The Sustainable Livelihood Framework: A Reconstruction

Mensah, Emmanuel Joseph (2011): The Sustainable Livelihood Framework: A Reconstruction. Published in: The Development Review , Vol. 1, No. 1 (October 2012): pp. 7-24.

Abstract

This paper provides a new construction of the Sustainable Livelihood Framework. Underlying the need for this reconstruction is the persisting argument that the framework is too micro, too household focused, thereby limiting its utility as a micro-macro analytical tool for policy analysis and impact evaluation. In so doing, this paper elaborated assets in the framework on the basis of the degree of user rights that households are able to exercise rather than the form in which they exist. The paper also introduced the concept of relative cumulative effect to present more rigorous understanding of households’ influence on society’s sustainable development trajectory. On these bases, sustainable livelihood is theorized as endogenously determined by the balance between households’ livelihood expectations and the evolutionary path that institutions follow as they respond to households’ cumulative feedback. This framework thus provide a context for providing household-based understanding of institutional evolution and livelihood formation vis-à-vis micro/macro-interventions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: sustainable livelihood framework, household livelihood expectations, institutional evolution, sustainable development
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis

References

Ashley, Caroline and Diana Carney (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods: Lessons from Early Experience. Department for International Development, London.

Carney, Diana (2002). Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: Progress and Possibilities for Change. Department for International Development (DfID), UK.

Chambers, Robert and Gordon R. Conway. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, IDS, Brighton.

Clark, Jane and Diana Carney (2008). Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: What Have We Learnt? A Seminar Report, ESRC, London.

DfID (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheet. Department of International Development (DfID), London.

GSS (2004). Ghana Living Standard Survey 5: The Enumerators’ Manual. Ghana Statistical Service, Accra.

Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, Vol. 162, p. 1243 – 1248.

Hussein, Karim. (2002). Livelihoods Approaches Compared: A Multi-Agency Review of Current Practice. A paper of the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and the Department for International Development (DFID), London.

IFAD (2011). Sustainable Livelihood Framework [Online] Available http://www.ifad.org/sla/index.htm (August 15, 2012).

Maunder, D, A. Davies, Bryceson D., J. Howe, T. Mbara and T. Onweng. (2001). Sustainable Livelihoods, Mobility and Access Needs in Urban and Peri-urban Areas. A paper presented to the 20th Annual South African Transport Conference 16 July 2001 “Meeting the transport Challenges in Southern Africa”, CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria.

Mensah, Emmanuel Joseph (forthcoming). The Differential Impact of Access to Public Infrastructure on Household Economic Welfare in Rural Ghana: A Pseudo Panel Evaluation.

Robinson, Joan. (1971). Economic Heresies: Some Old Fashioned Questions in Economic Theory. London.

Scoone, Ian (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. IDS, UK.

Sen, Amartya (1981). Ingredients of Famine Analysis. Availability and Entitlements. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, No. 3 (p. 433 – 464), MIT Press.

Udry, Chris and Rohini P. (2005). Institutions and Development: A View from Below. Centre Discussion Paper No. 928. The Economic Growth Centre, Yale University, New Haven.