Green, Kesten C. and Armstrong, J. Scott (2007): Global warming: Forecasts by scientists versus scientific forecasts.
Download (278kB) | Preview
In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Working Group One, a panel of experts established by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme, issued its Fourth Assessment Report. The Report included predictions of dramatic increases in average world temperatures over the next 92 years and serious harm resulting from the predicted temperature increases. Using forecasting principles as our guide we asked: Are these forecasts a good basis for developing public policy? Our answer is “no.” To provide forecasts of climate change that are useful for policy-making, one would need to forecast (1) global temperature, (2) the effects of any temperature changes, (3) the effects of alternative policies, and (4) whether the best policy would be successfully implemented. Proper forecasts of all four are necessary for rational policy making. The IPCC Report was regarded as providing the most credible long-term forecasts of global average temperatures by 31 of the 51 scientists and others involved in forecasting climate change who responded to our survey. We found no references to the primary sources of information on forecasting methods despite the fact these are easily available in books, articles, and websites. We audited the forecasting processes described in Chapter 8 of the IPCC’s WG1 Report to assess the extent to which they complied with forecasting principles. We found enough information to make judgments on 89 out of a total of 140 forecasting principles. The forecasting procedures that were described violated 72 principles. Many of the violations were, by themselves, critical. The forecasts in the Report were not the outcome of scientific procedures. In effect, they were the opinions of scientists transformed by mathematics and obscured by complex writing. Research on forecasting has shown that experts’ predictions are not useful. We have been unable to identify any scientific forecasts of global warming. Claims that the Earth will get warmer have no more credence than saying that it will get colder.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Global warming: Forecasts by scientists versus scientific forecasts|
|Keywords:||accuracy; audit; climate change; evaluation; expert judgment; mathematical models; public policy|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods; Simulation Methods
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
|Depositing User:||Kesten Green|
|Date Deposited:||07. Aug 2007|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 08:15|
Allen, P.G. and Fildes, R. (2001). Econometric Forecasting in Armstrong, J.S. ed. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer. Anderson, R.W. and Gainor, D. (2006). Fire and Ice: Journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years, but can’t decide weather we face an ice age or warming. Business and Media Institute, May 17. Available at http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/FireandIce.pdf Armstrong, J.S. (1980). The Seer-sucker theory: The value of experts in forecasting. Technology Review 83 (June-July), 16-24. Armstrong, J.S. (1978; 1985). Long-Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Armstrong, J.S. (1999). Forecasting for environmental decision-making, in Dale, V.H. and English, M.E. eds., Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making. New York: Springer-Verlag, 192-225. Armstrong, J.S. (2001). Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Armstrong, J.S. (2006). Findings from evidence-based forecasting: Methods for reducing forecast error. International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 583-598. Ascher W. (1978). Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy Makers and Planners. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Bast, J. and Taylor, J.M. (2007). Scientific consensus on global warming. The Heartland Institute: Chicago, Illinois. Available http://downloads.heartland.org/20861.pdf. [The responses to all questions in the 1996 and 2003 surveys by Brat and von Storch are included as an appendix.] Bellamy, D. and Barrett, J. (2007). Climate stability: an inconvenient proof. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Civil Engineering, 160, 66-72. Carter, R.M. (2007). The myth of dangerous human-caused climate change. The Aus/MM New Leaders Conference, Brisbane May 3, 2007. Full text available from http://members.iinet.net.au/~glrmc/new_page_1.htm Carter, R.M., de Freitas, C.R., Goklany, I.M., Holland, D. and Linzen, R.S. (2006). The Stern review: A dual critique: Part 1. World Economics, 7, 167-198. Cerf, C. and Navasky, V. (1998). The Experts Speak. New York: Pantheon. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Craig, P.P., Gadgil, A., and Koomey, J.G. (2002). What Can History Teach Us? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27, 83-118. Duncan, G. T., Gorr W. L. and Szczypula, J. (2001). Forecasting Analogous Time Series, in Armstrong, J.S. ed. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer. Eccleston, P. (2007). Public ‘in denial’ about climate change. telegraph.co.uk, 12:01 BST 03/07/2007. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml;jse...MGSFFOAVCBQWIV0?xml=/earth/2007/07/03/eawarm103.xml&site=30&page=0 Essex, C., McKitrick, R. and Andresen, B. (2007). Does a global temperature exist? Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 32, 1-27. Working paper available at http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/globaltemp/globaltemp.html Essex, C. and McKitrick, R. (2002). Taken by Storm. The Troubled Science, Policy & Politics of Global Warming, Toronto: Key Porter Books. 14 Hegerl, G.C., F. W. Zwiers, P. Braconnot, N.P. Gillett, Y. Luo, J.A. Marengo Orsini, N. Nicholls, J.E. Penner and P.A. Stott (2007). Understanding and Attributing Climate Change, in Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Jaworowski, Z. (2007). CO2: The greatest scientific scandal of our time. Executive Intelligence Review, 34(11), 38-53. Available at http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/zjmar07.pdf Keepin, B. and Wynne, B. (1984). Technical analysis of IIASA energy scenarios. Nature, 312, 691-695. Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S.C., and Hyndman, R.J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and Applications (3rd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. NDU (1978). Climate Change to the Year 2000. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University. New Zealand Climate Science Coalition (2007). World climate predictors right only half the time. Media release 7 June. Available at http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC0706/S00026.htm Pilkey, O.H. and Pilkey-Jarvis, L. (2007). Useless Arithmetic Why Environmental Scientists Can’t predict the Future. New York: Columbia University Press. Randall, D.A., Wood, R.A., Bony, S., Colman, R., Fichefet, T., Fyfe, J., Kattsov, V., Pitman, A., Shukla, J., Srinivasan, J., Stouffer, R. J., Sumi, A. and Taylor, K.E. (2007). Climate Models and Their Evaluation, in Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H.L. eds., Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Schnaars, S.P. and Bavuso, R.J. (1986). Extrapolation models on very short-term forecasts. Journal of Business Research, 14, 27-36. Stainforth, D.A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame, D.J., Kettleborough, J.A., Knight, S., Martin, A., Murphy, J.M., Piani, C., Sexton, D., Smith, L.A., Spicer, R.A., Thorpe, A.J. and Allen, M.R. (2005). Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases, Nature, 433, 403-406. Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available from http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm Stewart, T.R. and Glantz, M.H. (1985). Expert judgment and climate forecasting: A methodological critique of ‘Climate Change to the Year 2000’. Climate Change, 7, 159-183. Stott, P.A. and Kettleborough, J.A. (2002). Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise, Nature, 416, 723-726. Taylor, M. (2007). An evaluation of NIWA’s climate predictions for May 2002 to April 2007. Climate Science Coalition. Available at http://www.climatescience.org.nz/assets/2007691051580.ClimateUpdateEvaluationText.pdf Data available at http://www.climatescience.org.nz/assets/2007691059100.ClimateUpdateEvaluationCalc.xls.pdf Tetlock, P.E. (2005). Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Trenberth, K.E. (2007). Predictions of climate. Climate Feedback: The Climate Change Blog, Nature.com, June 4. Available at http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/06/predictions_of_climate.html Vizard, A.L., Anderson, G.A., and Buckley, D.J. (2005). Verification and value of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology township seasonal rainfall forecasts in Australia, 1997-2005. Meteorological Applications, 12, 343-355. 15 Wittink D., and Bergestuen T. (2001). Forecasting with Conjoint Analysis, in Armstrong, J.S. ed. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.