Ghafele, Roya and D. O’Brien, Robert (2012): Open innovation for sustainability: Lessons from the GreenXchange experience. Published in: International Centre on Trade and Sustainable Development Policy Brief No. 13 (June 2012): pp. 1-10.
Download (571kB) | Preview
Despite its rising popularity, open innovation has received relatively limited attention in the discussion of how to implement ‘green’ innovation, a fact which is of particular relevance within the context of the Rio+20 summit 2012. The GreenXchange (GX), which was launched in 2010 by Nike along with nine other organizations, is an important exception to this trend. The GX is a web-based marketplace for intellectual property (IP), which appears not to have lived up entirely to the original expectations set out at its creation. Other than Nike, only one other company – Best Buy – has agreed to place its IP assets on the GX and the vast majority of the posted IP cannot be used in the creation of commercial products. This paper explores in what ways the GX exemplifies both the usefulness and limitations of open innovation for sustainability and discusses the lessons that can be drawn from the GX experience in terms of the broader thinking on innovation, intellectual property and sustainability. It concludes by proposing ways that can help such initiatives be made to function better.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Open innovation for sustainability: Lessons from the GreenXchange experience|
|Keywords:||open innovation, sustainability, platform technologies, intellectual property commercialization, climate change mitigation|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
|Depositing User:||Roya Ghafele|
|Date Deposited:||03. Aug 2012 07:34|
|Last Modified:||12. May 2015 12:33|
Arora, A. 1995. Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market for know-how. Economics of innovation and new technology 4, no. 1: 41–60.
Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. 2001. Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 2: 419.
Caves, R. E, H. Crookell, and J. P Killing. 1983.The Imperfect Market for Technology Licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 45, no. 3: 249–267.
Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Chesbrough, H. 2006. Emerging secondary markets for Intellectual Property. Research Report to National Center for Industrial Property Information and Traning (NCIPI).
Feldman, M. P, and R. Florida. 1994. The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, no. 2: 210–229.
Galasso, A. 2007. Broad cross-license agreements and persuasive patent litigation: theory and evidence from the semiconductor industry. EI, 45. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Paper, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6718/
Ghafele R., J. Malackowski & B. Gibert. Emerging IP Monetization Techniques. The Institutionalization of an Intellectual Property Exchange. Accepted by International Journal of Intellectual Property Management. 15. 5.2011
Meniere, Y. and S. Parlane. 2010. Decentralized licensing of complementary patents: Comparing the royalty fixed-free and two-part tariff regimes. Information Economics and Policy 22, no. 2: 178-191.
Teece, D. J. 1988. Technological change and the nature of the firm. Technical change and economic theory: 256.
Teece, David J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15, no.
6 (December): 285-305. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2. ‘Davos: Nike and Partners Launch The GreenXchange’,
Viscounty, P. J, M. W De Vries, and E. M Kennedy. 2006. Patent auctions: emerging trend? The National Law Journal 27, no. 86: S12.
GX consultant (2012). Interview conducted on 17 May 2012.
‘The GreenXchange’ (2010) Davos hand-out produced by Nike and Creative Commons. Available from: <http://sciencecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/GX- Davos-Booklet.pdf> (accessed 19 May 2012).
‘GreenXchange: Partners Collaboratory’ (2011). Greenxchange.cc January 23. Available from: <http://greenxchange.cc/info/release/1-23-2011> (accessed 23 May 2012).
Greenxchange.cc (2012) ‘The GreenXchange: Accelerating sustainable innovation through IP sharing’ (official website of the GreenXchange). Available from: <http://greenxchange.cc/> (accessed 23 May 2012).
Mazur, Agnes (2009) ‘Green Exchange: Creating a Meta-Map of Sustainability’,
WorldChanging May 5. Available from: <http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009822.html> (accessed 22 May 2012)
Nike employee (2012). Interview conducted on 11 May 2012 Tapscott, Dan (2010)
Bloomberg Businessweek January 27. Available from: <http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2010/01/davos_nike_an d.html> (accessed 21 May 2012).