Aristovnik, Aleksander (2012): Fiscal decentralization in Eastern Europe: a twenty-year perspective.
Download (371Kb) | Preview
The paper attempts to provide an overview of the fiscal decentralization process in emerging market economies in Eastern Europe in the last 20 years. Using methodology developed by Vo (2009), the paper assesses the degree of fiscal decentralization in the region. Conceptually, the measurement of fiscal decentralization focuses on fiscal autonomy and the fiscal importance of subnational governments. The empirical analysis reveals that according to our definition of fiscal decentralization the highest level of (average) fiscal decentralization (centralization) is found in Russia (Armenia) among non-EU members and in Estonia (Slovak Republic) among EU members of the Eastern European. In addition, the empirical results show that, in general, the degree of fiscal decentralization is higher in developed OECD countries than in most Eastern European countries (EECs). However, in contrast to our expectations, there has been an alarming downward trend of FDI in most of the region over the last two decades. Moreover, the paper also examines the effects of fiscal decentralization on growth and public sector size in EECs. The analysis provides some evidence that increases in public sector decentralization are associated with higher income levels. However, the growth-enhancing effects of fiscal decentralization are expected to be much greater when supported by a sound institutional environment. Therefore, EECs, in particular non-EU member states, should improve their administrative and technical capability in order to establish sound and effective fiscal decentralization. Finally, our results suggest that fiscal decentralization in EECs generally leads to an increase in the size of government, albeit there are some significant differences between EU and non-EU member states.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Fiscal decentralization in Eastern Europe: a twenty-year perspective|
|Keywords:||fiscal decentralization; fiscal autonomy; fiscal importance; Eastern European countries; economic growth; public sector size|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods
H - Public Economics > H0 - General
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
|Depositing User:||Aleksander Aristovnik|
|Date Deposited:||08. Jun 2012 01:29|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 22:21|
Adugna, A., and Fitz Ford, J. 2010. Intergovernmental Fiscal Systems and Development Aid: Some Comparisons and Lessons of Experience, CFP Working Paper Series No. 6.
Alesina, A., and Spolaore, E. 1997. On the number and size of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4): 1027–1056.
Arzaghi, M., and Vernon H., J. 2005. Why countries are fiscally decentralizing? Journal of Public Economics, 89(7): 1157–89.
Ashworth, J., Galli, E., and Padovano, F. 2008. Decentralization as a constraint to Leviathan: a panel cointegration analysis. Mimeo.
Baskaran, T. 2010. On the link between fiscal decentralization and public debt in OECD countries. Public Choice, 145(3): 351–378.
Baskaran, T. 2011. Fiscal decentralization, ideology, and the size of the public sector. European Journal of Political Economy, 27: 485–506.
Baskaran, T., and Feld, L., P. 2009. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is there a Relationship? CESIFO Working Paper No 2721.
Bodman, P., and Ford, K. 2006. Fiscal Federalism and Economic Growth in the OECD, MRG@UQ discussion paper no.7, School of Economics, University of Queensland.
Buser, W. 2011. The impact of fiscal decentralization on economics performance in high-income OECD nations: An institutional approach. Public Choice, 149: 31–48.
Cassette , A., and Paty , S. 2010. Fiscal decentralization and the size of government: A European country empirical analysis. Public Choice, 143: 173–189.
Dabla-Norris, E. 2006. The challenge of fiscal decentralization in transition countries. Comparative Economic Studies 48: 100–131.
Davoodi, H., and H.F. Zou. 1998. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43: 244–257.
Ebel, R., and Yilmaz, S. 2002. On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809, World Bank: Washington DC.
Edhaie, J. 1994. Fiscal decentralization and the size of government, an extension with evidence from crosscountry data. Policy Research Working Paper No. 1387, World Bank.
Eller, M. 2004. The determinants of fiscal decentralization and its determinants on economic growth: empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries (Diploma thesis).
Enikolopov, R., and Zhuravskaya, E. 2007. Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11–12): 2261–2290.
Feld, L. P., and Dede, T. 2004. Fiscal federalism and economic growth: Cross country evidence for OECD countries (Unpublished manuscript). Philipps-University Marburg.
Feld, L., P., Kirchgassnner, G., and Schaltegger, C., A. 2003. Decentralized taxation and the size of government: Evidence from Swiss States and local governments, CESifo Working Paper 1087.
Heil, J., B. 1991. The search for Leviathan revisited. Public Finance Quarterly 19: 334–346.
Iimi, A. 2005. Decentralization and economic growth revisited: An empirical note. The Journal of Urban Economics, 57: 449–461.
Jin, J., and Zou, H. 2002. How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national, and subnational government size? Journal of Urban Economics, 52: 270–293.
Klugman, J. 1994. Decentralisation: A survey of literature from a human development perspective. United Nations Development Programme Occasional Paper 13, Human Development Report Office.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., and McNab, R. 2003: Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31: 1597–1616.
McCullough, J., Spofford, T., Savov, E., and Ivanov, S. 2000. Bulgaria: Comprehensive municipal finance and fiscal reform proposal. Sofia: USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development), The Urban Institute.
Musgrave, R., A. 1959. The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oates, W. E. 1993. Fiscal decentralization and economic development. National Tax Journal, 46(2): 237–243.
Oates, W., E. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Panizza, U. 1999. On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74(1): 97–139.
Piriou-Sall, S. 1998. Decentralization and rural development: A review of evidence. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Prud’homme, R. 1995. The dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2): 201–220.
Rodden, J. 2004. Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4): 481–500.
Rodden, J., 2003. Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization, 57: 695–729.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Gill, N. 2005. On the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution. Regional Studies, 39(4): 405–420.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Krøijer, A. 2009. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change, 40(3): 387–417.
Smoke, P. 2001. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Concepts and Practice, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
Stein, E. 1998. Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. Working paper, Office of the Chief Economist, Inter-American Development Bank.
Stein, E. 1999. Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. Journal of Applied Economics, 2(2): 357–391.
Thießen, U. 2000. Fiscal federalism in western European and selected other countries: Centralization or decentralization? What is better for economic growth? (Unpublished manuscript). DIW Berlin.
Thießen, U. 2003. Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high income OECD countries. Fiscal Studies, 24(3): 273–274.
Thorton, J. 2007. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(1): 64–70.
Tiebout, C. M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416–424.
UNDP. 2005. Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Economies: Case Studies from the Balkans and Caucasus. Bratislava Regional Centre.
UNDP. 2008. Decentralization in the Europe and CIS region. Discussion Paper, April 2008, Democratic Governance Practice, Bratislava Regional Centre.
Vo, D. H. 2005. Fiscal Decentralisation in Vietnam: A Preliminary Investigation. Economics Discussion / Working Papers 05–16, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
Vo, D., H. 2009. Fiscal decentralisation in Vietnam: Lessons from selected Asian nations. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 14(4): 399–419.
World Bank. 2000. Overview of Decentralisation in Indi (Vol. I). Washington: World Bank.
Yilmaz, S. 1999. The impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic performance, National Tax Association, Proceedings of the 92nd annual conference on taxation, 24–26 October 1999, Atlanta, 251–260.
Zhang, T., and Zou, H. 2001. The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure: With applications to China and India. China Economic Review 2(1): 58–81.
Available Versions of this Item
- Fiscal decentralization in Eastern Europe: a twenty-year perspective. (deposited 08. Jun 2012 01:29) [Currently Displayed]