Narayanan, Supreena and Burkart, Mike (2005): The Role of Accounting Conservatism in a well-functioning Corporate Governance System.
Download (70Kb) | Preview
This paper analyses accounting related to corporate governance and is organized as follows. The first section deals with understanding the concept of accounting conservatism. In the second section we analyzed the Relevance of Accounting Conservatism in Corporate Governance to the modern corporate world. The third section includes a Case Study on Ericsson, a Swedish Telecommunications company and conservatism in strong governance firms versus weak governance firms. The fourth part is devoted to the conclusion of our research efforts. From this study, we conclude that there are several reasons to use accounting conservatism in corporate governance and that current empirical evidence indicates that conservatism has increased in the last decades. The value of β3 in Table 1 indicates that there is a positive significant level of conservatism in accounting practices followed by Ericsson. When the dependent variable is earnings (X), the asymmetric timeliness of earnings coefficient β3 in Table 2 provides an estimate of the level of conservatism. We observe that strong governance firms are more conservative than weak governance firms (0.13 versus 0.04).
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Stockholm School of Economics|
|Original Title:||The Role of Accounting Conservatism in a well-functioning Corporate Governance System|
|Keywords:||corporate governance; financial system; accounting conservatism|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance|
|Depositing User:||Supreena Narayanan|
|Date Deposited:||13. Aug 2007|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 00:44|
Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24: 3-37. Basu, S., 1999. Discussion of International differences in the timeliness, conservatism and classification of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (Supplement): 89-99 Beaver, W.H. and S.G. Ryan, 2004, “Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling”, Stanford University and New York University. Bertrand, M. and S. Mullainathan. 2001. Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (3): 901-932. Högfeldt, Peter, Oct 16 2003, “Socialist ideal that tied up Swedish riches”, Financial Times London. Penman, Stephen H., Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation, 2004, McGraw-Hill. Pope, P.F. and M. Walker, 2003, “Ex-ante and ex-post accounting conservatism, asset recognition and asymmetric earnings timeliness”, Lancaster University and The University of Manchester. Schroeder, Richard G. et al, Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis, 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Sterling, Robert R., 1970, Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income, University of Kansas Press. The Centre for Research in Security Prices-http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/research/crsp Watts, R. 2003a, Conservatism in accounting Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17 (3): 207-221. Watts, R., 2003b, Conservatism in accounting Part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons,17 (4): 287-301. www.ericsson.com www.iasb.org