with number of working and published research papers, research journals, research repositories, indexing and abstracting agencies and research scholars/authors proffering varied knowledge. Every field has its own way of monitoring and evaluation and similarly so does the research field. There are multiple ways of assessing the research journals, published papers and authors in order to classify research output time to time and also to acknowledge and recognize the new knowledge and information creation by the authors. Narrowing our research domain to research ranking then just few years ago, H-Index has developed its importance and use to justify the authors profile, research papers and journals in evaluating the research quality of an author or may it be a Research Journal or even universities. This paper describes the H-Index default purpose, accuracy, assessment of how it assesses the research work of author/ journals/ Universities and for which of them it matters much. The findings revealed very frankly that h-index is comparatively a better method to rank researchers only, while, interesting to foretell if any other competing ranking method is more better or a new invention it’s on it way. Let’s dig in more to have a brighter enlightenment than H-Index.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||H-Index: The key to research output assessment|
|English Title:||H-Index: The key to research output assessment|
|Keywords:||H-index, research rankings, authors, journals, universities|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions|
|Depositing User:||Muhammad Imtiaz Subhani|
|Date Deposited:||29. May 2012 14:13|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 15:21|
Abbas, A. M. (2010).Weighted Indices for Evaluating the Quality of Research with Multiple Authorship. Scientometrics, 88(1): 107-131.
Bletsas, A., & Sahalos, J. N. (2009). Hirsch Index Rankings Require Scaling and Higher Moment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12): 2577–2586.
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R.,& Daniel, H. D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830–837.
Bouyssou, D., & Marchant., T. (2011). Bibliometric rankings of journals based on impact factors: An axiomatic approach. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1):75-86.
Cronin, B. & Meho, L. I. (2006). Using the H-index to Rank Influential Information Scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9): 1275-1278.
Guerin, M. T. (2010). Ranking the Scholarly Impact of New Jersey Colleges and Universities in the Field Of Psychology. TCNJ Journal of Student Scholarship, 12: 1-11.
Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? PNAS, 104(49): 19193–19198.
Jacso, P. (2011). The h-index, h-core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database. Online Information Review, 35(3): 492-501.
Jacso, P. (2008). The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases. Online Information Review, 32(2): 266-283.
Mingers, J. (2009). Measuring the research contribution of management academics using the Hirsch-index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(9):1143 –1153.
Norris, M. & Oppenheim, C. (2010). The h-index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. Journal of Documentation, 66(5): 681-705.
Subhani, M. I., Hasan, S. A., & Osman, A. (2011). Research methodologies for management sciences & interdisciplinary research in contemporary world. European Journal of Scientific Research, 63(4), 543–547.