Erdogdu, Erkan (2013): Implications of liberalization policies on government support to R&D: lessons from electricity markets. Published in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 17, No. 1 (January 2013): pp. 110-118.
Download (411kB) | Preview
Since the early 1980s, electricity industry reforms have been initiated in more than half of the countries in the world. Among the primary targets of these reform schemes, there has been an increase in efficiency of the sector; and it is implicitly assumed that government support to energy technology R&D will progress in line with the reform process as the former is required to sustain improved efficiency in the middle and long run. The paper reviews the relation between reform process in electricity markets and government support to energy R&D. Using panel data from 27 countries covering the period from 1974 to 2008, this study aims at finding out to what extent the expected correlation between reform process and government support to energy R&D has in practice been materialized so far. The findings suggest that, contrary to expectations, the progress toward electricity market reform is associated with reduced government support to a variety of energy R&D activities, which threatens sustainable efficiency improvements in the power industry.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Implications of liberalization policies on government support to R&D: lessons from electricity markets|
|English Title:||Implications of liberalization policies on government support to R&D: lessons from electricity markets|
|Keywords:||Economics of Regulation and Liberalization; Research and Development; Government Policy; Electricity Industry; Panel Data Modeling|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy
L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
|Depositing User:||Erkan Erdogdu|
|Date Deposited:||23. Oct 2012 17:13|
|Last Modified:||26. May 2015 13:30|
 Gratwick KN, Eberhard A. Demise of the standard model for power sector reform and the emergence of hybrid power markets. Energy Policy. 2008;36:3948-60.
 Hogan WW. Electricity Market Restructuring: Reforms of Reforms. J Regul Econ. 2002;21:103-32.
 Sioshansi FP. Electricity market reform: What has the experience taught us thus far? Utilities Policy. 2006;14:63-75.
 Dubash NK. Revisiting electricity reform: The case for a sustainable development approach. Utilities Policy. 2003;11:143-54.
 Reddy AKN. Towards a new paradigm for power sector reform in India. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2002;6:22-9.
 Yi-chong X. The myth of the single solution: electricity reforms and the World Bank. Energy. 2006;31:802-14.
 Williams JH, Ghanadan R. Electricity reform in developing and transition countries: A reappraisal. Energy. 2006;31:815-44.
 Jamasb T, Newbery D, Pollitt M. Core Indicators for Determinants and Performance of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. 2004;CWPE 0438.
 Dooley JJ. Unintended consequences: energy R&D in a deregulated energy market. Energy Policy. 1998;26:547-55.
 Aggarwal A. Deregulation, technology imports and in-house R&D efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience. Research Policy. 2000;29:1081-93.
 Calderini M, Garrone P. Liberalisation, industry turmoil and the balance of R&D activities. Information Economics and Policy. 2001;13:199-230.
 Katrak H. Does economic liberalisation endanger indigenous technological developments?: An analysis of the Indian experience. Research Policy. 2002;31:19-30.
 Bowonder B, Satish NG. Is economic liberalisation stimulating innovation in India? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2003;28:44-53.
 Runci PJ, Dooley JJ. Research and Development Trends for Energy. In: Cutler JC, editor. Encyclopedia of Energy. New York: Elsevier; 2004. p. 443-9.
 Jamasb T, Nuttall WJ, Pollitt M. The case for a new energy research, development and promotion policy for the UK. Energy Policy. 2008;36:4610-4.
 Jamasb T, Pollitt M. Liberalisation and R&D in network industries: The case of the electricity industry. Research Policy. 2008;37:995-1008.
 IEA. Energy Technology Research and Development (Edition: 2009), RD&D Budgets. Paris/France: International Energy Agency; 2010.
 IEA. Energy Balances of OECD Countries (2010 edition). Paris/France: International Energy Agency; 2010.
 CIC. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices (CIC), University of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania, USA2010.
 World Bank. World Development Indicators (Edition: April 2010). 2010.