Mariam, Yohannes (2002): The Implication of Incorporating Environmental Costs in Utility Rate Setting.
Download (254kB) | Preview
Electric and natural gas are the two major sources of energy for residents of Washington State. Several states have adopted a policy whereby utility companies decide on the choice of mixes of resources by incorporating cost effectiveness, conservation and externalities.
Externalities could include the direct and indirect environmental and human health cost of using resources such as electricity and gas that are not captured by market prices. Washington State possesses diverse resources that are susceptible to wastes and emissions originating from the consumption of energy. The impact of these wastes could be spatial, short-lived or cumulative. By most accounts the overall impact of pollution on ecosystems could be far-reaching and greater than the quantifiable and monetized impacts of environmental externalities. The need to account for environmental externality becomes even stronger in situations where inter-generational equity is used as a criterion for planning long term resource requirement.
Utility companies in Washington State are not required to explicitly incorporate or account for externality in the development and implementation of Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). IRPs are used by utility companies to facilitate the identification of the least-cost mixes of resources in the delivery of energy to their customers over a long planning horizon. In addition, there are no cases in which utility companies were ordered to incorporate costs of environmental externality in setting rates.
The present study is intended to show the implication of explicitly incorporating externality in rate setting on i) changes in the prices of energy or utility rates, and ii) its contribution toward reducing emissions of selected pollutants. The study will explore situations under which externality estimates from other studies could be utilized to develop energy policies. Furthermore, the study will discuss ways in which increases in costs of using energy as a result of accounting for externality may be shared or accounted.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Implication of Incorporating Environmental Costs in Utility Rate Setting|
|Keywords:||Electricity; natural gas; energy; cost effectiveness; conservation; externalities; environmental and human health; Integrated Resource Plan (IRP); long planning horizon; utility rates; emissions; pollutants|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q41 - Demand and Supply
L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services; Biodiversity Conservation; Bioeconomics; Industrial Ecology
L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities
L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L95 - Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L98 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources
|Depositing User:||Yohannes Mariam|
|Date Deposited:||11. Oct 2006|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 15:36|
1. Ottinger, R.L., Wooley, D.R., Rovinson, N.A., Hodas, D.R. and Babb, S.E.. Environmental Costing of Electricity. New York, N.Y., Oceana Publications, Inc.,1990.
2. Bernow, S., Biewald, B., & Marron, D. The Electricity Journal, 1991, 4(2) : 20 34.
3. Dagupta, P. The Economics of the Environment. Proceedings of the British Academy. Vol. 90, 65-221, 1996.
4. Burtraw, D., and Krupnick, A.J. In Charles G. Stalon, ed., Regulatory Responses to Continuously Changing Industry Structures, Proceedings of the Institute of Public Utilities Twenty Third Annual Conference. East Lansing, Mich., Institute of Public Utilities, Michigan State University, 1992.
5. Cohen, S. D., Eto, J.H., Beldock, J. and Crandall, G.. A Survey of State Regulatory Commission Activities to Incorporate Environmental Externalities into Electric Utility Planning and Regulation. Berkeley, Calif., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1990.
6. Desvousges, W. H., F. R. Johnson, and H. S. Banzhaf. Assessing Environmental Externality Costs for Electricity Generation. NSPC, Minn. December, 1994. 7. Dodds, Daniel E., and Jonathan A. Lesser. Land Economics, 1994, 70(1) 63 76. 8. Energy Information Administration, Electric Generation and Environmental Externalities: Case Studies, DOE/EIA 0598, Washington, DC, September 1995.
9. Hobbs, B. and Meier, P. Integrated Resource Planning and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multi Criteria Decision Methods, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1994.
10. Hobbs, B.F. "What Do SO2 Emissions Cost?, External Costs and Allowance Prices Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments," Case Western Reserve University, 1992.
11. Union of Concerned Scientists, America's Energy Choices, Investing in a Strong Economy and a Clean Environment. Washington, DC, 1991. 12. Energy Policy Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102 486, Stat. 2776 (1992). 13. State Acid Rain Project. Air Quality and Energy Conservation: Cutting the Cost of Clean Air. NESCAUM, Boston, MA , 1988. 14. Stalon, C.G. (ed). Regulatory Responses to Continuously Changing Industry Structures, Proceedings of The Institute of Public Utilities Twenty Third Annual Conference. East Lansing, Mich., Institute of Public Utilities, Michigan State University, 1992. 15. Khan, E. Electric Utility Planning and Regulation, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), 1991. 16. Kahn, E., and R. Gilbert. Competition and Institutional Change in U.S. Electric Power Regulation. University of California, Berkeley, May, 1993. 17. World Bank. World Development Report, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. 18. Hardin, G. 1968. Science, 162.
19. Hohmeyer, O., Ottinger, R.L., and Rennings, K. (eds). Social Costs and Sustainability. Proceedings of an international conference held at Ladenburg, Germany, May 27-30, 1995 (1997). 20. Energy Information Administration. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States, 1997 (October 1998). 21. Nagelhout, Mary. Public Utilities Fortnightly. 1993, March 1, 44 47.
22. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Resources for the Future (RFF). Estimating Externalities of Electricity Fuel Cycles. Washington, D.C., McGraw Hill, 1994. 23. Agathen, Paul A., Public Utilities Fortnightly, 1992, 150:23 24.
24. Consumer Energy Council of America Research Foundation. Incorporating Environmental Externalities into Utility Planning: Seeking a Cost Effective Means of Assuring Environmental Quality. Washington, D.C., 1993.
25. European Commission. Externalities of Fuel Cycles: "Externe" Project," reports 1 8, Directorate General XII, Brussels, 1994 26. Fang, J., and Galen, P. Issues and Methods in Incorporating Environmental Externalities into the Integrated Resource Planning Process, NREL, 1994.
27. Freeman, A. Myrick III, Dallas Burtraw, Winston Harrington, Alan J. Krupnick. The Electricity Journal, 1992, vol. 5, no, 7 , 18 25. 28. Joskow, Paul L. The Electricity Journal, 1992, May, 53 67. 29. Koomey, J., Comparative Analysis of Monetary Estimates of External Costs Associated with Combustion of Fossil Fuels. LBL Report 28213, Berkeley, CA , July 1990.
30. Walther, R. J., and Jurewitz, J.L.. "Including Environmental Externalities and Market- Based Mechanisms in Utility Resource Planning: Some Thoughts and Some Experience," Advanced Workshop in Regulation & Public Utility Economics, San Diego, Calif., 1992. 31. Logan, D., Neil, C., and Taylor, A. Modeling Renewable Energy Resources in Integrated Resource Planning, RCG Hagler, Bailly, Inc., 1994.
32. Tschirhart, John. The Energy Journal, 1994, 15, 1:121 128. 33. Jorgenson, Dale, and Peter Wilcoxen. Journal of Policy Modeling, 1990, 12, 4, 715 744. 34 Heslin, James S., and Benjamin F. Hobbs. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11989, 4, 3, 836 842. 35. Energy Information Administration, "Evaluation and Verification of Demand Side Management Programs," DOE/EIA 0589(93) (Washington, DC, July 1995). 36. Dallas Burtraw, D. and Krupnick, A.J., The Second-Best Use of Social Cost Estimates. Discussion Paper 96-29, August 1996, Resources for the Future Washington, DC . 37. Wang, M. and Santini, D., Monetary Values of Air Pollution Emissions in Various US Regions. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1995.