Sen, Subir Kumar and Roy, Chinmoy (2011): Competitive Selection In Non-Competitive Structure– Some Methodological Issues. Published in: International Journal of Business Policy and Economics , Vol. 4, No. 2 (December 2011): pp. 193-200.
Download (439Kb) | Preview
The principal aim of this paper is to select a contractor who offers the best value for money. This will nearly always involve a process of competitive tendering. The final decision as to which contractor offers the best value for money will be determined by the factors like quality/price mechanism based on a numerical scoring and weighting system. However, in a political-emotional state of nature, this type of numerical scoring and weighting system, sometimes, faces the question of lack of transparency on the one hand and potential loss of resources of the authority on the other hand. This type of situation could have been resolved if the authority apply the reverse Delphi method. The advantage of this method is manifold- maintains transparency in the selection process; authority can achieved the least cost economic efficiency and, thereby, saves resources by utilising the competitive environment among the shortlisted contractors.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Competitive Selection In Non-Competitive Structure– Some Methodological Issues|
|Keywords:||Competitive Bidding, Lowest Bid, Reverse Delphi Method, Public Sector Organisations|
|Subjects:||K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law
L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction
|Depositing User:||Subir Kumar Sen|
|Date Deposited:||30. May 2012 11:11|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 16:30|
Alsugair, A. (1999), ‘‘Framework for Evaluating Bids of Construction Contractors,’’ Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 15(2), pp. 72-78.
Ayman, H. (2000), “Examining Service Quality within Construction Processes”, Technovation, Vol. 20, Issue 11, pp. 643-651.
Gary, D. Holt et al (1994), “Applying Multi-attribute Analysis to Contractor Selection Decisions”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp. 139-148
Hatush, Z. et al (1998), “Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Utility Theory: An Additive Model”, Building and Environment, Vol. 33, Issues 2-3, pp. 105-115.
Holt, C. A. (1980), “Competitive Bidding for Contracts Under Alternative Auction Procedures,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, pp. 433-45.
James E. Diekmann (1981), “Cost-Plus Contractor Selection: A Case Study”, Journal of the Technical Councils of ASCE, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 13-25.
Plessner, Y. (1971), “Computing Equilibrium Solutions for Imperfectly Competitive Markets”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 53, No. 2 pp. 191-196.
Singh, D. (2006), “Contractor Selection Criteria: Investigation of Opinions of Singapore Construction Practitioners”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 9, pp. 998-1008.
Topku, Y. (2004), “A Decision Model Proposal for onstruction Contractor Selection in Turkey”, Building and Environment, Vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 469-481.
Weverbergh, M. (1979), “Competitive Bidding with Asymmetric Information Reanalyzed”, Management Science, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 291-294.
Wilson, B. (1967), “Competitive Bidding with Asymmetric Information”, Management Science, Vol. 13, No. 11, Series A, pp. 816-820.