Manufacturing employment, productivity and the business cycle

Tatom, John (2004): Manufacturing employment, productivity and the business cycle. Published in: Tax Foundation Background Paper , Vol. No.. 4, (1 February 2004): pp. 1-16.

Abstract

The U.S. manufacturing sector has become the poster child of the jobless recovery, the latest victim of the Bubble Economy. On Labor Day 2003 President Bush called for the creation of a new position of Assistant Secretary for Manufacturing in the Department of Commerce. The National Association of Manufacturers has called for a new strategy for renewal of U.S. manufacturing, referring to the sector as being in “jeopardy.” Congress is even considering legislation, such as the American Jobs Creation Act (H.R. 2896), that would lower the corporate income tax rate for the nation’s manufacturing sector. Secretary of Treasury Snow has succeeded in reversing long-standing U.S. exchange rate policy, calling for “flexibility” of Chinese and Japanese exchange rates. But the focus is on two countries where he believes that flexibility would lead to a lower value of the dollar (and not, for example, Hong Kong, where it would not). The new U.S. policy has succeeded in pushing down the dollar sharply against nearly all our major trading partners, the true objective of the policy. The political and economic policy situation is becoming critical. In the 1980s, the “deindustrialization” of America and the hollowing out of the American corporation threatened to turn us in to a nation of hamburger flippers and promised a Day of Reckoning. The irony was that manufacturing and the economy as a whole were enjoying a surge of policy-induced economic growth that had not been seen for two decades and that was restoring some faith in the continuing promise of the American Dream. Pundits are always looking for a new whipping boy symbolize US economic decline. In the mid-1980s it was the "deindustrialization" of America reflected in the massive current account deficit. But this time things could get nastier. A large current account deficit is back and has remained in the face of another jobless recovery, i.e., an economic expansion without a recovery in employment. And the decline in overall employment is heavily concentrated in manufacturing sector job losses. A more patient and optimistic perspective could be offered by reflecting on the euphoria of the new economy with its rapid productivity growth, advances that appear to be continuing. But instead, memories of recent boom times have apparently simply reinforced concerns about the demise of US manufacturing. As a result, the rhetoric of industrial decline and political intervention to protect industry and jobs is growing. Has there been a structural shift in the U.S. economy that has doomed the manufacturing sector? Are government policies necessary for renewal? This paper attempts to provide some perspective on the decline in manufacturing employment and whether it represents a fundamental structural shift that requires public policy assistance to halt and/or reverse. It also assesses some potential policy efforts to aid the sector and the outlook for manufacturing employment.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Networks Financial Institute at Indiana State University
• Language: English
• Keywords: Manufacturing employment; productivity growth; business cycle
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

US Bureau of Labor Statistics, “International Comparisons of Manufacturing Productivity and Unit Labor Cost Trends, 2002,” September 9, 2003. Caplow, Theodore, Louis Hicks, and Ben J. Wattenberg, The First Measured Century, American Enterprise Institute Press, 2001. Carson, Joseph, “Manufacturing Payrolls Declining Globally,” Alliance Capital Management L.P., October 2003. Cline, R., “Pressure for Import Protection and US Policy,” in United States Trade and Competitiveness, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, US House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Serial No. 99-46, pp. 454-69 (1986). Duesterberg, Thomas J., “U.S. future needs blue-collar might; So, who cares if manufacturing falters or moves abroad? Americans should, because it is imperative for innovation, national defense and jobs.” Chicago Tribune, August 24, 2003. Glick, R. and Hutchison, M., “Does Exchange Rate Appreciation, ‘Deindustrialize’ The Open Economy? A Critique of US Evidence,” Economic Inquiry 28, (1990), pp. 19-37. National Association of Manufacturers, “The NAM’s Strategy for Growth and Manufacturing Renewal,” adopted by the Board of Directors on Feb. 8 2003, www.nam.org. Lawrence, R. Z., “Is Trade Deindustrializing America? A Medium-Term Perspective,” Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 1, (1983), pp. 129-61. __________, “Can America Compete?” (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution), (1984). Marris, S., “Deficits and the Dollar: The World Economy at Risk,” Policy Analyses in International Economics, 14, (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, December 1985). Peterson, P. G., “The Morning After,” The Atlantic Monthly, (October 1987), pp.43-69. Strauss, William, and Walster, Scott, “The Disappearance of Manufacturing?” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago Fed Letter, No. 100 (June 2003). Tatom, John A., "Why Has Manufacturing Employment Declined?" Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (December 1986), pp. 15-25. __________, "Will A Weaker Dollar Mean A Stronger Economy?" Journal of International Money and Finance (December 1987), pp. 433-47. __________,"The Link Between The Value of the Dollar, U.S. Trade and Manufacturing Output: Some Recent Evidence," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (November/December 1988), pp. 24-37. __________, “Currency Appreciation and ‘Deindustrialisation’: A European Perspective,” The World Economy (July 1995), pp. 519-541.