Determinants of Agricultural Technology adoption: the Case of Improved Pigeonpea Varieties in Tanzania

Simtowe, Franklin (2011): Determinants of Agricultural Technology adoption: the Case of Improved Pigeonpea Varieties in Tanzania.

Abstract

If dryland legumes are to meet the expectations of reducing poverty and hunger in the semi-Arid Tropics, there will be need for a full understanding of their potential for diffusion and the barriers to adoption. We apply a program evaluation technique to data obtained from Tanzania to derive estimates of the actual and potential adoption rates of improved pigeonpea varieties and their determinants. The study reveals that only 33% of the sampled farmers were aware of the improved pigeonpea varieties which consequently restricted the sample adoption rate of improved varieties to only 19%. The potential adoption rate of improved pigeonpea if all farmers had been exposed to improved varieties is estimated at 62% and the adoption gap resulting from the incomplete exposure of the population to the improved pigeonpea is 43%. We further find that the awareness of improved varieties is mainly influenced by attendance of Participatory Variety Selection activities. The adoption of improved varieties is more pronounced among farmers with smaller landholdings suggesting that farmers facing land pressure intensify pigeonpea production through the adoption of improved high yielding varieties. The findings are indicative of the relatively large demand for improved pigeonpea varieties suggesting that there is scope for increasing their adoption rate in Tanzania once the farmers are made aware of the existence of the technologies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: pigeonpea, adoption, average treatment effect, Tanzania
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General

References

References Ashby, J.A., Sperling, L. (1995). "Institutionalizing participatory, client driven research and technology development in agriculture." Development and Change 26, :753-770.

Besley, T., and A. Case. (1993): Modeling technology adoption in developing countries. The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the 105 Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Anaheim, California. pp. 396–402

Conelly, W.T (1993). Agricultural intensification in a Philippine frontier community: Impact on labor efficiency and farm diversity. Human Ecology 20:203–23

Diagne, A. (2006): Diffusion and adoption of NERICA eice varieties in Côte d’Ivoire. The Developing Economies, XLIV-2 (2006) Pp 208-31

Diagne, A. and M. Demont. (2007). Taking a New look at Empirical Models of Adoption: Average Treatment Effect estimation of Adoption rate and its Determinants. Agricultural Economics, Vol 37 (2007). 30p.

Dimara, E. and D. Skuras (2003): Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process. Agricultural Economics. 28: 187-196.

Durosomo, B., 1993. Technology adoption and Sub-Sahara African agriculture: the sustainable development option. Agr. Human Values 10, 58–70.

Feder, G., Just, R.E. and Zilberman, D. (1985), ‘Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33:2, pp.255-298

Foster.A and M. Rosenzweig. (1995). Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Farm household Change in Agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 103(6): 1176-1209

Geroski, P.A. (2000). Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy 29: 603–625

Joshi PK, Parthasarathy Rao P, Gowda CLL, Jones RB, Silim SN, Saxena KB and Kumar J. (2001) The world chickpea and pigeonpea economies: facts, trends, and outlook. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B. and Geoffrey, M. (2011) Agricultural Technology, Crop Income, and Poverty Alleviation in Uganda. World Development, forthcoming.

Kassie, M., Zikhali, P., Manjur, K. and Edwards, S. (2009). Adoption of Organic Farming Techniques: Evidence from a Semi-Arid Region of Ethiopia. Environment for Development, Discussion Paper Series 09-01.

Kibaara, B., J. Ariga, J. Olwande and T.S. Jayne. (2009). Trends in Kenyan Agricultural Productivity: 1997-2007. Nairobi, Kenya: Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development. Working Paper 31/2008.

Kimani, P.M. 2001. Pigeonpea Breeding: Objectives, Experiences, and Strategies for Eastern Africa in Silim, S.N., Mergeai, G. and Kimani, P. M. (eds). 2001. Status and potential of pigeonpea in Eastern and Southern Africa: proceedings of a regional workshop, 12-15 Sep 2000, Nairobi, Kenya. Gembloux, Belgium: Gembloux Agricultural University; and Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 232 pp. ISBN 92-9066-432-0.

Koundouri P., C. Nauges, V. Tzouvelekas, 2006. Technology adoption under production uncertainty: theory and application to irrigation technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3), 657-670

Mergeai, G., Kimani, P., Mwang’ombe, A., Olubayo, F., Smith, C., Audi, P., Baudoin, J. P. and Le Roi, A. 2001. Survey of pigeonpea production systems, utilization and marketing in semi-arid lands of Kenya. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 5 (3): 145–153

Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B., (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 70: 41–55

Rubin D (1974). Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and nonrandomized Studies." Journal of Educational Psychology, 66: 688{701.

Saha, L., L. H. Alan and S. Robert (1994): Adoption of emerging technologies under output uncertainty”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 76: 836-846.

Saka, J. O. and Lawal, B. O. (2009). Determinants of Adoption and Productivity of Improved Rice Varieties in Southwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 8(19): 4923-4932

Saxena, K.B. 2008. Genetic Improvement of Pigeon Pea – A Review. Tropical Plant Biology 1:159-178.

Shiferaw B., Okello J., Muricho G., Omiti J., Silim S. and Jones R. 2008. Unlocking the Potential of High-Value Legumes in the Semi-Arid Regions: Analyses of the Pigeonpea Value Chains in Kenya. Research Report No. 1: Institutions, Markets, Policy Impacts. Nairobi, Kenya: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 52pp.

Shiferaw B., Silim S., Muricho G., Audi, P., Mligo, J., Lyimo, S., You, L., and Christiansen, J.L. 2005. Assessment of the Adoption and Impact of Improved Pigeonpea Varieties in Tanzania. Working Paper Series no. 21: Socioeconomics and Policy. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 36 pp.

Simtowe, F., Mduma, J., Phiri, A., Thomas, A., and M. Zeller. 2006. Can Risk-aversion Towards Fertilizer Explain part of the Non-adoption Puzzle for Hybrid Maize? Empirical Evidence from Malawi. Journal of Applied Sciences 6(7)1490-1498

Wooldrige, J. (2002): Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA