Arkes, Hal and Hirshleifer, David and Jiang, Danling and Lim, Sonya (2007): Prospect Theory and Reference Point Adaptation: Evidence from the US, China, and Korea.
We examined prospect theory and reference point adaptation following gains or losses using participants from China, Korea, and the US. Supporting prospect theory, we found in Studies 1 and 2 that subjects from all three countries generally exhibited loss aversion and a greater propensity for risk seeking in the loss domain than in the gain domain. In Study 3 we used the Becker, DeGroot, and Marschak (1964) procedure to ascertain the valuation subjects placed on a gamble after either a prior gain or a prior loss on a stock. After inferring the shift in each subject’s reference point following this prior gain or loss, we found that reference point adaptation following a gain exceeded that following a loss in all three countries. In our third study we also had subjects sell and then immediately repurchase a stock that had experienced a prior gain or loss, which was designed to “punctuate” or close the mental account containing the prior gain or loss. This manipulation caused an increase in reference point adaptation among the Americans but a decrease among the Asians.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Prospect Theory and Reference Point Adaptation: Evidence from the US, China, and Korea|
|Keywords:||prospect theory; cross-cultural differences; reference point adaptation; mental accounting|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
|Depositing User:||Danling Jiang|
|Date Deposited:||24. Jul 2007|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 09:43|
Arkes, H. R., D. A. Hirshleifer, D. Jiang, S. S. Lim, 2007. Reference Point Adaptation: Tests in the Domain of Security Trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, forthcoming. Barberis, N., M. Huang. 2001. Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. Journal of Finance 56 1247-1292. Barberis, N., M. Huang, T. Santos. 2001. Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 1-53. Becker, G. M., M. H. DeGroot, J. Marschak, J. 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 9 226-232. Bernartzi, S., R. H. Thaler. 1995. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 73-92. Brislin, R. 1986. The wording and translation of research instruments. W. J. Lonner and J. W. Berry, eds. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research Methodology Series. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 8, 137-164. Daniel, K. D., S. Titman, J. Wei. 2001. Cross-Sectional Variation in Common Stock Returns in Japan. Journal of Finance 56 743-766. Dimson E., P. Marsh, M. Staunton. 2006. Worldwide Equity Premium: A Smaller Puzzle. In R. Mehra (Ed.), Handbook of Investments: Equity Risk Premium (pp. xxx-xxx). North-Holland. Fama, E.F., K.R. French. 1998. Value versus Growth: The International Evidence. Journal of Finance 53 1975-1999. Feng, L., M. S. Seasholes. 2005. Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets? Review of Finance 9 305–351. Feuer, E. J., L. G. Kessler. 1989. Test statistic and sample size for a two-sample McNemar test. Biometrics 45 629-636. Grinblatt, M., M. Keloharju. 2001. What makes investors trade? Journal of Finance 56 589-616. Heath, C., R. P. Larrick, G. Wu. 1999. Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology 38 79-109. Hsee, C. K., E. U. Weber. 1999. Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 165-179. Ji, L-J., R.E. Nisbett, Y. Su. 2001. Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science 12 450-456. Kachelmeier, S. J., and M. Shehata. 1992. Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82, 1120-1141. Kahneman, D., D. Lovallo. 1993. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science 39 17-31. Kahneman, D., A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 263–292. Levinson, J. D., K. Peng. 2006. Valuing cultural differences in behavioral economics. The ICFAI Journal of Behavioral Finance 1 32-47. Odean, T. 1998. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance 53 1775-1798. Shefrin, H., M. Statman. 1985. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 40 777-790. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 16 27-44. Strahilevitz, M. A. and M. Loewenstein. 1998, The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research 25 276-289. Thaler, R. H. 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science 4 199–214. Thaler, R. H. 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 183–206. Tversky, A., D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 297–323. Weber, E. U., C. K. Hsee, C. K., J. Sokolowska. 1998. What folklore tells us about risk and risk taking: Cross-cultural comparisons of American, German, and Chinese proverbs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 170-186. Weber, E. U., C. K. Hsee. 1998. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards risk. Management Science 44 1205-1217. Weber, E. U., C. K. Hsee. 2000. Culture and individual judgment and decision-making. Applied Psychology: An International Review 49 32-61. Wright, G. N., L. D. Phillips. 1980. Cultural variation in probabilistic thinking: Alternative ways of dealing with uncertainty. International Journal of Psychology 15 239-257. Yates, J. F., Y. Zhu, D. L. Ronis, D,-F. Wang, H. Shinotsuka, M. Toda. 1989. Probability judgment accuracy: China, Japan, and the United States. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 145-171.
Available Versions of this Item
- Prospect Theory and Reference Point Adaptation: Evidence from the US, China, and Korea. (deposited 24. Jul 2007) [Currently Displayed]