de santis, roberta (2012): Trade, FDI, growth and biodiversity: an empirical analysis for the main OECD countries.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (417kB) | Preview
Whether the Environmental Kutznets curve relationship holds for biodiversity or not remains an open issue. While there are several studies investigating the EKC relationship for biodiversity, they suffer from some limitations and the empirical evidence is inconclusive. More specifically, with few exceptions, the previous EKC studies for biodiversity looked into the diversity of a particular species or a number of species rather than a broader measure of biodiversity. In addition, these studies do not control for some economic factors that could directly or indirectly affect the biodiversity stock such as trade and foreign direct investments (FDI). International trade, in fact, could influence the biodiversity trough the effects on economic growth, production specialization and technological innovation diffusion. The presence or not of FDI in a country could be of help in assessing the “pollution haven” hypothesis that has obvious feedbacks on biodiversity.
The innovative features of this paper are its attempts to estimate a ECK for biodiversity using an overall index of biodiversity terrestrial and marine and the inclusion in the traditional ECK equation of proxies for trade and FDI. According to our estimates for the main OECD countries in the period 1990-2010, the ECK hypothesis is partially verified. Rising incomes are first associated with increasing biodiversity then with decreasing biodiversity and eventually with increasing biodiversity again. This non-monotonic relationship could be explained by the fact that a certain level of income (production) there may be some biodiversity losses that cannot be continuously substituted with environmental-friendly production technology due to ecological threshold and the unique nature of the damage.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Trade, FDI, growth and biodiversity: an empirical analysis for the main OECD countries.|
|Keywords:||Biodiversity risk, Trade, FDI, Environmental Kuznets curve|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment
|Depositing User:||roberta de santis|
|Date Deposited:||18. Jul 2012 10:23|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 17:02|
Andreoni, J. and A. Levinson (2001), ‘The Simple Analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 269-286.
Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2003) ‘Biodiversity Loss and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis’. Contemporary Economic Policy 21:173-185.
Dasgupta, P. (2000), ‘Valuing Biodiversity, Encyclopedia of Biodiversity’, edited by Simon Levin, New York: Academic Press.
Dasgupta, S., B. Laplante, H. Wang, and D. Wheeler (2002), ‘Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 147- 168.
De Santis R. (in press), ‘Impact of environmental regulations on trade in the main EU countries: conflict or synergy?’, The World Economy,
Dietz, S. and W. N. Adger (2001), ‘Economic Growth, Biodiversity Loss and Conservation Effort’, CSERGE Working Paper No. ECM 01-03, University of East Anglia, Norwitch.
Grossman, G and B. Krueger, (1996) ‘The Inverted-U: What Does IT Mean?’, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 119-122.
Harbaugh, B., A. Levinson and D. Wilson, (2002) ‘Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 541-551.
Jie He (2007), ‘Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis valid for developing countries? A survey’ , Gredi WP, 07-03.
Kuznets, S. (1955), ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No.1, pp. 1-28.
Mozumder, P., R. P. Berrens, and A. K. Bohara. (2006). ‘Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curvefor the Risk of Biodiversity Loss?’ The Journal of Developing Areas, 39: pp.175-190.
McPherson, M. and M. L. Nieswiadomy (2000), ‘Environmental Kuznets Curve Study of Threatened Species’, Paper Presented at 75th Annual Conference of the Western Economic Association International, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Naidoo, R. and W. L. Adamowicz (2001), ‘Effects on Economic Prosperity on Numbers of Threatened Species’, Conservation Biology, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 1021-1029.
Omer, A., U. Pascual and N. Russell (2003), ‘Agricultural Intensification and Biodiversity Loss: Is There and Agri-EKC?’, The School of Economics Discussion Paper No. 0317, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Panayotou, T. (1993) ‘Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development’, World Employment Program Research Working Paper WEP2- 22/WP 238
D. Rothman and N. Khanna (2008), ‘Macro- and Micro-Perspectives on Economic Development and Biodiversity’, Binghamton University Economics Department Working Paper 0801.
Ryers, B. and A. N. James (1999), ‘An Upgraded National Biodiversity Risk Assessment Index’, Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 8, No. 11, pp.1555-1560.
Ryers, B., A. S. Van Jaarsveld, M.A. McGeoch, A. N. James (1998), ‘National Biodiversity Risk Assessment: A Composite Multivariate and Index Approach’, Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 945-965.
Rock, M. (1996), ‘Pollution Intensity of GDP and Trade Policy: Can the World bank be Wrong?’, World Development, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 471-47
Stern, D. I. (1998), ‘Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.175-198.
Stern, D. I. And M. S. Common (2001), ‘Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp.162-178.
Suri, V. and D. Chapman (1998) ‘Economic growth, trade and the energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve’, Ecological Economics 25, pp. 195 -208.
Available Versions of this Item
Trade, FDI, growth and biodiversity: an empirical analysis for the main OECD countries. (deposited 29. Mar 2012 13:49)
- Trade, FDI, growth and biodiversity: an empirical analysis for the main OECD countries. (deposited 18. Jul 2012 10:23) [Currently Displayed]