Rehman, Kashif-Ur- and Hunjra, Ahmed Imran and Safwan, Nadeem and Ahmad, Abrar (2009): Students’ attitude towards the uses of internet. Published in: International Journal of Business and Management , Vol. 5, No. 6 (2010): pp. 46-55.
Download (141kB) | Preview
Internet is a useful tool for all in a technologically advanced world. Internet use for education is very important. It is now in practice to teach school to college to get more out of it. In this study, the emphasis is given on the most important success factor that investigates about Internet usage by students of the University, whether it is an effective learning tool for students and teachers and also examines the level of use Internet and whether the Internet is useful for distance learners. The sample of the data is taken from the universities of the twin cities (Islamabad and Rawalpindi). The quantitative technique for data analysis was SPSS. The results reveal that most students find that the Internet knowledge is essential for students and teachers. Above all respondents in the questionnaire that students feel comfortable using the Internet and provides substantial information and half of those surveyed felt that Internet use is difficult in school. Results show that the Internet is easier to use then the collection of research tools, while the Internet is very important. It is recommended that students should align their potential for significant and positive use of the Internet. Further it is recommended also to educate students to use basic Internet tools.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Students’ attitude towards the uses of internet|
|Keywords:||Technologically advance world, education purposes, effective tool, Internet usage|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software|
|Depositing User:||Ahmed Imran Hunjra|
|Date Deposited:||16. Aug 2012 09:46|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 22:35|
Amoroso, D. L., & Cheney, P. H. (1998). Testing a Causal Model of end-user Environment: an Empirical Investigation. Information and Management, 14, 107-113.
Applebome, P. (1999). Distance learning. Retrieved from http://www.education.com Oct 12 ,2009 (April 4, 1999) Aydn, C. H. (2001). Uses of Internet in Turkey, Educational technology research & development, V 49, Washington. ISSN: 10421629.
Bayram, S., & Uzuncarsılı. U. (1998). Virtual classrooms on the Web: Problems and solution in Turkey. Conference of the European Educational Research Association, Scottish Council for Research in Education (SCRE) and European Conference on Educational Research, 17-28September, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bell, P. (2000). Scientific argument as learning artifacts designing for learning from the Web with KIE, International. Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
Benenson, G. (2001). The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 730-745.
Chadwick, C. (2002). Why computers are failing in the education of our children. Educational Technology, 42, 35-40.
Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 47, 63-69.
Dede, C. (1996). Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10, 4-36.
DeWitt, S. (2003). Multicultural democracy and inquiry pedagogy. Intercultural Education, 14, 279-290.
Falvo, D.R., (1994), Effective Patient Education: A guide to increased compliance. (2nd ed). An Aspen publication, USA.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1987), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Classification of Methods and Implications for Marketing Research, in Review of Marketing, M. J. Houston (ed.), American Marketing Association, Chicago, 407-450.
Forsyth, I. (1998). Teaching and learning materials and the Internet. (2nd Ed.). London: Kogan.
Gladieux, L., & Swail(1999). The virtual university and educational opportunities: Issues of equity and access for the next generation. Washington, DC: College Board.
Gorman, L. (2003). Unbounded classrooms: NSW HSC. [Online] Available http://www.global educator.com. Iakushina, E.V. (2002). Adolescents on the Internet: A specific charter of information interaction. Russian Education and Society, 44, 81-95.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 127–143.
Lee, S & Kim, B., G (2009). Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 191-201.
McKenzie, J. (1998). Grazing the net: Rising a generation of free-range students. PhiDelta Kappan [online] available: http://www.fno.org/text/grazing.html (Sept, 1998)
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student web use, perceptions of information credibility and verification behavior. Computers and Education, 41, 271–290.
Molebash, P. (1999). Technology and education: current and future trends, Information Technology Journal. [Online] Available: http://etext.virginia.edu/journals/itjournal/1999 /molebash.html (December 8, 2000)
Oral, B. (2008). The evaluation of the student teachers' attitudes toward Internet and democracy. Computers & Education, 50(1), 437-445.
Özgen, H., Maraslı, H., & Yalçın, A. (1996). Türkiye'de uzaktan egitim için uygulanabilir bir model önerisi. A Model Proposal for Distance Education Through Internet in Turkey. First International Distance Education Symposium, 529-535).
Pin, K., C. & Chung, C., T. (2009). Teachers' attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53(1), 66-73.
Risinger, F. (1998). Global education and the World Wide Web. Social Education, 62, 276-277.
Selwyn, N. (1999). Students' attitudes towards computers in sixteen to nineteen education. Education and Information Technology, 4(2), 129-141.
Selwyn, N., Marriott, N., & Marriott, P. (2000). Net gains or net pains? Business students’ use of the Internet. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(2).
Shiveley, J., & VanFossen, P. (2000). Using the Internet to create primary source teaching packets. The Social Studies, 91, 244-252.
Slate, J.R., Manuel, M., & Brinson, JR.K. (2002). The “digital divide”: Hispanic college students’ views of educational uses of the Internet. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 75-93.
Spennemann, D. H. R. (2006). The internet and daily life in Australia: an exploration. The Information Society, 22, 101-110.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 125–143.
Tsai, C., C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: The differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1092-1103.
Usun, S. (2003). Undergraduate Students Attitudes towards Educational Uses of Internet, Interactive Educational Multimedia,, 7, 46-62.
Wright, V. H., & Marsh, G. E. (2000). Technology and teaching: a turning point. [online]: Available: http://computed.coe.wayne.edu/vol5/wright% 26Marsh.htm (December 12, 2000.)