Collan, Mikael (2007): Lazy User Behaviour.
Download (39kB) | Preview
In this position paper we suggest that a user will most often choose the solution (device) that will fulfill her (information) needs with the least effort. We call this “lazy user behavior”. We suggest that the principle components responsible for solution selection are the user need and the user state. User need is the user’s detailed (information) need (urgency, type, depth, etc.) and user state is the situation, in which the user is at the moment of the need (location, time, etc.); the user state limits the set of available solutions (devices) to fulfill the user need. The context of this paper is the use of mobile devices and mobile services. We present the lazy user theory of solution selection, two case examples, and discuss the implications of lazy user behavior on user attachment to mobile services and devices, and to planning and execution of mobile services.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Lazy User Behaviour|
|Keywords:||User Attachment; Lazy User; Mobile Services; Mobile Devices; Adoption; Acceptance; Least Effort|
|Subjects:||Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y8 - Related Disciplines > Y80 - Related Disciplines
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M2 - Business Economics > M29 - Other
|Depositing User:||Mikael Collan|
|Date Deposited:||12. Mar 2008 15:04|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 09:23|
1. Davis, F.D., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989. 13(3): p. 319-340. 2. Bagozzi, R.P., F.D. Davis, and P.R. Warshaw, Development and Test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 1992. 45(7): p. 660-686. 3. Venkatesh, V., et al., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 2003. 27(3): p. 425-478. 4. Goodhue, D.L., Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 1995. 41(12): p. 1827-1844. 5. Goodhue, D.L. and R.L. Thompson, Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 1995. 19(2): p. 213-236. 6. Vessey, I., Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature. Decision Sciences, 1991. 22(2): p. 219-240. 7. Vessey, I. and D.F. Galletta, Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition. Information Systems Research, 1991. 2(1): p. 63-84. 8. Zipf, G.K., Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. 1949: Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, USA. 9. Ferrer i Cancho, R. and R.V. Solé, Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. 100(7): p. 788-791. 10. Mann, T., A Guide to Library Research Methods. 1987, USA: Oxford University Press. 224. 11. Team, T.L. Lazy Users and Automatic Video Retrieval Tools in (the) Lowlands. in 10th Text Retrieval Conference, TREC. 2001. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA. 12. Chu, D., et al. UVa Bus.NET: Enhancing User Experiences on Smart Devices through Context-Aware Computing. in 2004 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. 2004. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 13. Raghavan, R., O. Madani, and R. Jones. InterActive Feature Selection. in 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2005. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 14. Franks, J. and O. Sussman, Financial Distress and Bank Restructuring of Small to Medium Size UK Companies. Review of Finance, 2005. 9(1): p. 65-96. 15. Ikoja-Odongo, R. and J. Mostert, Information seeking behaviour: A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Library & Information Science 2006. 72(3): p. 145-158. 16. Collan, M., et al., Using E- and M-Business Components in Business: Approaches, Cases, and Rules of Thumb, in Entrepreneurship and Innovations in E-Business - an Integrative Perspective, F. Zhao, Editor. 2006, Idea Group Publishing: Hershey. p. 159-178.