Vivas-Augier, Carlos and Barge-Gil, Andrés (2012): Impact on firms of the use of knowledge providers: a systematic review of the literature.
Download (121Kb) | Preview
This study summarizes the main conclusions from a systematic review of the empirical literature regarding the impact on firms of the use of knowledge providers, including universities, technology institutes or knowledge intensive business firms. We use a criteria to classify the literature according to the research question addressed: (i) Which firms use knowledge providers?; (ii) Do firms using them achieve better results?; (iii) Which firms benefit more from using knowledge providers? Stylized facts are that larger, more R&D intensive and high tech firms are more likely to use knowledge providers and that use of knowledge providers is associated to firms higher technical results. Less attention has been paid to the third question so that no stylized facts can be developed on it. Three important recommendations for future research emerge. First, to pay more attention to methodological issues, such as sample selection and endogeneity, which may potentially bias the results. Second, to develop comparative analysis of the differential features of different knowledge providers. Third, to take depth and breadth of collaborations into account.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Impact on firms of the use of knowledge providers: a systematic review of the literature|
|Keywords:||Impact Assessment; Firms; Knowledge Providers; Collaboration; Innovation; R&D; Industry; Literature Review|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I20 - General
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General
|Depositing User:||Andrés Barge-Gil|
|Date Deposited:||07. Sep 2012 10:21|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 05:05|
Adams, J.D.; Chiang, E.P.; Jensen, J.L. (2003). The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 85(4), 1003-1020.*
Amara, N.; Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey. Technovation, vol. 25(3), 245-259.
Arranz, N.; de Arroyabe, J.C.F. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, vol. 28(1-2), 88-100.
Arvanitis, S.; Sydow, N.; Woerter, M. (2008). Is there any impact of university-industry knowledge transfer on innovation and productivity? An empirical analysis based on swiss firm data. Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 32(2), 77-94.*
Arvanitis, S.; Woerter, M. (2009). Firms' transfer strategies with universities and the relationship with firms' innovation performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 18(6), 1067-1106.
Aschhoff, B.; Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation-Happy Together? Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 33(1), 41-62.
Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Technovation, vol. 30(3), 195-206.
Barge-Gil, A.; Modrego, A. (2011). The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants. Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 36(1), 61-83.
Becker, W.; Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, vol. 33(2), 209-223.*
Belderbos, R.; Carree, M.; Diederen, B.; Lokshin, B.; Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 22(8-9), 1237-1263.*
Belderbos, R.; Carree, M.; Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, vol. 33(10), 1477-1492.*
Belderbos, R.; Carree, M.; Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 28(4), 401-426.
Bennett, R.J.; Robson, P.J.A.; Bratton, W.J.A. (2001). Government advice networks for SMEs: an assessment of the influence of local context on Business Link use, impact and satisfaction. Applied Economics, vol. 33(7), 871-885.
Bercovitz, J.E.L.; Feldman, M.P. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, vol. 36(930-948.
Cohen, W.M.; Nelson, R.R.; Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, vol. 48(1), 1-23.
Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy. In press
Fabrizio, K.R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, vol. 38(2), 255-267.
Fey, C.F. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, vol. 31(4), 597-621.
Fontana, R.; Geuna, A.; Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, vol. 35(2), 309-323.*
Freel, M.S.; Harrison, R.T. (2006). Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from 'Northern Britain'. Regional Studies, vol. 40(4), 289-305.
Frenz, M.; Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, vol. 38(7), 1125-1135.*
Fritsch, M. (2001). Co-operation in regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, vol. 35(4), 297-307.
Fritsch, M.; Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, vol. 30(2), 297-312.*
Garcia-Aracil, A.; De Lucio, I.F. (2008). Industry-university interactions in a peripheral European region: An empirical study of Valencian firms. Regional Studies, vol. 42(2), 215-227.
George, G.; Zahra, S.A.; Wood, D.R. (2002). The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 17, 577-609.
Geroski, P. (1992). Antitrust policy towards co-operative R&D ventures. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 9, 58-71.
Grimaldi, R.; von Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Sectoral determinants of performance in collaborative R&D projects. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 25(8), 766-778.
Guan, J.C.; Yam, R.C.M.; Mok, C.K. (2005). Collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing, China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 17(3), 339-353.
Jaffe, A. (2008). The Science of Science Policy: reflections on the important questions and the challenges they present. Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 33, 131-139.
Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, vol. 31, 477-492.
Hall, B.H.; Link, A.N.; Scott, J.T. (2003). Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 85(2), 485-491.*
Heirman, A.; Clarysse, B. (2007). Which tangible and intangible assets matter for innovation speed in start-ups? Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 24(4), 303-315.
Johnson, S.; Webber, D.J.; Thomas, W. (2007). Which SMEs use external business advice? A multivariate subregional study. Environment and Planning A, vol. 39(8), 1981-1997.
Keizer, J.A.; Dijkstra, L.; Halman, J.I.M. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs. An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technovation, vol. 22(1), 1-13.
Kim, H.; Park, Y. (2008). The impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance in Korea: A Bayesian network approach. Scientometrics, vol. 75(3), 535-554.
Knudsen, M.P. (2007). The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 24(2), 117-138.
Lambrecht, J.; Pirnay, F. (2005). An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 17(2), 89-108.*
Laursen, K.; Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, vol. 33(8), 1201-1215.*
Lichtenthaler, U. (2005). External commercialization of knowledge: review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 7(4): 231-255.
Lin, J.L.; Fang, S.C.; Fang, S.R.; Tsai, F.S. (2009). Network embeddedness and technology transfer performance in R&D consortia in Taiwan. Technovation, vol. 29(11), 763-774.
Loof, H.; Brostrom, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 33(1), 73-90.
Lopez, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 26(1), 113-136.
Mackun, P.; Macpherson, A.D. (1997). Externally-assisted product innovation in the manufacturing sector: The role of location, in-house R&D and outside technical support. Regional Studies, vol. 31(7), 659-668.
MacPherson, A. (1997). The contribution of external service inputs to the product development efforts of small manufacturing firms. R & D Management, vol. 27(2), 127-144.
MacPherson, A. (2002). The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation: The case of New York State's medical devices sector. Papers in Regional Science, vol. 81(1), 121-129.
Martin, S. (1996). Protection, promotion and cooperation in the European semiconductor industry. Review of industrial organization, vol. 11, 721-35.
Miotti, L.; Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, vol. 32(8), 1481-1499.*
Mole, K.; Hart, M.; Roper, S.; Saal, D. (2008). Differential gains from Business Link support and advice: a treatment effects approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 26, 315-334.*
Mole, K.F.; Hart, M.; Roper, S.; Saal, D.S. (2009). Assessing the Effectiveness of Business Support Services in England Evidence from a Theory-Based Evaluation. International Small Business Journal, vol. 27(5), 557-582.
Montoro-Sanchez, A.; Mora-Valentin, E.M.; Guerras-Martin, L.A. (2006). R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organisations: a comparative analysis of the characteristics and reasons depending on the nature of the partner. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 35, 156-181.
Mora-Valentin, E.M.; Montoro-Sanchez, A.; Guerras-Martin, L.A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, vol. 33(1), 17-40.
Mowery, D. (1999). Collaborative R&D. How effective is it? Issues in Science and Technology, Fall, 37-44.
Nieto, M.J.; Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, vol. 27(6-7), 367-377.
Nieto, M.J.; Santamaría, L. (2010). Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 48(1), 44-69.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, vol. 13(6), 343-373.
Perkmann, M.; Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 9(4), pp. 259-280.
Robson, P.J.A.; Bennett, R.J. (2000). The use and impact of business advice by SMEs in Britain: an empirical assessment using logit and ordered logit models. Applied Economics, vol. 32, 1675-1688.*
Robson, P.J.A.; Bennett, R.J. (2010). Paying fees for government business advice: an assessment of Business Link experience. Applied Economics, vol. 42(1), 37-48.
Saez, C.B.; Marco, T.G.; Arribas, E.H. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R & D Management, vol. 32(4), 321-341.
Santoro, M.D.; Bierly, P.E. (2006). Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: A knowledge-based perspective. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 53(4), 495-507.
Santoro, M.D.; Saparito, P.A. (2006). Self-interest assumption and relational trust in university-industry knowledge transfers. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 53(3), 335-347.
Segarra-Blasco, A.; Arauzo-Carod, J.M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, vol. 37, 1283-1295.*
Sherwood, A.L.; Covin, J.G. (2008). Knowledge Acquisition in University–Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25, 162-179.
Su, Y.S.;Tsang, E.W.K.; Peng, M.W. (2009). How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 26(2), 309-331.
Tranfield, D.R.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, vol. 14 (3), 207–222.
Tether, B.S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy, vol. 31, 947-967.*
Tödtling, F.; Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, vol. 34(8), 1203-1219
Tsai, K-H.; Hseih, M-H. (2009). How different types of partners influence innovative product sales: Does technological capacity matter? Research Policy, vol. 62, 1321-1328.
Tsai, K-H.; Wang, J-C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy, vol. 38, 518-526.
van Beers, C.; Berghall, E.; Poot, T. (2008). R&D internationalization, R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: Evidence from Finland and the Netherlands. Research Policy, vol. 37(2), 294-308.
Vega-Jurado, J.; Gutierrez-Gracia, A.; Fernandez-de-Lucio, I.; Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation. Research Policy, vol. 37, 616-632.
Vega-Jurado, J.; Gutierrez-Gracia, A.; Fernandez-de-Lucio, I. (2009). Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 18(4), 637-670.
Veugelers, R.; Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 23(5-6), 355-379.
Zeng, S.X.;Xie, X.M.; Tam, C.M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, vol. 30(3), 181-194.
Available Versions of this Item
- Impact on firms of the use of knowledge providers: a systematic review of the literature. (deposited 07. Sep 2012 10:21) [Currently Displayed]