Turturean, Monica and TURTUREAN, Ciprian Ionel (2012): Comparative analysis of students training needs regarding Internet and its effects. Published in: "Liveraging technology for learning", Editura Universitara, Bucuresti, 2012 No. ISSN 2066-026X (26. April 2012): pp. 358-356.
Download (99Kb) | Preview
In this article we will try to realize a comparative study in order to find out if the internet has a positive or a negative role for undergraduate’s university students. The purpose of this study is to identify the perception of undergraduate university students regarding the effects of the internet for their scientific activities and their training needs. The study is based on data obtained from the application of a sample survey which studies the opinion of undegraduate students regarding the role of internet in students education. The sample size was 496 students (students from „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi and from „Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Comparative analysis of students training needs regarding Internet and its effects|
|English Title:||Comparative analysis of students training needs regarding Internet and its effects|
|Keywords:||higher education; internet role; attitude; academic performance, students’ training needs|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I23 - Higher Education Research Institutions
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
|Depositing User:||Monica TURTUREAN|
|Date Deposited:||03. Aug 2012 07:26|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 00:09|
1. Angrist, J. D.; Lavy, V., 2002, New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning, Economic Journal. No. 112, pp. 735-765.
2. Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Gupta, A. & Sanocki, E., 2002, Asynchronous collaboration around multimedia applied to on-demand education, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4, 117–145.
3. CEO Forum, 2001, Year 4 STaR Report [Online]. Available: www.electronicschool.com/2001/09/0901ewire.html#forum
4. DeBell, M. and Chapman, C., 2006, Computer and Internet Use by Students in 2003 (NCES 2006-065), National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, pp. 1-62.
5. Driscoll, M., 2002, How people learn (and what technology might have to do with it). ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology Syracuse, NY. Retrieved 5 January 2006 from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-3/learn.html
6. Fuchs, T.; Woessmann, L., 2004, Computers and Stuent Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School, CESifo Working Paper. No. 1321. November. Munich.
7. Goolsbee, A., Guryan, J.,2002,. The Impact of Internet Subsidies in Public Schools, NBER Working Paper. No. 9090.
8. Kirkpatrick, H.; Cuban, H.,1998, Computers Make Kids Smarter–right?, Technos Quarterly. No. 7.
9. Kulik, J. A., 1994, Meta-analysis Study of Findings on Computer-based Instruction;In: E. L. Baker; H. F. O’Neil. Technology Assessment in Education and Training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.