On the Eonomic Purpose of General Purpose Technologies: A Combined Classical and Evolutionary Framework

Strohmaier, Rita and Rainer, Andreas (2013): On the Eonomic Purpose of General Purpose Technologies: A Combined Classical and Evolutionary Framework.

Abstract

General purpose technologies (GPTs) are technical breakthroughs that are able to spur growth via their pervasive use in the economy. This paper attempts to study the effects of these innovations for the economic system on an empirical and theoretical level. A structural decomposition analysis for Denmark from 1966 to 2007 tracks the impact of the current GPT, the information and communication technology (ICT), on aggregate and sectoral labor productivity growth. Findings show that the broad diffusion of ICT affected growth significantly after 2000, owing to technical change, substitution and capital deepening, and can be associated with skill-induced wage dispersion. The diffusion process of a GPT is subsequently reconstructed by an evolutionary multisectoral framework: The Sraffian input-output approach is combined with the replicator dynamics approach of evolutionary game theory. Technical unemployment, transitional wage inequality and decelerating economic growth after the appearance of a GPT can thereby be explained.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sraffa, labor productivity, structural decomposition analysis, ICT, evolutionary economics
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Aghion, P., 2002. Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica 70 (3), 855-882.

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1998a. On the macroeconomic effects of major technological change. In: Helpman, E. (Ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ch. 5, pp. 121-144.

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1998b. On the macroeconomic effects of major technological change. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 53-75.

Allen, S., 2001. Technology and the wage structure. Journal of Labor Economics 19 (2), 440-483.

Basu, S., Fernald, J., 2007. Information and communications technology as a general-purpose technology: Evidence from US industry data. German Economic Review 8 (2), 146-173.

D. Autor, L. K., Krueger, A., 1998. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labour market? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1169-1214.

DeCicco, J., Fung, F., 2006. Global warming on the road. The climate impact of America's automobiles. Tech. Rep. 975, Environmental Defense Fund. URL http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/5301_ Globalwarmingontheroad_0.pdf

Degasperi, M., Fredholm, T., 2010. Productivity accounting based on production prices. Metroeconomica 61 (2), 267-281.

Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., 1997. Analyzing decomposition analyses. In: Simonovits, A., Steenge, A. E. (Eds.), Prices, Growth and Cycles. Macmillan, London, pp. 108-131.

Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., 1998. Structural decomposition techniques: Sense and sensitivity. Economic Systems Research 10 (4), 307-323.

E. Berman, J. B., Griliches, Z., 1994. Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing industries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (1), 367-398.

Helpman, E. (Ed.), 1998. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge.

Helpman, E., Trajtenberg, M., 1996. Diffffusion of general purpose technologies. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

Helpman, E., Trajtenberg, M., 1998a. Diffusion of general purpose technologies. In: Helpman, E. (Ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ch. 3, pp. 85-119.

Helpman, E., Trajtenberg, M., 1998b. A time to sow and a time to reap: Growth based on general purpose technologies. In: Helpman, E. (Ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ch. 3, pp. 55-83.

Inklaar, R., Timmer, M., 2007. Comparisons of industry output, inputs and productivity levels. Economic Systems Research 19 (3), 343-363.

Jacob, J., 2003. Structural change, liberalization and growth: The Indonesian experience in an input-output perspective. Tech. rep., available at http://www. druid.dk/conferences/winter2003/Paper/jacob.pdf.

Jorgenson, D., Ho, M., Samuels, J., Stiroh, K., 2007. Industry origins of the American productivity resurgence. Economic Systems Research 19 (3), 229-252.

Jorgenson, D., Timmer, M., 2011. Structural change in advanced nations: A new set of stylised facts. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 113 (1), 1-29.

Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P. L., 2005a. General purpose technologies. Tech. Rep. 11093, National Bureau of Economic Research. URL http://www.nber.org/papers/w11093 36

Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P. L., 2005b. General purpose technologies. In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. Vol. 1B. Elsevier B.V., Ch. 18, pp. 1181-1224.

Koski, H., Rouvinen, P., Anttila, P., 2002. ICT clusters in Europe: The great central banana and the small Nordic potato. Information Economics Policy 14, 145-165.

Krueger, A., 1993. How computers have changed the wage structure: Evidence from microdata, 1984-1989. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1), 33-60.

Kurz, H., Salvadori, N., 1995. Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Lenzen, M., 2003. Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the australian economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 14, 1-34.

Leontief, W., 1928. Die wirtschaft als kreislauf. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 60, 577-623.

Levy, F., Murnane, R., 1996. With what skills are computers complements? American Economic Review 86 (2), 258-262.

Lipsey, R. G., Carlaw, K. I., Bekar, C. T., 2005. Economic Transformations. General Purpose Technologies and Long-Term Economic Growth. Oxford University Press, New York.

Majumdar, S., 2008. Broadband adoption,jobs and wages in the us telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy 32, 587-599.

McGowan, M. A., Jamet, S., 2012. Sluggish productivity growth in Denmark: The usual suspects? Tech. Rep. 975, OECD Economics DepartmentWorking Papers.

Miller, R. E., Blair, P., 2009. Input-output analysis; Foundations and extensions. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge [u.a.].

Murphy, K., Welch, F., 1992. The structure of wages. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 255-85.

Nahuis, R., 2004. Learning of innovation and the skill premium. Journal of Economics 83 (2), 151{179.

Rainer, A., 2012. Technical change in a combined classical - evolutionary multisector economy, Graz Schumpeter Centre Working paper No. 2.

Rose, A., Casler, S., 1996. Input-output structural decomposition analysis: a critical appraisal. Economic Systems Research 8 (1), 33-62.

Sraffa, P., 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Yang, L., Lahr, M. L., 2008. Labor productivity differences in china 1987-1997: An interregional decomposition analysis. The Review of Regional Studies 38 (3), 319-341.

Yang, L., Lahr, M. L., 2010. Sources of Chinese labor productivity growth: A structural decomposition analysis, 1987-2005. China Economic Review 21, 557-570.