העוני וההתנהגות בשוק העבודה בחברה החרדית

Gottlieb, Daniel (2007): העוני וההתנהגות בשוק העבודה בחברה החרדית.

Abstract

The Haredi (Jewish ultra-orthodox) population in Israel is an idiosyncratic community. Its members are committed to the observance of the Bible and its commandments, as interpreted by its sectarian religious leaders. Haredi poverty is exceptionally high, with a share of 20% of the Israeli poor and a population share half that size. Its major causes are very high Haredi fertility (a population growth of 6% p.a.), reducing household income per capita and the mother’s earning capacity; its independent education system’s neglect (particularly among boys) of materially important subjects for future earning capacity such as Mathematics, English and digital skills; and low labor-force participation of Haredi men, due to prolonged learning in religious seminars (Yeshiva), often deeply into the prime working age. A further cause for the sharp increase in poverty in the short term has been the recent large cuts in child benefit payments. The estimation of the size and composition of the Haredi population is based on data from the Israeli Social Survey. Poverty calculations are based on an innovative way of optimally matching data on Haredi group membership from that source with data in the Household Expenditure Survey, thus allowing for improved identification of poor Haredi households compared to previous studies. Poverty is calculated both on a needs-based approach and on the (official) relative approach. The share of Haredi children up to age 4 is nearly 3 times higher than in the Jewish non-Haredi society. This, together with the empirical regularity of a negative relationship between poverty and age, implies an upward trend for Haredi and overall Israeli poverty over time. Haredi Poverty, as measured by the distribution-sensitive Sen-poverty index, nearly doubled over the last three years after a previous significant improvement. This deterioration stands in contrast to developments in the rest of the Israeli-Jewish society, whose poverty intensity increased only slightly over the last couple of years. In 2004 the Haredi men’s labor force participation of 37% only slightly exceeded one half that of the general Jewish population, mainly due to the high enrollment of Haredi men in religious seminars (Yeshiva) during their prime working age. Despite their much higher fertility, women function as the family’s main providers, with a participation rate of 48%, compared to 58% of non-Haredi women.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Bank of Israel and Ben-Gurion University
• English Title: Poverty and Labor Market Behavior in the Ultra-Orthodox Population in Israel
• Language: Hebrew
• Keywords: Poverty; Religion; Israel; Ethnic groups; Ultra-Orthodox; Alternative Poverty Measures
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J15 - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants ; Non-labor Discrimination

References

Berman, Eli, 2000. “Sect, Subsidy, and Sacrifice: An Economist’s View of Ultra-Orthodox Jews,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3) (August): 904-952. Berman, Eli, and Ruth Klinov, 1997. “Human Capital Investment and Nonparticipation: Evidence from a Sample with Infinite Horizons (Or: Mr. Jewish Father Stops Going to Work),” The Maurice Falk Institute for Economic Research in Israel, Discussion Paper no. 97.05, Jerusalem. Bradshaw, Jonathan, Naomi Finch, and Daphne Soo, 2005. “Can Policy Influence Fertility?” Social Policy Research Unit, York University. Buchanan, James M., 1965. “An Economic Theory of Clubs,” Economica (New Series) 32 (125): 1-14. Buhmann, B., L. Rainwater, G. Schmaus, and T.M. Smeeding, 1988. “Equivalence Scales, Well-Being,Inequality and Poverty: Sensitivity of Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database,” Review of Income and Wealth 34 (2): 155-142. Chiswick, Barry R., and Jidong Huang, 2006. “The Earnings of American Jewish Men: Human Capital, Denomination and Religiosity,” IZA Discussion Paper 2301, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany. Citro, Constance F., and Robert T. Michael (eds.), 1995. “Measuring Poverty: A New Approach,” National Research Council, NAP, Washington DC. Gottlieb, Daniel, and Leonid Kushnir, 2006. “An Optimal Method of Binary Information Transfer (BIT) Between Surveys of an Identical Population: Poverty among the Jewish Ultra-Orthodox in Israel: A Case Study of BIT,” Discussion Paper no. 06-06, August 2006, Monaster Center for Economic Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva. Gottschalk, Peter, and Timothy M. Smeeding, 1997. “Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality,” Journal of Economic Literature 35 (2): 633-687. Hatfield, Michael, 2002. “Constructing the Revised Market Basket Mechanism,” T-01-1E, April,Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development, Canada. Iceland, John, 2005. “NAS Workshop,” Summary Report, Maryland University, August, US Census Bureau. McNown, Robert, and Cristobal Ridao-Cano, 2002. “The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada,” Discussion Papers in Economics, no. 02-05,Center for Economic Analysis, Colorado University. Sen, Amartya K., and James E. Foster, 1997. On Economic Inequality, Enlarged Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. Zaidi, Asghar, and Tania Burchardt, 2003. “Comparing Incomes when Needs Differ: Equivalisation of the Extra Costs of Disability in the UK,” Discussion Paper, Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London.