Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment

Attema, Arthur and Brouwer, Werner and l'Haridon, Olivier (2013): Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment.

Abstract

It is well-known that expected utility (EU) has empirical deficiencies. Prospect theory (PT) has developed as an alternative with more descriptive validity. However, PT’s full function had not yet been quantified in the health domain. This paper is the first to simultaneously measure utility of life duration, probability weighting, and loss aversion for health. We observe loss aversion and risk aversion, which for gains can be explained by probabilistic pessimism. Utility for gains is almost linear. For losses, we find less weighting of probability 1/2 and concave utility. This contrasts with the common finding of convex utility for monetary losses. However, PT was proposed to explain choices among lotteries involving small outcomes. Life years are arguably not ‘small’ and need not generate convex utility for losses. Moreover, utility of life duration reflects discounting, causing concave utility. These results are a first step in fitting non-EU models for health-related decisions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Loss aversion, Prospect theory, QALY model, Utility of life duration
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I10 - General

References

-Abdellaoui M. Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions. Management Science 2000;46; 1497-1512.

-Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L'Haridon O. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2008;36; 245-266.

-Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C. Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement. Management Science 2007;53; 1659-1674.

-Abdellaoui M, Diecidue E, Öncüler A. Risk Preferences at Different Time Periods: An Experimental Investigation. Management Science 2011a;57; 975-987.

-Abdellaoui M, L'Haridon O, Paraschiv C. Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications? Management Science 2011b;57; 1879-1895.

-Abellán-Perpinán JM, Bleichrodt H, Pinto-Prades JL. The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement. Journal of Health Economics 2009b;28; 1039-1047.

-Abellán-Perpinán JM, Pinto JL, Méndez-Martinez I, Badia-Llach X. Towards a better QALY model. Health Economics 2006;15; 665-676. -Abellán-Perpinán, J.M., Sánchez-Martínez, F.I., Martínez-Pérez, J.E., Méndez-Martínez, I. 2009a. Debiasing EQ-5D tariffs. new estimations of the spanish EQ-5D value set under nonexpected utility.

-Attema AE. Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2012;63; 1388-1399.

-Attema AE, Bleichrodt H, Wakker PP. A direct method for measuring discounting and QALYs more easily and reliably. Medical Decision Making 2012;32; 583-593.

-Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method. Journal of Health Economics 2009;28; 234-243.

-Attema AE, Brouwer WBF. The way that you do it? An elaborate test of procedural invariance of TTO, using a choice-based design. The European Journal of Health Economics 2012;13; 491-500.

-Bleichrodt H, Abellan-Perpiñan JM, Pinto-Prades JL, Mendez-Martinez I. Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility. Management Science 2007;53; 469-482.

-Bleichrodt H, Johannesson M. Time Preference for Health: A Test of Stationarity versus Decreasing Timing Aversion. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2001;45; 265-282.

-Bleichrodt H, Miyamoto J. A Characterization of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Under Cumulative Prospect Theory. Mathematics of Operations Research 2003;28; 181-193.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis. Management Science 2000;46; 1485-1496.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2002;46; 315-337.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL. The validity of QALYs under non-expected utility. The Economic Journal 2005;115; 533-550.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Abellán-Perpinán JM. A consistency test of the time trade-off. Journal of Health Economics 2003;22; 1037-1052.

-Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Wakker PP. Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility. Management Science 2001;47; 1498-1514.

-Bleichrodt H, Quiggin J. Characterizing QALYs under a General Rank Dependent Utility Model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1997;15; 151-165.

-Booij AS, van de Kuilen G. A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. Journal of Economic Psychology 2009;30; 651-666.

-Booij A, van Praag B, van de Kuilen G. A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. Theory and Decision 2010;68; 115-148.

-Bostic R, Herrnstein RJ, Luce RD. The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1990;13; 193-212.

-Chateauneuf A, Cohen M. Risk Seeking with Diminishing Marginal Utility in a Non-expected Utility Model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1994;9; 77-91.

-Fehr-Duda H, de Gennaro M, Schubert R. Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weights. Theory and Decision 2006;60; 283-313.

-Fox CR, Poldrack RA 2008. Prospect theory and the brain. In: Glimcher P, Fehr E, Camerer C, Poldrack RA (Eds), Handbook of Neuroeconomics, San Diego: Academic Press; 2008.

-Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 2002;40; 351-401.

-Gafni A, Torrance GW. Risk Attitude and Time Preference in Health. Management Science 1984;30; 440-451.

-Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 1979;47; 263-291.

-Knoph Kvamme M, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Kristiansen IS. Increasing marginal utility of small increases in life-expectancy? Results from a population survey. Journal of Health Economics 2010;29; 541-548.

-Köbberling V, Wakker PP. An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory 2005;122; 119-131.

-Laughhunn DJ, Payne JW, Crum R. Managerial Risk Preferences for Below-Target Returns. Management Science 1980;26; 1238-1249.

-Libby R, Fishburn PC. Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decisions: A Survey and Evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 1977;15; pp. 272-292.

-Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Medical Decision Making 1982;2; 449-462.

-Marquis MS, Holmer MR. Alternative Models of Choice Under Uncertainty and Demand for Health Insurance. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1996;78; pp. 421-427.

-Miyamoto JM, Eraker SA. Parametric models of the utility of survival duration: Tests of axioms in a generic utility framework. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1989;44; 166-202.

-Ogaki M, Zhang Q. Decreasing Relative Risk Aversion and Tests of Risk Sharing. Econometrica 2001;69; pp. 515-526.

-Oliver A. The internal consistency of the standard gamble: tests after adjusting for prospect theory. Journal of Health Economics 2003;22; 659-674.

-Pinto-Prades JL, Loomes G, Brey R. Trying to estimate a monetary value for the QALY. Journal of Health Economics 2009;28; 553-562.

-Pliskin JS, Shepard D, Weinstein MC. Utility functions for life years and health status. Operations Research 1980;28; 206-224.

-Robinson A, Loomes G, Jones-Lee M. Visual Analog Scales, Standard Gambles, and Relative Risk Aversion. Medical Decision Making 2001;21; 17-27.

-Schmidt U, Traub S. An Experimental Test of Loss Aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2002;25; 233-249.

-Schmidt U, Zank H. A Genuine Foundation for Prospect Theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2012;45; 97-113.

-Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 2000;38; 332-382.

-Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM, Kievit J, Leer JW, Stoter G, de Haes JC. Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores. Medical Decision Making 1994;14; 82-90.

-Stott H. Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2006;32; 101-130.

-Treadwell JR, Lenert LA. Health Values and Prospect Theory. Medical Decision Making 1999;19; 344-352.

-Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 1986;59; S251-S278.

-Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1991;106; 1039-1061.

-Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992;5; 297-323.

-van de Kuilen G, Wakker PP. The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes Toward Risk and Ambiguity. Management Science 2011;57; 582-598.

-van Nooten FE, Brouwer WBF. The influence of subjective expectations about length and quality of life on time trade-off answers. Health Economics 2004;13; 819-823.

-van Osch SMC, Stiggelbout AM. The construction of standard gamble utilities. Health Economics 2008;17; 31-40.

-van Osch SMC, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM. Exploring the Reference Point in Prospect Theory: Gambles for Length of Life. Medical Decision Making 2006;26; 338-346.

-van Osch SM, Wakker PP, van den Hout, W. B., Stiggelbout AM. Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities. Medical Decision Making 2004;24; 511-517.

-Verhoef LCG, de Haan AFJ, van Daal WA. Risk attitude in gambles with years of life: Empirical support for prospect theory Medical Decision Making 1994;14; 194-200.

-Wakker P. Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision 1994;36; 1-44.

-Wakker PP. Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

-Wakker P, Deneffe D. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown. Management Science 1996;42; 1131-1150.

-Wakker P, Stiggelbout A. Explaining Distortions in Utility Elicitation through the Rank-dependent Model for Risky Choices. Medical Decision Making 1995;15; 180-186.

-Wu G, Gonzalez R. Nonlinear Decision Weights in Choice Under Uncertainty. Management Science 1999;45; 74-85.