Fairley, Kim and Sanfey, Alan and Vyrastekova, Jana and Weitzel, Utz (2012): Social risk and ambiguity in the trust game.
Download (454kB) | Preview
Despite intensive research there is no clear evidence for a link between lottery risk preferences and risk involved in trusting others. We argue that this is partially due to a misalignment of the underlying sources of risk. Trusting is giving up control to a human source of risk while lottery risk has a mechanistic source. We propose a risky trust game that experimentally elicits social risk preferences that pertain to the same underlying human source. Our results show that transfers in the classic trust game are indeed best explained by social risk preferences and not by lottery risk preferences with an underlying mechanistic source. In addition, we argue that the type of uncertainty also plays a role. In the absence of objectively known probabilities of trustworthiness, trust also has an ambiguous component. We therefore decompose uncertainty in the trust game into social risk and an ambiguous component. Our results provide evidence that, when accounting for social risk, subjects who score high on ambiguity tolerance explain some of the remainder of trusting behavior.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Social risk and ambiguity in the trust game|
|Keywords:||Trust; trust game; decision making under uncertainty; risk; ambiguity; source of uncertainty|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
|Depositing User:||Kim Fairley|
|Date Deposited:||30. Oct 2012 00:28|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 15:24|
- Abdellaoui, M., A. Baillon, L. Placido and P. Wakker (2011). “The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation”, American Economic Review, 101 (2), p. 695-723.
- Aimone, J.A. and D. Houser (2012). “What you don’t know won’t hurt you: a laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion”, Experimental Economics, p. 1–18 Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9314-z. doi: 10.1007/s10683-012-9314-z.
- Andreoni, J., and J. Miller (2002). “Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism”, Econometrica, 70, p. 737–753.
- Ashraf, N., I. Bohnet and N. Piankov (2006). “Decomposing trust and trustworthiness“, Experimental Economics, 9 (3), p. 193-208.
- Bardsley, N. (2000). “Control without deception: Individual behaviour in free-riding experiments revisited”, Experimental Economics, 3 (3), p. 215-240.
- Ben-Ner, A. and F. Halldorsson (2010). “Trusting and trustworthiness: what are they, how to measure them, and what affects them”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, p. 64-79.
- Berg, J., J. Dickhaut and K. McCabe (1995). “Trust, reciprocity, and social history”, Games and Economic Behavior, 10 (1), p. 122–142.
- Bicchieri, C., E. Xiao, and R. Muldoon (2011). “Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10 (2), p. 170-187.
- Bohnet, I. and R. Zeckhauser (2004). “Trust, risk and betrayal”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, p. 467-484.
- Budner, S. (1962). “Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable”, Journal of Personality, 30 (1), p. 29-50.
- Cabantous, L. (2007). “Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance. Insurers’ attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates”, Theory and Decision, 62, p. 219-240.
- Camerer, C. and M. Weber (1992). “Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, p. 325-370.
- Casari, T. and M. N. Cason (2009). “The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior”, Economic Letters, 103, p. 157–159.
- Corcos, A., Pannequin, F., and Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2012). “Is trust an ambiguous rather than a risky decision?” Economics Bulletin, 32 (3), p. 2255-2266.
- Cox, J. J. (2004). “How to identify trust and reciprocity”, Games and Economic Behavior, 46, p. 260-281.
- Curley, S. P., F. Yates, and R. A. Abrams (1986). “Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, p. 230-256.
- Dollinger, M. (1983). “Use of Budner’s intolerance of ambiguity measure for entrepreneurial research”, Psychological Report, 53, p. 1019-1021.
- Dufwenberer, M. and U. Gneezy (2000). “Measuring belief in an experimental lost wallet game”, Games and Economic Behavior, 30, p. 163-182.
- Eckel, C. C. and R. K. Wilson (2004). “Is trust a risky decision?”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, p. 447-465.
- Ellsberg, Daniel. (1961). "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, p. 643-669.
- Etang, A., D. Fielding and S. Knowles (2011). “Does trust extend beyond the village? Experimental trust and social distance in Cameroon”, Experimental Economics, 14, p. 15-35.
- Fischbacher, U. (2007). “z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments”, Experimental Economics, 10 (2), p. 171-178.
- Fox, C.R. and A. Tversky (1995). “Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), p. 585-603.
- Ghosh, D. and M. Ray (1997). “Risk, ambiguity and decision choice: some additional evidence”, Decision Sciences, 28 (1), p. 81-104.
- Gneezy, U., W. Güth and F. Verboven (2000). “Presents or investments? An experimental analysis”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, p. 481–493.
- Heath, C. and A. Tversky (1991). “Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4 (1), p. 5-28.
- Hogarth, T. M. and M. Villeval (2010). “Intermittent reinforcement and the persistence of behavior: Experimental evidence”, Groupe d’Analyse et de Théorie Économique, Working Paper, No. 1018.
- Holt, C. and S. K. Laury (2002). “Risk aversion and incentive effects”, American Economic Review, 92 (5), p. 1644-1655.
- Houser, D., D. Schunk and J. Winter (2010). “Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 74, p. 72-81.
- Hsu, M., M. Bhatt, R. Adolphs, D. Tranel and C. Camerer (2005). “Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making”, Science, 310, p. 1680-1683.
- Huettel, S. A., C. J. Stowe, E. M. Gordon, B. T. Warner and M. L. Platt (2006). “Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity”, Neuron, 49, p. 765-775.
- Johnson, N. D. and A. A. Mislin (2011). “Trust games: A meta-Analysis”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (5), p. 865-889.
- Jonckheere, A.R. (1954). “A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives”, Biometrika, 41, p. 133–145.
- Kanagaretnam, K., S. Mestelman, K. Nainar and M. Shehata (2009). “The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocity”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, p. 368-380.
- Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit, Houghton Mifflin, New York.
- Kosfeld, M., M. Heinrichs, P.J. Zak, U. Fischbacher and E. Fehr (2005).”Oxytocin increases trust in humans”, Nature, 435, p. 673–676.
- Liebrand, W. B.G. (1984). “The effect of social motives, communication and group sizes on behavior in an n-person multi stage mixed motive game”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, p. 239-264.
- Noteboom, B. (2007). “Social capital, institutions and trust”, Review of Social Economy, 65, p. 29-53.
- Offerman, T., J. Sonnemans, and A. Schram (1996). “Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods,” Economic Journal, 106, p. 817-845.
- Ortmann, A., J. Fitzgerald and C. Boeing (2000). “Trust, reciprocity and social history: A Re-examination”, Experimental Economics, 3, p. 81-100.
- Phelps, E. A. (2006). “Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala”, Annual Review Psychology, 57, p. 27-53.
- Sherman, R. (1974). “The psychological difference between ambiguity and risk”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88, p. 166-169.
- Taylor, K. A. (1995). “Testing credit and blame attributions as explanation for choices under ambiguity,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), p. 128–137.
- Trautmann S.T., F.M. Vieider and P.P. Wakker (2008). “Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, p. 225-243.
- Vyrastekova, J. and S. Garikipati (2005). “Beliefs and trust: an experiment”, CentER discussion paper.
- Wakker, P.P. (2008). “Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family”, Health Economics, 17, p.1329-1344.
- Wakker, P.P. (2010). Prospect theory for risk and ambiguity, Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Yamagischi T., M. Kikuchi and M. Kosugi (1999). “Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2 (1), p. 145-161.
- Yamagishi, T. and M. Yamagishi (1994). “Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan”, Motivation and Emotion, 18, p. 126-166.
- Zand, D (1972). “Trust and managerial solving”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (2), p. 229-239.
Available Versions of this Item
- Social risk and ambiguity in the trust game. (deposited 30. Oct 2012 00:28) [Currently Displayed]