Sen, S K and Guha, S and Chakraborty, N (2011): A Study on Regional Disparity of Devolution of Rural Infrastructure Development Fund - Evidence for India.
Download (910kB) | Preview
The present paper attempts to examine the normative criteria of RIDF devolution by NABARD in reducing inter and intra state disparity in terms of sanction of per capita RIDF over the study period 1996 to 2010. Following Spiezia (2002), Adjusted Geographic Concentration index has been used to test the nature and sources of concentration of per capita sanction of RIDF. The empirical findings support a relatively high degree of concentrations in devolution of such fund among the states. The study also identifies the sources of such concentration. The underlying reasons behind such inter and intra state disparity in per capita sanction of RIDF is mainly the matching grant scheme applied to all the states and the twenty percentages reward formula under such devolution criteria. This study strongly recommended the review of the normative criteria for devolution of RIDF set by the NABARD by removing the matching grant scheme and restricting the twenty percentage reward formula, for the less developed states including the states in the north eastern region only for achieving the goal of balanced regional development of rural infrastructure.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A Study on Regional Disparity of Devolution of Rural Infrastructure Development Fund - Evidence for India|
|Keywords:||Rural Infrastructure, Regional Disparity, Geographic Concentration, Matching Grant Scheme, Reward Formula|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy
G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
|Depositing User:||Subir Kumar Sen|
|Date Deposited:||30. May 2012 11:11|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 15:17|
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 106 (2), 407-443.
Binswanger, H. P., Khandker, S. R., & Rosenzweig, M. R. 1993). How Infrastructure and Financial Institutions Affect Agricultural Output and Investment in India. Journal Of Development Economics , 41, 337-366.
Ellison, G., and E. L. Glaeser. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy , 105, 889-927.
Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Haque, T. (2000). Targeting public investments by agro-ecological zone to achieve growth and poverty alleviation goals in rural India. Food Policy , 25 (4), 411-428.
Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Thorat, S. (2000). Government spending, growth and poverty in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 82 (4), 1038-1051.
Government of India. (1995). Budget Speech of the Union Finance Minister. Ministry of Finance. New Delhi: Government of India.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jha, R. (2002). Rural Poverty in India: Structure, determinants and suggestions for policy reform. Australia South Asia Research Centre: ASARC Working Papers 2002-07, Australian National University.
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lewis, A. W. (1955). The Theory of Economic Growth. London: Allen Unwin.
Mellor, J. W. (1976). The New Economics of Growth: A Strategy for India and the Developing World. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
NABARD. (2009). Annual Reports. Mumbai: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
NABARD. (2010). Infrastructure for Agriculture and Rural Development-An Impact Assessment of Investments in Rural Roads and Bridges under RIDF. Mumbai: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
Planning Commission. (2007). Eleventh Five Year Plan. New Delhi: Government of India.
Rajeev, M. (2008). A Critical Analysis of RIDF. Economic and Political Weekly , XLIII (7), 27-31.
Spiezia, V. (2002). Geographic Concentration of Production and Unemployment in OECD countries. International Statistical Institute Journal , December 2002.
Wharton, C. (1967). The Infraestructure for Agricultural Growth. New York: Southworth and Johnston.
World Bank. (1994). World Development Report: Infrastructure for Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (1997). World Development Report: Rural Development: Vision to Action: A Sector Strategy. Washington DC: Oxford University Press.