Chu, Angus C. and Furukawa, Yuichi (2012): Patents versus R&D subsidies in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure.
Download (94Kb) | Preview
This letter explores the different implications of patent breadth and R&D subsidies on economic growth and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian model. We find that the two policy instruments have the same positive effect on economic growth when the model exhibits scale effects under a fixed number of firms. When the model becomes scale-invariant under an endogenous number of firms, patent breadth increases economic growth but decreases the number of firms, whereas R&D subsidies increase the number of firms but decrease economic growth.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Patents versus R&D subsidies in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure|
|Keywords:||economic growth; endogenous market structure; patents; R&D subsidies|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General
|Depositing User:||Angus C. Chu|
|Date Deposited:||06. Aug 2012 12:17|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 22:02|
Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.
Chu, A., 2011. The welfare cost of one-size-fits-all patent protection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 876-890.
Chu, A., and Furukawa, Y., 2011. On the optimal mix of patent instruments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1964-1975.
Chu, A., Pan, S., and Sun, M., 2012. When does elastic labor supply cause an inverted-U effect of patents on innovation?. Economics Letters, 117, 211-213.
Etro, F., 2009. Endogenous Market Structures and the Macroeconomy. New York and Berlin: Springer.
Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C., 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 106-112.
Goh, A.-T., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43, 1191--1214.
Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.
Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2012. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, forthcoming.
Laincz, C., and Peretto, P., 2006. Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation not specification. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 263-288.
Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164-C179.
Peretto, P., 1996. Sunk costs, market structure, and growth. International Economic Review, 37, 895-923.
Peretto, P., 1999. Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195.
Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological progress. Journal of Political Economy 98, S71--S102.
Segerstrom, P., 2000. The long-run growth effects of R&D subsidies. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 277-305.
Segerstrom, P., Anant, T.C.A. and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91.
Available Versions of this Item
Patents versus R&D subsidies in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure. (deposited 06. Aug 2012 12:17)
Patents versus R&D subsidies in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure. (deposited 15. Jul 2013 15:44)
- Patents, R&D subsidies and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. (deposited 27. Sep 2013 04:44)
- Patents versus R&D subsidies in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure. (deposited 15. Jul 2013 15:44)