The other side of the coin: The privatization phenomenon and realization of public welfare in a Single European Health Care System? A sketch from the perspective of the economic theory of law

Janoska, Wilfried (2012): The other side of the coin: The privatization phenomenon and realization of public welfare in a Single European Health Care System? A sketch from the perspective of the economic theory of law. Published in: Crisis Aftermath: Economic policy changes in the EU and its Member States, Conference Proceedings, Szeged, University of Szeged , Vol. ISBN 9, (2012): pp. 391-411.

Abstract

The commonwealth cannot be equated with the state nor can the common good of society be sustained by government action alone. Rather, the activities of all members of society are crucial importance. Such private sector activities also define the development of national healthcare markets in the convergence to a single health care market in the EU. The desired result of securing reliable and socially equitable provision of the people was associated with considerable costs for responsible administrative units. Especially in times of weak economic activity, this led to a significant burden on public budgets. Thus, the disadvantages of state activities typically form the starting point for privatizations. The contribution is about the consequences of privatization in the area of public services, particularly public hospitals. It is based on the methods of economic theory of law and introduces the importance of the reservations of the “desired” and “feasible” towards the creation of a mandate to the EU in the health sector. Question is whether and to what extent the state is losing its influence on public health structures, and what consequences it can have, if the services are not permanently guaranteed by any other means. Such a transformation process raises the question whether the reversal of privatization, i.e. of a hospital, does fall within the remit of the EU. In the alternative, whether an obligation of the EU arises, to create a (buffering compensatory) framework for such community projects. The parallels are obvious to the financial sector.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: privatization/socialization; EU health care mandate; law and economics
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I11 - Analysis of Health Care Markets; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; K - Law and Economics > K0 - General > K00 - General; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K32 - Environmental, Health, and Safety Law; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P14 - Property Rights; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis

References

Alchian, A.A. – Demsetz, H. (1972): Production, Information Costs. And Economic Organization. The American Economic Review, 62, 5, pp. 777-795.

Ariely, D. (2008): Denken hilft zwar, nütz aber nichts. Warum wir immer wieder unvernünftige Entscheidungen treffen (Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions) Droemer, München.

Becker, G. (1999): Der ökonomische Ansatz zur Erklärung menschlichen Verhaltens (The Economic Approach to Human Behavior). Mohr, Tübingen.

Bizer, K. (2002): Ökonomisch-juristische Institutionenanalyse – Ziele und praktische Anwendung (Economic and Legal Institutions Analysis – Aims and Practical Apllication). In Bizer, K. – Führ, M. – Hüttig, C. (eds.): Responsive Regulierung: Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Institutionenanalyse und Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung (Responsive regulation: Contributions to Interdisciplinary Analysis of Institutions and Regulatory Impact Assessment). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 143-166.

Braun, W. (2010): Die (Psycho-) Logik des Entscheidens. Fallstricke, Strategien und Techniken im Umgang mit schwierigen Situationen (The (Psycho-) Logic of the Decision-making. Pitfalls, Strategies and Techniques for Dealing With Difficult Situations). Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.

Brennan, H. G. – Buchanan, J.M. (1993): Die Begründung von Regeln. Konstitutionelle politische Ökonomie. (The Reason of Rules. Constitutional Political Economy). Mohr, Tübingen.

Brenner, N. (2009): New state spaces. Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press, New York.

Broß, S. (2007): Privatisierung öffentlicher Aufgaben – Gefahren für die Steuerungsfähigkeit von Staaten und für das Gemeinwohl? Vortrag vom 22.01.2007 in Stuttgart (Privatization of Services – Threats to the Control Abilities of States and for the Common Good? Lecture on 22nd January 2007). Retrieved 9th January 2012, from: http://www.rosalux.de/uploads /media/Privatisierung-Bro.pdf

Burgi, M. (2008): Privatisierung öffentlicher Aufgaben. Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten, Grenzen, Regelungsbedarf (Privatization of Public Functions. Design, Possibilities, Limits, Regulation Requirements). Beck, München.

Cooter, R. – Ulen, T. (2008): Law & economics. Pearson/Addison-Wesley, Boston.

Dörner, D. (2002): Die Logik des Mißlingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen (The Logic of Failure. Strategic Thinking in Complex Situations). Rowohlt, Reinbek.

Eidenmüller, H. (2005): Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts (Efficiency as a Legal Principle. Opportunities and Limits of Economic Analysis of Law). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.

Engel, C. (1998): Nebenwirkungen wirtschaftsrechtlicher Instrumente (Side Effects of Economic Regulatory Instruments). In Engel, C. (ed.): Öffentliches Recht als ein Gegenstand ökonomischer Forschung. Die Begegnung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehre mit der Konstitutionellen Politischen Ökonomie (Public Law as a Subject of Economic Research. The German Constitutional Law Meets the Constitutional Political Economy). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 172-205.

Esser, H. (2002): Soziologie: spezielle Grundlagen. Situationslogik und Handeln (Sociology: Special Foundations. Situation Logic and Action). Campus, Frankfurt/Main.

European Commission (2000): KOM (2000) 580: Mitteilung der Kommission zu Leistungen der Daseinsvorsorge in Europa (Commission Communication on Services of General Interest in Europe). Retrieved 8th January 2011, from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri= COM: 2000:0580:FIN:DE:PDF.

European Court of Justice (1991a): Régie des télégraphes et des téléphones (Governance of Telegraph and Telephone). Judgement of 13th December 1991. In Hummer, W. – Vedder, C. – Folz, H.-P. (2005): Europarecht in Fällen. Die Rechtsprechung des EuGH, des EuG und deutscher und österreichischer Gerichte (European Law in Cases. The Jurisprudence of the ECJ, the CFI and the German and Austrian courts). Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft, Baden-Baden.

European Court of Justice (1991b): Porto di Genova (Port of Genoa). Judgement of 10th December 1991. In Hummer, W. – Vedder, C. – Folz, H.-P. (2005): Europarecht in Fällen. Die Rechtsprechung des EuGH, des EuG und deutscher und österreichischer Gerichte (European Law in Cases. The Jurisprudence of the ECJ, the CFI and the German and Austrian courts). Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft, Baden-Baden.

European Court of Justice (1993): Strafverfahren gegen Paul Corbeau (Criminal Proceeding against Paul Corbeau). Judgement of 19th May 1993. In Hummer, W. –Vedder, C. – Folz, H.-P. (2005): Europarecht in Fällen. Die Rechtsprechung des EuGH, des EuG und deutscher und österreichischer Gerichte (European Law in Cases. The Jurisprudence of the ECJ, the CFI and the German and Austrian courts). Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft, Baden-Baden.

Federal Finance Office (2000): Perspektiven der Privatisierungspolitik des Bundes (Perspectives of the Privatization Policy of the Federal Government in Germany). Retrieved 14th January 2011, from: http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/nn_3996/DE/BMF__Startseite/Service/Downloads/Abt__VIII/Perspektiven_20der_20Privatisierungspolitik,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf

Federal Finance Office (2005): Bundesbeteiligungen: Aufgaben und Ziele (Federal Invest-ments: Tasks and Objectives). Retrieved 7th January 2011, from: http://www.bundesfinanzminis-terium.de/nn_3992/DE/Wirtschaft__und__Verwaltung/Bundesliegenschaften__und__Bundesbeteiligungen/Aufgaben__und__Ziele/node.html?__nnn=true.

Federal Constitution Court (1954): Investitionshilfe (Investment Aid). Beschluss vom 20.07.1954. In: BVerfGE 4: 7–27.

Federal Constitution Court (1972): Numerus clausus I. Urteil vom 18.07.1972. In: BVerfGE 33: 303–358.

Federal Constitution Court (1982): Rundfunkanstalten – Freie Mitarbeiter (Broadcasting organizations - Freelancer) Beschluss vom 13.01.1982. In: BVerfGE 59: 231–274.

Federal Constitution Court (1996): Kindererziehungszeiten (Parenting Time). Beschluss vom 12.03.1996. In: BVerfGE 94: 241–267.

Federal Constitution Court (2008): Enteignungen nach dem Energiewirtschaftsrecht (Expropriation by the Energy Law). Beschluss vom 10. September 2008. Retrieved 14th January 2011, from: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rk20080910_1bvr191402.html.

Federal Office of Statistics (2011): Gesundheit – Grunddaten der Krankenhäuser 2010 – FS 12 R. 6.1.1. (Health – Basic Data of the Hospitals in 2010 – FS 12 R. 6.1.1). Retrieved 14th January 2011, from: http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/GrunddatenKrankenhaeuser2120611107004,property=file.pdf.

Flecker, J. – Jeferys, S. – Verhoest, K. – Kozek, W. – Schulten, T. – Thörnqvist, C. (2010): Pique: Privatisation and Liberalisation of Public Services – Improving the Regulatory Framework. Retrieved 14th January 2011, from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy-briefs-pique_en.pdf

Führ, M. (2002): Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit als methodischer Brückenschlag (The Principle of Proportionality as a methodological Bridge). In Bizer, K. – Führ, M. – Hüttig, C. (eds.): Responsive Regulierung: Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Institutionenanalyse und Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung (Responsive regulation: Contributions to Interdisciplinary Analysis of Institutions and Regulatory Impact Assessment). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 91-113.

Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-M. (2008): Die Entwicklung der Gesundheitsökonomie und ihre methodischen Ansätze (The Development of Health Economics and Methodology). In Schöffski, O.(ed.): Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen (Health Economic Evaluations). Springer, Berlin, pp. 13-22.

Haarländer, S. (2007): Public Private Partnership (PPP) im Krankenhausbereich (Public Private Partnership (PPP) in the Hospital Sector). HERZ (11), Burgdorf.

Hantrais, L. (2007): Social Policy in the European Union. Palgrave MacMillan, New York.

Heinig, H. M. (2008): Der Sozialstaat im Dienst der Freiheit. Zur Formel vom "sozialen" Staat in Art. 20 Abs. 1 GG (The Social State in the Service of Freedom. To the Formula of "Social" State in Article 20 Paragraph 1 GG). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.

Janoska, W. – Thöni, M. (2009): Der Privatisierungsprozess im deutschen Krankenhauswesen – eine rechtsökonomische Skizze oder die Auswirkungen des „Schlanken Staates” auf den Versorgungsauftrag (The Privatization Process in the German Hospital Sector – an Economic Analysis of Law’s Sketch about the Impact of the „Lean State“ on the Public Service Mandate). Recht und Politik im Gesundheitswesen (RPG) 15, 4, pp. 90-97.

Jensen, M. – Meckling, W. (1976): Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305-360.

Kerber, W. (1998): Grenzen der Wirtschaftspolitik (Limits of Economic Policy). In Engel, C. (ed.): Öffentliches Recht als ein Gegenstand ökonomischer Forschung. Die Begegnung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehre mit der Konstitutionellen Politischen Ökonomie (Public Law as a Subject of Economic Research. The German Constitutional Law Meets the Constitutional Political Economy). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 207 - 218

Kersting, W. (2008): Gerechtigkeitsethische Überlegungen zur Gesundheitsversorgung (Equity and Ethical Considerations in health care). In Schöffski, O.(ed.): Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen (Health Economic Evaluations). Springer, Berlin, pp. 23-47.

Kies, F. (1998): Der Versorgungsauftrag des Plankrankenhauses (The Mission of German Public Hospitals). Lang, Frankfurt am Main.

Kingreen T. (2003): Das Sozialstaatsprinzip im europäischen Verfassungsverbund. Gemeinschafts-rechtliche Einflüsse auf das deutsche Recht der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung (The Social State Principle in the European Constitution Composite. Influences of the European Community to the German Law of Statutory Health Insurance) Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.

Knauff, M. (2010): Die Daseinsvorsorge im Vertrag von Lissabon (The General Interest and the Treaty of Lisbon). In: Europarecht (EuR) 45, 6, pp. 725-746.

Lauterbach, K.W. – Lüngen, M. – Schrappe, M. (2010): Gesundheitsökonomie, Management und Evidence-based Medicine. Handbuch für Praxis, Politik und Studium (Health Economics, Management and Evidence-Based Medicine. A Handbook for Practice, Policy and Studies). Schattauer GmbH Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften, Stuttgart.

Lorenz, H-W. (2009): Complexity in Economic Theory and Real Economic Life. European Review, 17, 2, pp. 203-421.

Lübke, J. (2010): Öffentliches Kapital und öffentliches Interesse (Public Capital and Public Interest). Europarecht (EuR), 46, EuR – added booklet 1, pp. 99-144.

Luhmann, N. (2008): Legitimation durch Verfahren (Legitimation by procedure). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Majone, G. (2005): Dilemmas of European Integration – The Ambiguities & Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford University Press, New York.

Matschke, M. J. – Hering, T. (1998): Kommunale Finanzierung (Municipal Finance). Oldenbourg-Verlag, München, Wien.

Mérő, L. (2007): Die Logik der Unvernunft. Spieltheorie und die Psychologie des Handelns (Moral Calculations: Game Theory, Logic and Human Frailty). Rowohlt, Reinbek.

Möstl, M. (2011): Art. 87e GG – Fortbestehende Grundverantwortung (Article 87e GG – Persistent Primary Responsibility). In Maunz, T. – Dürig, G.: Grundgesetz (Basic Law). Verlag C.H. Beck: München (beck-online: http://beck-online.beck.de/Default.aspx?vpath=bibdata/komm/MaunzDuerigKoGG_62/GG/cont/MaunzDuerigKoGG.GG.a87e.glIII.gl 3.glc%2 Ehtm)

Orstrom, E. (2011): Was mehr wird, wenn wir teilen. Vom gesellschaftlichen Wert der Gemeingüter (What will be more, if we share it. From the social value of commons). Oekom Verlag, München.

Pestieau, P. (2006): The welfare state in the European Union. Economic and social perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.

Posner, R. A. (2007): Economic analysis of law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, Austin.

Selten, R. (2001): „What is bounded rationality?” In Gigerenzer G. – Selten R. (eds.), Bounded Rationality the Adaptive Toolbox. Dahlem Workshop Reports. Cambridge (Mass.) London: The MIT Press, pp. 13-36.

Simon, H. A. (1955): A behavioural model of rational choice. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 1, pp. 99-118.

Slot, J.P. (2011): Questionaire – General Topic 3: Public Capital and Private Capital in the Internal Market. Securing a Level Playing Field for Public and Private Enterprises. Europarecht (EuR), 46, EuR – added booklet 1, pp. 91-98

Stiglitz, J.E. (2011): Im freien Fall. Vom Versagen der Märkte zur Neuordnung der Weltwirtschaft (Freefall. America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy). Pantheon, München.

Stilwell, F. (2006): Political Economy: The Contest of Political Ideas. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

The Economist (2012): The rise of state capitalism, In: The Economist, 402, 8768, pp. 11-12.

Triantafyllou, D. (2010): Zur Verantwortung des Staates für die Geldwirtschaft (State Responsibilty for the Monetary Economy). Europarecht (EuR) 45, 5, pp. 585-598

Weber, M. (1922): Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology.) Retrieved 7th January 2011, from: http://www.textlog.de/7295.html.

Williamson, O. E. (2010): Die ökonomischen Institutionen des Kapitalismus. Unternehmen, Märkte, Kooperation. (The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Companies, Markets, Cooperation) Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.