Framed field experiments with heterogeneous frame connotation

Ansink, Erik and Bouma, Jetske (2013): Framed field experiments with heterogeneous frame connotation.

Abstract

We study label framing effects in linear public goods games. By accounting for heterogeneous frame connotation, we can identify individual framing effects. We test for such effects in a field experiment on irrigation management in India. Using membership of the water users association as a proxy for frame connotation, we find a differential impact on contributions in the game. Members contribute relatively more under the irrigation frame than non-members as compared to an alternative, neutral, frame. We conclude that experimental behaviour is sensitive to framing at the individual level but that such individual effects may cancel out on average, which explains previous studies that find mixed or only weak effects of framing.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Framing effects; field experiment; public goods game; frame connotation; irrigation management
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments

References

Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: The effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(1), 1–21.

Bacharach, M. and M. Bernasconi (1997). The variable frame theory of focal points: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 19(1), 1–45.

Bolton, G. and A. Ockenfels (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90(1), 166–193.

Bouma, J. and E. Ansink (2013). The role of legitimacy perceptions in self-restricted resource use: A framed field experiment. Forthcoming in Forest Policy and Economics.

Bouma, J., K. Joy, S. Paranjape, and E. Ansink (2013). Legitimacy and cooperation: A framed field experiment. Mimeo, IVM, VU University Amsterdam.

Brandts, J. and C. Schwieren (2009). Frames and economic behavior: An experimental study. Mimeo, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Buckley, E. and R. Croson (2006). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods. Journal of Public Economics 90(4), 935–955.

Cardenas, J. (2003). Real wealth and experimental cooperation: Experiments in the field lab. Journal of Development Economics 70(2), 263–289.

Carpenter, J. and J. Cardenas (2011). An intercultural examination of cooperation in the commons. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(4), 632–651.

Cherry, T., S. Kroll, and J. Shogren (2005). The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57(3), 357–365.

Cookson, R. (2000). Framing effects in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics 3(1), 55–79.

Croson, R. (2007). Theories of commitment, altruism and reciprocity: Evidence from linear public goods games. Economic Inquiry 45(2), 199–216.

Cubitt, R., M. Drouvelis, and S. Gächter (2011). Framing and free riding: Emotional responses and punishment in social dilemma games. Experimental Economics 14(2), 254–272.

Dreber, A., T. Ellingsen, M. Johannesson, and D. Rand (2013). Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games. Forthcoming in Experimental Economics.

Dufwenberg, M., S. Gächter, and H. Hennig-Schmidt (2011). The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games and Economic Behavior 73(2), 459–478.

Ellingsen, T., M. Johannesson, J. Mollerstrom, and S. Munkhammar (2012). Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs? Games and Economic Behavior 76(1), 117–130.

Elliott, C., D. Hayward, and S. Canon (1998). Institutional framing: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35(4), 455–464.

Fehr, E. and S. Gächter (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90(4), 980–994.

Harrison, G. and J. List (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature 42(4), 1009–1055. Hayo, B. and B. Vollan (2012). Group interaction, heterogeneity, rules, and co-operative behaviour: Evidence from a common-pool resource experiment in South Africa and Namibia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 81(1), 9–28.

Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, H. Gintis, R. McElreath, M. Alvard, A. Barr, J. Ensminger, N. Henrich, K. Hill, F. Gil-White, M. Gurven, F. Marlowe, J. Patton, and D. Tracer (2005). ‘Economic man’ in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6), 795–815.

Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39(4), 341–350.

Levin, I., S. Schneider, and G. Gaeth (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(2), 149–188.

Levitt, S. and J. List (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2), 153–174.

Liberman, V., S. Samuels, and L. Ross (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(9), 1175–1185.

Merrett, D. (2012). Estimation of public goods game data. Economics Working Paper Series 2012-9, University of Sydney.

Messer, K., J. Suter, and J. Yan (2013). Context effects in a negatively framed social dilemma experiment. Forthcoming in Environmental and Resource Economics.

Messer, K., H. Zarghamee, H. Kaiser, and W. Schulze (2007). New hope for the voluntary contributions mechanism: The effects of context. Journal of Public Economics 91(9), 1783–1799.

Park, E. (2000). Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: A further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 43(4), 405–421.

Rege, M. and K. Telle (2004). The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. Journal of Public Economics 88(7), 1625–1644.

Reuben, E. and A. Riedl (2013). Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations. Games and Economic Behavior 77(1), 122–137.

Salant, Y. and A. Rubinstein (2008). (A, f ): Choice with frames. Review of Economic Studies 75(4), 1287–1296.

Voors, M., E. Bulte, A. Kontoleon, J. List, and T. Turley (2011). Using artefactual field experiments to learn about the incentives for sustainable forest use in developing economies. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 101(3), 329–333.