Rong, Zhao and Feng, Yao (2012): Local spillovers and durable adoption: Evidence from durable consumptions in rural China.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (311kB) | Preview
Purpose – The effects of social learning and network externalities in the diffusion of a new product imply that there should be local spillovers from existing owners to new adopters in a closely-related community. Using the 1999 durable consumption survey data in rural China, this paper examines the importance of local spillovers in the diffusion of two major durable goods, washing machine and refrigerator. Design/methodology/approach – Based on an October 1999 survey of rural durable goods consumption conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) of China, the authors examine the likelihood of rural households adopting a washing machine and a refrigerator during 1998-1999, respectively. Findings – The estimation results indicate that a household is more likely to buy its first durable good in villages where a large share of households already own one. Further evidence suggests that these patterns are unlikely to be explained by unobserved local characteristics. When examined in more detail, the extent of local spillovers appears to be positively related to household education level. Originality/value – Our study reveals the importance of local spillovers in the diffusion of these two durables. Specifically, 64% of washing machine adoptions starting at 1998 are due to the spillovers. For refrigerator adoptions, this percentage is 55%. Furthermore, as far as we know, our study is among the first to test and provide evidence on the interaction between education level and local spillovers based on the learning hypothesis.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Local spillovers and durable adoption: Evidence from durable consumptions in rural China|
|Keywords:||China, Rural households, Local spillovers, Durable adoptions, Washing machine, Refrigerator, Education level|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L68 - Appliances; Other Consumer Durables
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
|Depositing User:||Zhao Rong|
|Date Deposited:||13. Sep 2012 20:17|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 06:50|
Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2005). The diffusion of new agricultural technologies: The case of crossbred-cow technology in Tanzania. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 645-659.
Bandiera, O., & Rasul, I. (2006). Social networks and technology adoption in northern Mozambique. Economic Journal, 116, 869–902.
Becker, G., & Murphy, K., Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Berndt, E., Pindyck, R., & Azoulay, P. (2003). Consumption externalities and diffusion in pharmaceutical markets: Antiulcer drugs. Journal of Industrial Economics, 51, 243-270.
Bertrand M., Luttmer, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2000). Network effects and welfare cultures. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1019-1055.
Case, A.C., & Katz, L.F. (1991). The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths. NBER Working Paper No. 3705.
Church, J., & Gandal, N. (1992). Network effects, software provision, and standardization. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, 85-103.
Conley, T., & Udry, C. (2010). Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Review, 100, 35-69.
Dubin, J.A., & McFadden, D. (1984). An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica, 52, 345-362.
Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2002). Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: The influence of colleagues’ choices. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 121-148.
Duflo, E., Kremer, M., & Robinson, J. (2008). How high are rates of return to fertilizer? Evidence from field experiments in Kenya. American Economic Review, 98, 482-488.
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 70-83.
Foster, A., & Rosenzweig, M. (1995). Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1176-1209.
Foster, A., & Rosenzweig, M. (1996). Technical change and human capital returns and investments: Evidence from the green revolution, American Economic Review, 86, 931-953.
Gandal, N. (1994). Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 160-170.
Goolsbee, A., & Klenow, P. (2002). Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. Journal of Law and Economics, 145, 317-343.
Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 25, 501-522.
Heckman, J.J., & Singer, B. (1985). Social science duration analysis. In J.J. Heckman & B. Singer (Ed.), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data (pp. 39–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irwin, D., & Klenow, P.J. (1994). Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1200-1227.
Karshenas, M., & Stoneman, P. (1993). Rank, stock, order, and epidemic effects in the diffusion of new process technologies: An empirical model. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 503-528.
Lin, J.Y. (1991). Education and innovation adoption: Evidence from hybrid rice in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 713-723.
Lucas, R.E. (1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica, 61, 251-272.
Manski, C.F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531-542.
Manski, C.F. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 115-136.
Munshi, K. (2004). Social learning in a heterogeneous population: Technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 185-213.
Park, S. (2004). Quantitative analysis of network externalities in competing technologies: The VCR case. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 937-945.
Rong, Z., & Yao, Y. (2003). Public service provision and the demand for electric appliances in rural China. China Economic Review, 14, 131-141.
Saloner, G., & Shepard, A. (1995). Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. RAND Journal of Economics, 26, 479-501.
Schultz, T.W. (1975). The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 827-846.
Skinner, J.S., & Staiger, D. (2005). Technology adoption from hybrid corn to beta blockers. NBER Working Paper No. 11251.
Thornton, R., & Thompson, P. (1999). Learning from experience and learning from others: An exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. American Economic Review, 91, 1350-68.
Available Versions of this Item
Local spillovers and learning from neighbors: Evidence from durable adoptions in rural China. (deposited 07. Oct 2011 16:20)
- Local spillovers and durable adoption: Evidence from durable consumptions in rural China. (deposited 13. Sep 2012 20:17) [Currently Displayed]