Aristovnik, Aleksander (2012): The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: a non-parametric analysis. Published in: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , Vol. 3, No. 11 (1. July 2012): pp. 144-152.
Download (231Kb) | Preview
The purpose of the paper is to review some previous researches examining ICT efficiency and the impact of ICT on educational output/outcome as well as different conceptual and methodological issues related to performance measurement. Moreover, a definition, measurements and the empirical application of a model measuring the efficiency of ICT use and its impact at national levels will be considered. For this purpose, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique is presented and then applied to selected EU-27 and OECD countries. The empirical results show that the efficiency of ICT, when taking educational outputs/outcomes into consideration, differs significantly across the great majority of EU and OECD countries. The analysis of the varying levels of (output-oriented) efficiency (under the VRSTE framework) shows that Finland, Norway, Belgium and Korea are the most efficient countries in terms of their ICT sectors. Finally, the analysis finds evidence that most of the countries under consideration hold great potential for increased efficiency in ICT and for improving their educational outputs and outcomes.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: a non-parametric analysis|
|Keywords:||Information and Communication Technology (ICT), education, performance, efficiency, DEA, EU, OECD|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions
L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights
|Depositing User:||Aleksander Aristovnik|
|Date Deposited:||03. Jul 2012 13:05|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 01:20|
Afonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2005). Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in Oecd countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2): 227-246.
Afonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2006a). Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: a semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs. Economic Modelling, 23(3): 476-491.
Afonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2006b). Relative efficiency of health provision: a DEA approach with non-discretionary inputs. ISEG-UTL, Department of Economics Working Paper nº 33/2006/DE/UECE.
Amjad, R. 2006. Why Pakistan must break-into the knowledge economy. Lahore Journal of Economics, Special Edition, September 2006.
Bailey, S. J. (2002). Public Sector Economics: Theory, Policy and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: a review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet.
Becta. (2006). The Becta Review 2006: Evidence on the progress of ICT in education’, UK: Becta. Retrieved March 01, 2012 from http://becta.org.uk/corporate/publications/documents/The_Becta_Review_2006.pdf
Chalos, P. (1997). An examination of budgetary inefficiency in education using data envelopment analysis. Financial Accountability & Management, 13(1): 55–69.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 33: 429-444.
Clements, B. (2002). How efficient is education spending in Europe? European Review of Economics and Finance, 1: 3-26.
Coelli T., Rao, D., & Battese, G. (2002). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. 6th edition, Massachusetts, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cox, M., J., & Marshall, G. M. (2007). Effects of ICT: do we know what we should know?’, Education and Information Technologies, 12: 59–70.
Empirica. (2006). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006. Bonn: Empirica. Retrieved February 02, 2012 from http://www.empirica.com/publikationen/documents/No08-2006_learnInd.pdf
Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and stu¬dent learning: bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school, CESifo Working Paper. No. 1321. No¬vember. Munich.
Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2002). The impact of internet subsidies in public schools, NBER Working Papers 9090, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Gülbahar, Y., (2008). ICT usage in higher education: a case study on preservice teachers and instructors, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1): 32-37.
Gupta, S., & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The efficiency of government expenditure: experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modelling, 23: 433-467.
Hameed, T. (2006). ICT as an enabler for socio-economic development. Digital Opportunity Forum 2006, International Telecommunication Union, Seoul: Korea. Retrieved January 26, 2012, from http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/digitalbridges/materials/hameed-paper.pdf
Iqbal, M. J., & Ahmed, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of education through e-learning: the case study of Allama Iqbal Open University. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(1). Retrieved January 16, 2012 from https://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde37/articles/article_5.htm
Jafarov, E., & Gunnarsson, V. (2008). Government spending on health care and education in Croatia: efficiency and reform options; International Monetary Fund; IMF Working Paper; WP/08/136.
Jayson, W. R. (2008). ICT in education reform in Cambodia: problems, politics, and policies impacting implementation. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(4): 67–82.
Johnes, J. (1996). Performance assessment in higher education in Britain. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 89, 18-33.
Kang, M., Heo, H., Jo, I, Shin, J., Seo, J., & Shin, S. (2008). The new millennium learners and educational performance: the 2nd year report. Technical report. KERIS
Khan, A. M., & Shah, Q. A. (2004). Study on impact of information and communication technology on decent work in Pakistan. Islamabad: Pakistan Manpower Institute, Ministry of Labour Manpower & Overseas Pakistanis, Government of Pakistan.
Kirpatrick, H., & L. Cuban. (1998). Computers make kids smarter--right? Technos Quarterly for Education and Technology, 7, 2.
Kozma, R. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: an international study, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1): 1–14.
Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. Center for Technology in Learning, SRI International (to appear in the International Handbook on Information Technology in Education).
Kulik, J. (2003). The effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: what controlled evaluation studies say. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2004). The effect of extra funding for disadvan¬taged pupils on achievement. IZA Discussion Paper. No. 1122. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
Machin, S., McNally, S., & Silva, O. (2006). New technologies in schools: is there a pay off? London: Centre for Economic Performance; Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labour.
Mandl, U., Dierx A., & Ilzkovitz, F. (2008). The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending. European Commission, Economic Papers 31, February.
Markovic, R. M. (2009). Education through E-learning: Case of Serbia . Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(4), 313-319.
OECD. (2010). Education at glance 2010. OECD indicators. Retrieved February 21, 2012 from http://www.oecd.org/document/52/0,3343,en_2649_39263238_45897844_1_1_1_1,00.html
Ozcan, Y. A. (2007). Health Care Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation: An Assessment using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). New York: Springer.
Pelgrum, W.J., & Anderson, R.A. (Eds) (1999). ICT and the merging paradigm for life-long learning: A worldwide assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Shaheeda, J., Dick, N., & Laura, C. (2007). The role of ICTs in higher education in South Africa: One strategy for addressing teaching and learning challenges. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 3(4): 131-142.
Shaikh, Z. A. (2009). Usage, acceptance, adoption, and diffusion of information and communication technologies in higher education: a measurement of critical factors. Journal of Information Technology Impact (JITI), 9(2): 63-80.
Shaikh, Z., A., & Khoja, S. A. (2011). Role of ICT in shaping the future of Pakistani higher education system. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1): 149-161.
St. Aubyn, M. (2003). Evaluating efficiency in the Portuguese education sector. Economia, 26, 25-51.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 197-206.
Trucano, M. (2005). Knowledge maps: ICT in education, Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank.
Unesco. (2011). Data centre, Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, On-line.
Verma, A., & Gavirneni, S. (2006). Measuring police efficiency in India: an application of data envelopment analysis. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29(1): 125-145.
World Bank. (2011). World development indicators, On-line.
Youssef, B., A., & Dahmani, M. (2008). Student's performances and ICTs, University and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), March 2008, 45-56.
Yusuf, M. O., & Afolabi, A. O. (2010). Effects of computer assisted instruction (cai) on secondary school students’ performance in biology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1): 62-69.