Sokolovska, Olena and Sokolovskyi, Dmytro (2011): The effect of tax-tariff reform: evidence from Ukraine.
Download (826Kb) | Preview
The paper examines the tax-tariff reform, recommended for Ukraine by donor organization (IMF and the World Bank), which consists in trade liberalization by way of trade tax cuts with simultaneous compensation of state tax revenue losses by VAT base broadening. We developed the mathematical model of evaluation of crossborder taxation influence on commodity flows, on economic agents’ profits and on state tax revenues, which can be considered as extension of “Devarajan” and “Emran–Stiglitz” models, with regard to possibility of tax evasion and receiving the illegally compensated VAT. The evaluation of model using data bases, prepared by Ukrainian State Statistic Committee and Customs administration of Ukraine, revealed that the expediency to reform a tax-tariff system, according to the IMF recommendations, is not clearly obvious and it depends on tax rates elasticity of size of informal sector. We find that providing the trade liberalization by way of substitution of trade tax revenues by enlarged VAT is expedient in those branches of economy, which are characterized by monopoly and oligopoly situation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The effect of tax-tariff reform: evidence from Ukraine|
|Keywords:||trade tax, tax-tariff reform, VAT, informal sector|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables > C30 - General
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion
|Depositing User:||Olena Sokolovska|
|Date Deposited:||18. Nov 2012 13:49|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 17:08|
1. Boadway R., and M. Sato (2008): Optimal Tax Design and Enforcement with an Informal Sector, Queen’s Economics Department Working Paper No.1168.
2. Devarajan S., D. Go, and H. Li (1999): Quantifying the Fiscal Effects of Trade Reform, The World Bank Working Paper Revised.
3. Elborgh-Woytek K., P. Lankes, A. Sadikov, D. Smith, and J.-J. Hallaert (2006): Fiscal implications of multilateral tariff cuts, IMF Working Paper No203.
4. Keen M. (2007): VAT, Tariffs, and Withholding: Border Taxes and Informality in Developing Countries, IMF Working Paper, WP/07/17.
5. Keen M., and T. Baunsgaard (2005): Tax Revenue and (or?) Trade Liberalization, IMF WP/05/112.
6. Keen М. and J.E Ligthart (2004): Coordinating Tariff Reduction and Domestic Tax Reform under Imperfect Competition, CentER Discussion Paper No 2004-78.
7. Kuchta-Helbling С., J.D. Sullivan and J. Zemko (2000): The Informal Sector in Emerging Democracies, Center for International Private Enterprise.
8. Ligthart J., and G. van der Meijden (2010): Coordinated Tax-Tariff Reforms, Informality, and Welfare Distribution, CESifo Working Paper No. 3107.
9. Loayza N.V. (1996): Тhe economics of the informal sector: A Simple Model and Some Empirical Evidence from Latin America // The World Bank, Washington, D.C. 20433.
10. Lorie H. (2003): Priorities for Further Fiscal Reforms in the Commonwealth of Independent States, IMF WP/03/209.
Lorie H. (2003): Priorities for further fiscal reforms in the Commonwealth of Independent States / IMF Working Paper No03/209.
12. Munk K.J.(2008): Tax-tariff reform with costs of tax administration, International Tax and Public Finance, 15,6, 647-667.
13. Pigott J. and J. Whalley (1999): VAT Base Broadening, Self Supply, and the Informal Sector, American Economic Review, 91, No4, 1084-1094.
14. Schneider F. (1994): Can the Shadow Economy be Reduced Through Major Tax Reforms? An Empirical Investigation for Austria, Supplement to Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 49, 137-152.
15. Schneider F., and D. Enste (2000): Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences, Journal of economic literature, Vol. xxxviii, 77-114.
16. Schneider F., and D. Enste (2000): Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences, Journal of economic literature, 38, 77-114.
17. Schneider F., and R. Klinglmair (2004): Shadow economies around the world: what do we know?, European Public Choice Society Annual Meeting, Berlin.
18. Schneider F., and R. Klinglmair (2004): Shadow economies around the world: what do we know, European Public Choice Society Annual Meeting.
19. Shahe Emran M., and J.E. Stiglitz (2004): Price-Neutral Tax Reform With an Informal Economy, Econometric Society, North American Summer Meetings, Paper No. 493.
20. Shahe Emran M., and J.E. Stiglitz (2005): On selective indirect tax reform in developing countries, Journal of Public Economics, 89, 599-623.
21. Shahe Emran M., and J.E. Stiglitz (2007): Equity and Efficiency in Tax Reform in Developing Countries, George Washington University.
22. Stiglitz J. (1998): More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the post-Washington consensus http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/stig.htm.
23. Tarr D. (2000): On the design of tariff policy: a practical guide to the arguments for and against uniform tariffs, The World Bank.
24. Ukraine: 2005 Article IV Consultation and Ex Post Assessment of Longer-Term Program Engagement - Staff Reports; Staff Supplement; and Public Information, IMF Country Report No. 05/415.
25. Ukraine: First Review under the Stand-By Arrangement – Staff Report (2011), IMF Country Report No. 11/52.
26. Vishnevskyy V., and O. Luk’yanenko (2006): Possible consequences ofexport duty cuts in the framework of Ukraine joining to WTO Vozmojnie posledstviya sokrachenia ekspornikh poshlin v ramkakh prisoedineniya Ukraini k WTO // Налогообложение: проблемы науки и практики: Монография. – Х.:ИД «ИНЖЭК».
27. World economic outlook (2012), International Monetary Fund.